Cargando…

Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits

The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padulo, J, Vando, S, Chamari, K, Chaouachi, A, Bagno, D, Pizzolato, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729150
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282
_version_ 1782355335423459328
author Padulo, J
Vando, S
Chamari, K
Chaouachi, A
Bagno, D
Pizzolato, F
author_facet Padulo, J
Vando, S
Chamari, K
Chaouachi, A
Bagno, D
Pizzolato, F
author_sort Padulo, J
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speeds. During the test, the active marker for MW and a passive marker for video analysis were recorded simultaneously with the two devices. The displacement of the marker on the two axes (x-y) was computed using two different programs, Kinovea 0.8.15 and CoreMeter, for the camera and MW, respectively. Pearson correlation was acceptable (x-axis r≥0.734 and y-axis r≥0.684), and Bland–Altman plots of the walking speeds showed an average error of 0.24±0.52% and 1.5±0.91% for the x- and y-axis, respectively. The difference of running speeds showed average errors of 0.67±0.33% and 1.26±0.33% for the x- and y-axes, respectively. These results demonstrate that the two measures are similar from both the x- and the y-axis perspective. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the MarkWiiR is a valid and reliable tool to assess the kinematics of an active marker during walking and running gaits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4314604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43146042015-03-01 Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits Padulo, J Vando, S Chamari, K Chaouachi, A Bagno, D Pizzolato, F Biol Sport Original Article The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speeds. During the test, the active marker for MW and a passive marker for video analysis were recorded simultaneously with the two devices. The displacement of the marker on the two axes (x-y) was computed using two different programs, Kinovea 0.8.15 and CoreMeter, for the camera and MW, respectively. Pearson correlation was acceptable (x-axis r≥0.734 and y-axis r≥0.684), and Bland–Altman plots of the walking speeds showed an average error of 0.24±0.52% and 1.5±0.91% for the x- and y-axis, respectively. The difference of running speeds showed average errors of 0.67±0.33% and 1.26±0.33% for the x- and y-axes, respectively. These results demonstrate that the two measures are similar from both the x- and the y-axis perspective. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the MarkWiiR is a valid and reliable tool to assess the kinematics of an active marker during walking and running gaits. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2014-11-03 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4314604/ /pubmed/25729150 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Padulo, J
Vando, S
Chamari, K
Chaouachi, A
Bagno, D
Pizzolato, F
Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title_full Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title_fullStr Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title_short Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
title_sort validity of the markwiir for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729150
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282
work_keys_str_mv AT paduloj validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits
AT vandos validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits
AT chamarik validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits
AT chaouachia validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits
AT bagnod validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits
AT pizzolatof validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits