Cargando…
Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits
The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729150 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282 |
_version_ | 1782355335423459328 |
---|---|
author | Padulo, J Vando, S Chamari, K Chaouachi, A Bagno, D Pizzolato, F |
author_facet | Padulo, J Vando, S Chamari, K Chaouachi, A Bagno, D Pizzolato, F |
author_sort | Padulo, J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speeds. During the test, the active marker for MW and a passive marker for video analysis were recorded simultaneously with the two devices. The displacement of the marker on the two axes (x-y) was computed using two different programs, Kinovea 0.8.15 and CoreMeter, for the camera and MW, respectively. Pearson correlation was acceptable (x-axis r≥0.734 and y-axis r≥0.684), and Bland–Altman plots of the walking speeds showed an average error of 0.24±0.52% and 1.5±0.91% for the x- and y-axis, respectively. The difference of running speeds showed average errors of 0.67±0.33% and 1.26±0.33% for the x- and y-axes, respectively. These results demonstrate that the two measures are similar from both the x- and the y-axis perspective. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the MarkWiiR is a valid and reliable tool to assess the kinematics of an active marker during walking and running gaits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4314604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43146042015-03-01 Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits Padulo, J Vando, S Chamari, K Chaouachi, A Bagno, D Pizzolato, F Biol Sport Original Article The aim of this study was to validate the MarkWiiR (MW) captured by the Nintendo Wii-Remote (100-Hz) to assess active marker displacement by comparison with 2D video analysis. Ten participants were tested on a treadmill at different walking (1<6 km · h(−1)) and running (10<13 km · h(−1)) speeds. During the test, the active marker for MW and a passive marker for video analysis were recorded simultaneously with the two devices. The displacement of the marker on the two axes (x-y) was computed using two different programs, Kinovea 0.8.15 and CoreMeter, for the camera and MW, respectively. Pearson correlation was acceptable (x-axis r≥0.734 and y-axis r≥0.684), and Bland–Altman plots of the walking speeds showed an average error of 0.24±0.52% and 1.5±0.91% for the x- and y-axis, respectively. The difference of running speeds showed average errors of 0.67±0.33% and 1.26±0.33% for the x- and y-axes, respectively. These results demonstrate that the two measures are similar from both the x- and the y-axis perspective. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the MarkWiiR is a valid and reliable tool to assess the kinematics of an active marker during walking and running gaits. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2014-11-03 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4314604/ /pubmed/25729150 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Padulo, J Vando, S Chamari, K Chaouachi, A Bagno, D Pizzolato, F Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title | Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title_full | Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title_fullStr | Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title_short | Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
title_sort | validity of the markwiir for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729150 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paduloj validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits AT vandos validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits AT chamarik validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits AT chaouachia validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits AT bagnod validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits AT pizzolatof validityofthemarkwiirforkinematicanalysisduringwalkingandrunninggaits |