Cargando…

Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia notifications continue to rise in young people in many countries and regular chlamydia testing is an important prevention strategy. Although there have been initiatives to increase testing in primary care, none have specifically investigated the role of practice nurses (PNs) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorch, Rebecca, Hocking, Jane, Guy, Rebecca, Vaisey, Alaina, Wood, Anna, Donovan, Basil, Fairley, Christopher, Gunn, Jane, Kaldor, John, Temple-Smith, Meredith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0757-7
_version_ 1782355360809484288
author Lorch, Rebecca
Hocking, Jane
Guy, Rebecca
Vaisey, Alaina
Wood, Anna
Donovan, Basil
Fairley, Christopher
Gunn, Jane
Kaldor, John
Temple-Smith, Meredith
author_facet Lorch, Rebecca
Hocking, Jane
Guy, Rebecca
Vaisey, Alaina
Wood, Anna
Donovan, Basil
Fairley, Christopher
Gunn, Jane
Kaldor, John
Temple-Smith, Meredith
author_sort Lorch, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia notifications continue to rise in young people in many countries and regular chlamydia testing is an important prevention strategy. Although there have been initiatives to increase testing in primary care, none have specifically investigated the role of practice nurses (PNs) in maximising testing rates. PNs have previously expressed a willingness to be involved, but noted lack of support from general practitioners (GPs) as a barrier. We sought GPs’ attitudes and opinions on PNs taking an expanded role in chlamydia testing and partner notification. METHODS: In the context of a cluster randomised trial in mostly rural towns in 4 Australian states, semi structured interviews were conducted with 44 GPs between March 2011 and July 2012. Data relating to PN involvement in chlamydia testing were thematically analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS: The majority of GPs interviewed felt that a role for PNs in chlamydia testing was appropriate. GPs felt that PNs had more time for patient education and advice, that patients would find PNs easier to talk to and less intimidating than GPs, and that GPs themselves could benefit through a reduction in their workload. Although GPs felt that PNs could be utilised more effectively for preventative health activities such as chlamydia testing, many raised concerns about how these activities would be renumerated whilst some felt that existing workload pressures for PNs could make it difficult for them to expand their role. Whilst some rural GPs recognised that PNs might be well placed to conduct partner notification, they also recognised that issues of patient privacy and confidentiality related to living in a “small town” was also a concern. CONCLUSION: This is the first qualitative study to explore GPs’ views around an increased role for PNs in chlamydia testing. Despite the concerns raised by PNs, these findings suggest that GPs support the concept and recognise that PNs are suited to the role. However issues raised, such as funding and remuneration may act as barriers that will need to be addressed before PNs are supported to make a contribution to increasing chlamydia testing rates in general practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4314754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43147542015-02-04 Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions Lorch, Rebecca Hocking, Jane Guy, Rebecca Vaisey, Alaina Wood, Anna Donovan, Basil Fairley, Christopher Gunn, Jane Kaldor, John Temple-Smith, Meredith BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydia notifications continue to rise in young people in many countries and regular chlamydia testing is an important prevention strategy. Although there have been initiatives to increase testing in primary care, none have specifically investigated the role of practice nurses (PNs) in maximising testing rates. PNs have previously expressed a willingness to be involved, but noted lack of support from general practitioners (GPs) as a barrier. We sought GPs’ attitudes and opinions on PNs taking an expanded role in chlamydia testing and partner notification. METHODS: In the context of a cluster randomised trial in mostly rural towns in 4 Australian states, semi structured interviews were conducted with 44 GPs between March 2011 and July 2012. Data relating to PN involvement in chlamydia testing were thematically analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS: The majority of GPs interviewed felt that a role for PNs in chlamydia testing was appropriate. GPs felt that PNs had more time for patient education and advice, that patients would find PNs easier to talk to and less intimidating than GPs, and that GPs themselves could benefit through a reduction in their workload. Although GPs felt that PNs could be utilised more effectively for preventative health activities such as chlamydia testing, many raised concerns about how these activities would be renumerated whilst some felt that existing workload pressures for PNs could make it difficult for them to expand their role. Whilst some rural GPs recognised that PNs might be well placed to conduct partner notification, they also recognised that issues of patient privacy and confidentiality related to living in a “small town” was also a concern. CONCLUSION: This is the first qualitative study to explore GPs’ views around an increased role for PNs in chlamydia testing. Despite the concerns raised by PNs, these findings suggest that GPs support the concept and recognise that PNs are suited to the role. However issues raised, such as funding and remuneration may act as barriers that will need to be addressed before PNs are supported to make a contribution to increasing chlamydia testing rates in general practice. BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4314754/ /pubmed/25885341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0757-7 Text en © Lorch et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lorch, Rebecca
Hocking, Jane
Guy, Rebecca
Vaisey, Alaina
Wood, Anna
Donovan, Basil
Fairley, Christopher
Gunn, Jane
Kaldor, John
Temple-Smith, Meredith
Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title_full Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title_fullStr Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title_full_unstemmed Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title_short Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
title_sort do australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? a qualitative study of attitudes and opinions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0757-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lorchrebecca doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT hockingjane doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT guyrebecca doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT vaiseyalaina doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT woodanna doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT donovanbasil doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT fairleychristopher doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT gunnjane doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT kaldorjohn doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT templesmithmeredith doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions
AT doaustraliangeneralpractitionersbelievepracticenursescantakearoleinchlamydiatestingaqualitativestudyofattitudesandopinions