Cargando…
Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1 |
_version_ | 1782355369290366976 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Jason J Temple-Smith, Meredith Chen, Marcus Walker, Sandra Grulich, Andrew Hoy, Jennifer Fairley, Christopher K |
author_facet | Ong, Jason J Temple-Smith, Meredith Chen, Marcus Walker, Sandra Grulich, Andrew Hoy, Jennifer Fairley, Christopher K |
author_sort | Ong, Jason J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. METHODS: We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e.g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e.g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians’ concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4314790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43147902015-02-04 Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study Ong, Jason J Temple-Smith, Meredith Chen, Marcus Walker, Sandra Grulich, Andrew Hoy, Jennifer Fairley, Christopher K BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. METHODS: We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e.g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e.g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians’ concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care. BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4314790/ /pubmed/25636181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1 Text en © Ong et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ong, Jason J Temple-Smith, Meredith Chen, Marcus Walker, Sandra Grulich, Andrew Hoy, Jennifer Fairley, Christopher K Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title | Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title_full | Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title_short | Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
title_sort | why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - hiv physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in hiv-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ongjasonj whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT templesmithmeredith whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT chenmarcus whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT walkersandra whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT grulichandrew whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT hoyjennifer whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy AT fairleychristopherk whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy |