Cargando…

Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Jason J, Temple-Smith, Meredith, Chen, Marcus, Walker, Sandra, Grulich, Andrew, Hoy, Jennifer, Fairley, Christopher K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1
_version_ 1782355369290366976
author Ong, Jason J
Temple-Smith, Meredith
Chen, Marcus
Walker, Sandra
Grulich, Andrew
Hoy, Jennifer
Fairley, Christopher K
author_facet Ong, Jason J
Temple-Smith, Meredith
Chen, Marcus
Walker, Sandra
Grulich, Andrew
Hoy, Jennifer
Fairley, Christopher K
author_sort Ong, Jason J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. METHODS: We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e.g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e.g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians’ concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4314790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43147902015-02-04 Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study Ong, Jason J Temple-Smith, Meredith Chen, Marcus Walker, Sandra Grulich, Andrew Hoy, Jennifer Fairley, Christopher K BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. METHODS: We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e.g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e.g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians’ concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care. BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4314790/ /pubmed/25636181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1 Text en © Ong et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ong, Jason J
Temple-Smith, Meredith
Chen, Marcus
Walker, Sandra
Grulich, Andrew
Hoy, Jennifer
Fairley, Christopher K
Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title_full Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title_short Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
title_sort why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - hiv physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in hiv-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ongjasonj whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT templesmithmeredith whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT chenmarcus whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT walkersandra whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT grulichandrew whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT hoyjennifer whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy
AT fairleychristopherk whyarewenotscreeningforanalcancerroutinelyhivphysiciansperspectivesonanalcanceranditsscreeninginhivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativestudy