Cargando…

In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics

AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalithapriya, S, Kumaran, N Kurunji, Rajasigamani, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657988
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612
_version_ 1782355377050877952
author Lalithapriya, S
Kumaran, N Kurunji
Rajasigamani, K
author_facet Lalithapriya, S
Kumaran, N Kurunji
Rajasigamani, K
author_sort Lalithapriya, S
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different conditions for a total of 270 upper premolar lingual brackets (0.018″ × 0.025″ - conventional - 7(th) generation and STb, self-ligating – evolution) with no in-built tip or torque together with 0.016″ × 0.022″ straight length SS archwires. For conventional brackets, the archwire was secured with 0.008″ preformed SS short ligature ties. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD as post-hoc test was applied for degree wise and bracket wise comparison within dry condition and wet condition. For pair wise comparison Student's t-test was used. RESULTS: Under both conditions the static frictional resistance is significantly higher for self-ligating brackets at 0°, while at 5° and 10° it is higher for 7(th) generation brackets. Statistically, significant difference does not exist at 0° between conventional brackets and the same was found at 5° and 10° between STb and self-ligating brackets. With an increase in second order angulations, all the evaluated samples exhibited an increased frictional value. Wet condition samples obtained a higher value than their corresponding dry condition. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating bracket evaluated in this in vitro study is not beneficial in reducing friction during en-mass retraction due to its interactive clip type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4314836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43148362015-02-05 In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics Lalithapriya, S Kumaran, N Kurunji Rajasigamani, K J Orthod Sci Original Article AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different conditions for a total of 270 upper premolar lingual brackets (0.018″ × 0.025″ - conventional - 7(th) generation and STb, self-ligating – evolution) with no in-built tip or torque together with 0.016″ × 0.022″ straight length SS archwires. For conventional brackets, the archwire was secured with 0.008″ preformed SS short ligature ties. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD as post-hoc test was applied for degree wise and bracket wise comparison within dry condition and wet condition. For pair wise comparison Student's t-test was used. RESULTS: Under both conditions the static frictional resistance is significantly higher for self-ligating brackets at 0°, while at 5° and 10° it is higher for 7(th) generation brackets. Statistically, significant difference does not exist at 0° between conventional brackets and the same was found at 5° and 10° between STb and self-ligating brackets. With an increase in second order angulations, all the evaluated samples exhibited an increased frictional value. Wet condition samples obtained a higher value than their corresponding dry condition. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating bracket evaluated in this in vitro study is not beneficial in reducing friction during en-mass retraction due to its interactive clip type. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4314836/ /pubmed/25657988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lalithapriya, S
Kumaran, N Kurunji
Rajasigamani, K
In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title_full In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title_fullStr In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title_full_unstemmed In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title_short In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
title_sort in vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657988
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612
work_keys_str_mv AT lalithapriyas invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics
AT kumarannkurunji invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics
AT rajasigamanik invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics