Cargando…
In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics
AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different condition...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612 |
_version_ | 1782355377050877952 |
---|---|
author | Lalithapriya, S Kumaran, N Kurunji Rajasigamani, K |
author_facet | Lalithapriya, S Kumaran, N Kurunji Rajasigamani, K |
author_sort | Lalithapriya, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different conditions for a total of 270 upper premolar lingual brackets (0.018″ × 0.025″ - conventional - 7(th) generation and STb, self-ligating – evolution) with no in-built tip or torque together with 0.016″ × 0.022″ straight length SS archwires. For conventional brackets, the archwire was secured with 0.008″ preformed SS short ligature ties. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD as post-hoc test was applied for degree wise and bracket wise comparison within dry condition and wet condition. For pair wise comparison Student's t-test was used. RESULTS: Under both conditions the static frictional resistance is significantly higher for self-ligating brackets at 0°, while at 5° and 10° it is higher for 7(th) generation brackets. Statistically, significant difference does not exist at 0° between conventional brackets and the same was found at 5° and 10° between STb and self-ligating brackets. With an increase in second order angulations, all the evaluated samples exhibited an increased frictional value. Wet condition samples obtained a higher value than their corresponding dry condition. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating bracket evaluated in this in vitro study is not beneficial in reducing friction during en-mass retraction due to its interactive clip type. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4314836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43148362015-02-05 In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics Lalithapriya, S Kumaran, N Kurunji Rajasigamani, K J Orthod Sci Original Article AIM: To determine the static frictional resistance of different lingual brackets at different second order angulations when coupled with stainless steel (SS) archwire in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified jig, frictional resistance was evaluated under different conditions for a total of 270 upper premolar lingual brackets (0.018″ × 0.025″ - conventional - 7(th) generation and STb, self-ligating – evolution) with no in-built tip or torque together with 0.016″ × 0.022″ straight length SS archwires. For conventional brackets, the archwire was secured with 0.008″ preformed SS short ligature ties. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD as post-hoc test was applied for degree wise and bracket wise comparison within dry condition and wet condition. For pair wise comparison Student's t-test was used. RESULTS: Under both conditions the static frictional resistance is significantly higher for self-ligating brackets at 0°, while at 5° and 10° it is higher for 7(th) generation brackets. Statistically, significant difference does not exist at 0° between conventional brackets and the same was found at 5° and 10° between STb and self-ligating brackets. With an increase in second order angulations, all the evaluated samples exhibited an increased frictional value. Wet condition samples obtained a higher value than their corresponding dry condition. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating bracket evaluated in this in vitro study is not beneficial in reducing friction during en-mass retraction due to its interactive clip type. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4314836/ /pubmed/25657988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lalithapriya, S Kumaran, N Kurunji Rajasigamani, K In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title | In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title_full | In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title_fullStr | In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title_short | In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
title_sort | in vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lalithapriyas invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics AT kumarannkurunji invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics AT rajasigamanik invitroassessmentofcompetencyfordifferentlingualbracketsinslidingmechanics |