Cargando…

Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan

BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Michiko, Kubota, Kiyoshi, Okazaki, Mitsuhiro, Dobashi, Akira, Hashiguchi, Masayuki, Doi, Hirohisa, Suka, Machi, Mochizuki, Mayumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670886
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761
_version_ 1782355491802841088
author Yamamoto, Michiko
Kubota, Kiyoshi
Okazaki, Mitsuhiro
Dobashi, Akira
Hashiguchi, Masayuki
Doi, Hirohisa
Suka, Machi
Mochizuki, Mayumi
author_facet Yamamoto, Michiko
Kubota, Kiyoshi
Okazaki, Mitsuhiro
Dobashi, Akira
Hashiguchi, Masayuki
Doi, Hirohisa
Suka, Machi
Mochizuki, Mayumi
author_sort Yamamoto, Michiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the patient reporters, and to clarify patient views and experiences of reporting. METHODS: Patients who submitted online ADR reports were contacted to respond to an ADR reporting questionnaire; only consenting reporters were included. Subjects with multiple responses were excluded from analysis. The questionnaire consisted of both closed and open questions. Questionnaire responses were examined using Pearson’s chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 220 web-based ADR reports were collected from January to December 2011; questionnaires were sent to 190 reporters, excluding those who gave multiple reports and those that refused to be contacted. Responses were obtained from 94 individuals (effective response rate: 49.5%). The median respondent age was 46.0 years. Sixty-three respondents found out about this pilot study on the Internet (67.0%). The numbers of respondents claiming that they had difficulty recalling the time/date of ADR occurrence were 16 patient reporters and three non-patient reporters. The number of reporters who found it difficult to complete the online reporting form was 22 patients (26.2%) and one non-patient (10%). Fifty-seven respondents (60.6%) expected feedback after reporting and many respondents wanted to know the process of ADR data collection and related information. Seventy-three respondents (77.7%) stated that they would report ADRs again in future. CONCLUSION: Throughout the entire questionnaire, online patient ADR reporting was received with a forward-looking, positive approach. To facilitate smoother web-based reporting experiences in future, some improvements may be required in online ADR reporting forms, particularly with regard to respondent feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4315543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43155432015-02-10 Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan Yamamoto, Michiko Kubota, Kiyoshi Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Dobashi, Akira Hashiguchi, Masayuki Doi, Hirohisa Suka, Machi Mochizuki, Mayumi Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the patient reporters, and to clarify patient views and experiences of reporting. METHODS: Patients who submitted online ADR reports were contacted to respond to an ADR reporting questionnaire; only consenting reporters were included. Subjects with multiple responses were excluded from analysis. The questionnaire consisted of both closed and open questions. Questionnaire responses were examined using Pearson’s chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 220 web-based ADR reports were collected from January to December 2011; questionnaires were sent to 190 reporters, excluding those who gave multiple reports and those that refused to be contacted. Responses were obtained from 94 individuals (effective response rate: 49.5%). The median respondent age was 46.0 years. Sixty-three respondents found out about this pilot study on the Internet (67.0%). The numbers of respondents claiming that they had difficulty recalling the time/date of ADR occurrence were 16 patient reporters and three non-patient reporters. The number of reporters who found it difficult to complete the online reporting form was 22 patients (26.2%) and one non-patient (10%). Fifty-seven respondents (60.6%) expected feedback after reporting and many respondents wanted to know the process of ADR data collection and related information. Seventy-three respondents (77.7%) stated that they would report ADRs again in future. CONCLUSION: Throughout the entire questionnaire, online patient ADR reporting was received with a forward-looking, positive approach. To facilitate smoother web-based reporting experiences in future, some improvements may be required in online ADR reporting forms, particularly with regard to respondent feedback. Dove Medical Press 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4315543/ /pubmed/25670886 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761 Text en © 2015 Yamamoto et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yamamoto, Michiko
Kubota, Kiyoshi
Okazaki, Mitsuhiro
Dobashi, Akira
Hashiguchi, Masayuki
Doi, Hirohisa
Suka, Machi
Mochizuki, Mayumi
Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title_full Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title_fullStr Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title_short Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
title_sort patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in japan
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670886
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotomichiko patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT kubotakiyoshi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT okazakimitsuhiro patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT dobashiakira patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT hashiguchimasayuki patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT doihirohisa patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT sukamachi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan
AT mochizukimayumi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan