Cargando…
Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670886 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761 |
_version_ | 1782355491802841088 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Michiko Kubota, Kiyoshi Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Dobashi, Akira Hashiguchi, Masayuki Doi, Hirohisa Suka, Machi Mochizuki, Mayumi |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Michiko Kubota, Kiyoshi Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Dobashi, Akira Hashiguchi, Masayuki Doi, Hirohisa Suka, Machi Mochizuki, Mayumi |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Michiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the patient reporters, and to clarify patient views and experiences of reporting. METHODS: Patients who submitted online ADR reports were contacted to respond to an ADR reporting questionnaire; only consenting reporters were included. Subjects with multiple responses were excluded from analysis. The questionnaire consisted of both closed and open questions. Questionnaire responses were examined using Pearson’s chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 220 web-based ADR reports were collected from January to December 2011; questionnaires were sent to 190 reporters, excluding those who gave multiple reports and those that refused to be contacted. Responses were obtained from 94 individuals (effective response rate: 49.5%). The median respondent age was 46.0 years. Sixty-three respondents found out about this pilot study on the Internet (67.0%). The numbers of respondents claiming that they had difficulty recalling the time/date of ADR occurrence were 16 patient reporters and three non-patient reporters. The number of reporters who found it difficult to complete the online reporting form was 22 patients (26.2%) and one non-patient (10%). Fifty-seven respondents (60.6%) expected feedback after reporting and many respondents wanted to know the process of ADR data collection and related information. Seventy-three respondents (77.7%) stated that they would report ADRs again in future. CONCLUSION: Throughout the entire questionnaire, online patient ADR reporting was received with a forward-looking, positive approach. To facilitate smoother web-based reporting experiences in future, some improvements may be required in online ADR reporting forms, particularly with regard to respondent feedback. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4315543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43155432015-02-10 Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan Yamamoto, Michiko Kubota, Kiyoshi Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Dobashi, Akira Hashiguchi, Masayuki Doi, Hirohisa Suka, Machi Mochizuki, Mayumi Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: We started a pilot study to determine whether web-based patient ADR reporting would work in Japan. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the patient reporters, and to clarify patient views and experiences of reporting. METHODS: Patients who submitted online ADR reports were contacted to respond to an ADR reporting questionnaire; only consenting reporters were included. Subjects with multiple responses were excluded from analysis. The questionnaire consisted of both closed and open questions. Questionnaire responses were examined using Pearson’s chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 220 web-based ADR reports were collected from January to December 2011; questionnaires were sent to 190 reporters, excluding those who gave multiple reports and those that refused to be contacted. Responses were obtained from 94 individuals (effective response rate: 49.5%). The median respondent age was 46.0 years. Sixty-three respondents found out about this pilot study on the Internet (67.0%). The numbers of respondents claiming that they had difficulty recalling the time/date of ADR occurrence were 16 patient reporters and three non-patient reporters. The number of reporters who found it difficult to complete the online reporting form was 22 patients (26.2%) and one non-patient (10%). Fifty-seven respondents (60.6%) expected feedback after reporting and many respondents wanted to know the process of ADR data collection and related information. Seventy-three respondents (77.7%) stated that they would report ADRs again in future. CONCLUSION: Throughout the entire questionnaire, online patient ADR reporting was received with a forward-looking, positive approach. To facilitate smoother web-based reporting experiences in future, some improvements may be required in online ADR reporting forms, particularly with regard to respondent feedback. Dove Medical Press 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4315543/ /pubmed/25670886 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761 Text en © 2015 Yamamoto et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yamamoto, Michiko Kubota, Kiyoshi Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Dobashi, Akira Hashiguchi, Masayuki Doi, Hirohisa Suka, Machi Mochizuki, Mayumi Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title | Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title_full | Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title_fullStr | Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title_short | Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan |
title_sort | patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in japan |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670886 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotomichiko patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT kubotakiyoshi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT okazakimitsuhiro patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT dobashiakira patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT hashiguchimasayuki patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT doihirohisa patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT sukamachi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan AT mochizukimayumi patientsviewsandexperiencesinonlinereportingadversedrugreactionsfindingsofanationalpilotstudyinjapan |