Cargando…
Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
PURPOSE: To compare complete versus incomplete ring implantation for keratoconus correction. METHODS: We investigated 25 eyes of keratoconic patients, of which 15 had femtosecond-assisted MyoRing corneal implantation (Group 1) and 10 had femtosecond-assisted Keraring segments (Group 2). Uncorrected...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657576 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S73855 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To compare complete versus incomplete ring implantation for keratoconus correction. METHODS: We investigated 25 eyes of keratoconic patients, of which 15 had femtosecond-assisted MyoRing corneal implantation (Group 1) and 10 had femtosecond-assisted Keraring segments (Group 2). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), mean K (K(m)), sphere, topographic cylinder, and corneal asphericity value (Q-value) were measured in all eyes preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively (1 month). RESULTS: In Group 1, the K(m) change was −6.15±2.16 D, with a mean change in sphere of 4.45±2.18 D and a mean change in refractive cylinder of 2.32±3 D. UCVA change was −0.57±0.273 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), BCVA change was −0.2±0.27 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.43±2.6. In Group 2, the K(m) change was −3.15±1.68 D, UCVA change was −0.48±0.37 (LogMAR), BCVA change was −0.09±0.15 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.5±0.21. Changes in the means did not significantly differ between groups, except for the K(m) change, which was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Both complete ring and ring segment implantation are effective for improving corneal and visual parameters in keratoconus. Complete ring implantation may have a greater flattening effect on the anterior corneal surface. |
---|