Cargando…

The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss

Most flowering plants depend on pollinators to reproduce. Thus, evaluating the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages to species loss is a major concern. How species interaction patterns are related to species sensitivity to partner loss may influence the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astegiano, Julia, Massol, François, Vidal, Mariana Morais, Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier, Guimarães, Paulo R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25646762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117243
_version_ 1782355505182670848
author Astegiano, Julia
Massol, François
Vidal, Mariana Morais
Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier
Guimarães, Paulo R.
author_facet Astegiano, Julia
Massol, François
Vidal, Mariana Morais
Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier
Guimarães, Paulo R.
author_sort Astegiano, Julia
collection PubMed
description Most flowering plants depend on pollinators to reproduce. Thus, evaluating the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages to species loss is a major concern. How species interaction patterns are related to species sensitivity to partner loss may influence the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages. In plants, both reproductive dependence on pollinators (breeding system) and dispersal ability may modulate plant sensitivity to pollinator loss. For instance, species with strong dependence (e.g. dioecious species) and low dispersal (e.g. seeds dispersed by gravity) may be the most sensitive to pollinator loss. We compared the interaction patterns of plants differing in dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability in a meta-dataset comprising 192 plant species from 13 plant-pollinator networks. In addition, network robustness was compared under different scenarios representing sequences of plant extinctions associated with plant sensitivity to pollinator loss. Species with different dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability showed similar levels of generalization. Although plants with low dispersal ability interacted with more generalized pollinators, low-dispersal plants with strong dependence on pollinators (i.e. the most sensitive to pollinator loss) interacted with more particular sets of pollinators (i.e. shared a low proportion of pollinators with other plants). Only two assemblages showed lower robustness under the scenario considering plant generalization, dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability than under the scenario where extinction sequences only depended on plant generalization (i.e. where higher generalization level was associated with lower probability of extinction). Overall, our results support the idea that species generalization and network topology may be good predictors of assemblage robustness to species loss, independently of plant dispersal ability and breeding system. In contrast, since ecological specialization among partners may increase the probability of disruption of interactions, the fact that the plants most sensitive to pollinator loss interacted with more particular pollinator assemblages suggest that the persistence of these plants and their pollinators might be highly compromised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4315602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43156022015-02-13 The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss Astegiano, Julia Massol, François Vidal, Mariana Morais Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier Guimarães, Paulo R. PLoS One Research Article Most flowering plants depend on pollinators to reproduce. Thus, evaluating the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages to species loss is a major concern. How species interaction patterns are related to species sensitivity to partner loss may influence the robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages. In plants, both reproductive dependence on pollinators (breeding system) and dispersal ability may modulate plant sensitivity to pollinator loss. For instance, species with strong dependence (e.g. dioecious species) and low dispersal (e.g. seeds dispersed by gravity) may be the most sensitive to pollinator loss. We compared the interaction patterns of plants differing in dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability in a meta-dataset comprising 192 plant species from 13 plant-pollinator networks. In addition, network robustness was compared under different scenarios representing sequences of plant extinctions associated with plant sensitivity to pollinator loss. Species with different dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability showed similar levels of generalization. Although plants with low dispersal ability interacted with more generalized pollinators, low-dispersal plants with strong dependence on pollinators (i.e. the most sensitive to pollinator loss) interacted with more particular sets of pollinators (i.e. shared a low proportion of pollinators with other plants). Only two assemblages showed lower robustness under the scenario considering plant generalization, dependence on pollinators and dispersal ability than under the scenario where extinction sequences only depended on plant generalization (i.e. where higher generalization level was associated with lower probability of extinction). Overall, our results support the idea that species generalization and network topology may be good predictors of assemblage robustness to species loss, independently of plant dispersal ability and breeding system. In contrast, since ecological specialization among partners may increase the probability of disruption of interactions, the fact that the plants most sensitive to pollinator loss interacted with more particular pollinator assemblages suggest that the persistence of these plants and their pollinators might be highly compromised. Public Library of Science 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4315602/ /pubmed/25646762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117243 Text en © 2015 Astegiano et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Astegiano, Julia
Massol, François
Vidal, Mariana Morais
Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier
Guimarães, Paulo R.
The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title_full The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title_fullStr The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title_full_unstemmed The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title_short The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss
title_sort robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages: linking plant interaction patterns and sensitivity to pollinator loss
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25646762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117243
work_keys_str_mv AT astegianojulia therobustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT massolfrancois therobustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT vidalmarianamorais therobustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT cheptoupierreolivier therobustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT guimaraespaulor therobustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT astegianojulia robustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT massolfrancois robustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT vidalmarianamorais robustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT cheptoupierreolivier robustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss
AT guimaraespaulor robustnessofplantpollinatorassemblageslinkingplantinteractionpatternsandsensitivitytopollinatorloss