Cargando…

Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management

Syncope is a common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of about 40%. Implantable cardiac electronic devices, including implantable loop recorders (ILR) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), are well established in syncope management. However, despite the successful use of ILR and ICD,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Christian, Carvalho, Paulo, Brinkmeyer, Christoph, Kelm, Malte, Couceiro, Ricardo, Mühlsteff, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25608536
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892147
_version_ 1782355507983417344
author Meyer, Christian
Carvalho, Paulo
Brinkmeyer, Christoph
Kelm, Malte
Couceiro, Ricardo
Mühlsteff, Jens
author_facet Meyer, Christian
Carvalho, Paulo
Brinkmeyer, Christoph
Kelm, Malte
Couceiro, Ricardo
Mühlsteff, Jens
author_sort Meyer, Christian
collection PubMed
description Syncope is a common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of about 40%. Implantable cardiac electronic devices, including implantable loop recorders (ILR) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), are well established in syncope management. However, despite the successful use of ILR and ICD, diagnosis and therapy still remain challenging in many patients due to the complex hemodynamic interplay of cardiac and vascular adaptations during impending syncopes. Wearable sensors might overcome some limitations, including misdiagnosis and inappropriate defibrillator shocks, because a variety of physiological measures can now be easily acquired by a single non-invasive device at high signal quality. In neurally-mediated syncope (NMS), which is the most common cause of syncope, advanced signal processing methodologies paved the way to develop devices for early syncope detection. In contrast to the relatively benign NMS, in arrhythmia-related syncopes immediate therapeutical intervention, predominantly by electrical defibrillation, is often mandatory. However, in patients with a transient risk of arrhythmia-related syncope, limitations of ICD therapy might outweigh their potential therapeutic benefits. In this context the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator offers alternative therapeutical options for some high-risk patients. Herein, we review recent evidence demonstrating that wearable sensors might be useful to overcome some limitations of implantable devices in syncope management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4315629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43156292015-02-05 Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management Meyer, Christian Carvalho, Paulo Brinkmeyer, Christoph Kelm, Malte Couceiro, Ricardo Mühlsteff, Jens Med Sci Monit Review Article Syncope is a common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of about 40%. Implantable cardiac electronic devices, including implantable loop recorders (ILR) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), are well established in syncope management. However, despite the successful use of ILR and ICD, diagnosis and therapy still remain challenging in many patients due to the complex hemodynamic interplay of cardiac and vascular adaptations during impending syncopes. Wearable sensors might overcome some limitations, including misdiagnosis and inappropriate defibrillator shocks, because a variety of physiological measures can now be easily acquired by a single non-invasive device at high signal quality. In neurally-mediated syncope (NMS), which is the most common cause of syncope, advanced signal processing methodologies paved the way to develop devices for early syncope detection. In contrast to the relatively benign NMS, in arrhythmia-related syncopes immediate therapeutical intervention, predominantly by electrical defibrillation, is often mandatory. However, in patients with a transient risk of arrhythmia-related syncope, limitations of ICD therapy might outweigh their potential therapeutic benefits. In this context the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator offers alternative therapeutical options for some high-risk patients. Herein, we review recent evidence demonstrating that wearable sensors might be useful to overcome some limitations of implantable devices in syncope management. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4315629/ /pubmed/25608536 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892147 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Review Article
Meyer, Christian
Carvalho, Paulo
Brinkmeyer, Christoph
Kelm, Malte
Couceiro, Ricardo
Mühlsteff, Jens
Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title_full Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title_fullStr Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title_short Wearable Sensors in Syncope Management
title_sort wearable sensors in syncope management
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25608536
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892147
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerchristian wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement
AT carvalhopaulo wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement
AT brinkmeyerchristoph wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement
AT kelmmalte wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement
AT couceiroricardo wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement
AT muhlsteffjens wearablesensorsinsyncopemanagement