Cargando…
Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity()
‘Impulsivity’ refers to a range of behaviours including preference for immediate reward (temporal-impulsivity) and the tendency to make premature decisions (reflection-impulsivity) and responses (motor-impulsivity). The current study aimed to examine how different behavioural and self-report measure...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.059 |
_version_ | 1782355545960742912 |
---|---|
author | Caswell, Amy J. Bond, Rod Duka, Theodora Morgan, Michael J. |
author_facet | Caswell, Amy J. Bond, Rod Duka, Theodora Morgan, Michael J. |
author_sort | Caswell, Amy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ‘Impulsivity’ refers to a range of behaviours including preference for immediate reward (temporal-impulsivity) and the tendency to make premature decisions (reflection-impulsivity) and responses (motor-impulsivity). The current study aimed to examine how different behavioural and self-report measurements of impulsivity can be categorised into distinct subtypes. Exploratory factor analysis using full information maximum likelihood was conducted on 10 behavioural and 1 self-report measure of impulsivity. Four factors of impulsivity were indicated, with Factor 1 having a high loading of the Stop Signal Task, which measures motor-impulsivity, factor 2 representing reflection-impulsivity with loadings of the Information Sampling Task and Matching Familiar Figures Task, factor 3 representing the Immediate Memory Task, and finally factor 4 which represents the Delay Discounting Questionnaire and The Monetary Choice Questionnaire, measurements of temporal-impulsivity. These findings indicated that impulsivity is not a unitary construct, and instead represents a series of independent subtypes. There was evidence of a distinct reflection-impulsivity factor, providing the first factor analysis support for this subtype. There was also support for additional factors of motor- and temporal-impulsivity. The present findings indicated that a number of currently accepted tasks cannot be considered as indexing motor- and temporal-impulsivity suggesting that additional characterisations of impulsivity may be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4316178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43161782015-04-01 Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() Caswell, Amy J. Bond, Rod Duka, Theodora Morgan, Michael J. Pers Individ Dif Article ‘Impulsivity’ refers to a range of behaviours including preference for immediate reward (temporal-impulsivity) and the tendency to make premature decisions (reflection-impulsivity) and responses (motor-impulsivity). The current study aimed to examine how different behavioural and self-report measurements of impulsivity can be categorised into distinct subtypes. Exploratory factor analysis using full information maximum likelihood was conducted on 10 behavioural and 1 self-report measure of impulsivity. Four factors of impulsivity were indicated, with Factor 1 having a high loading of the Stop Signal Task, which measures motor-impulsivity, factor 2 representing reflection-impulsivity with loadings of the Information Sampling Task and Matching Familiar Figures Task, factor 3 representing the Immediate Memory Task, and finally factor 4 which represents the Delay Discounting Questionnaire and The Monetary Choice Questionnaire, measurements of temporal-impulsivity. These findings indicated that impulsivity is not a unitary construct, and instead represents a series of independent subtypes. There was evidence of a distinct reflection-impulsivity factor, providing the first factor analysis support for this subtype. There was also support for additional factors of motor- and temporal-impulsivity. The present findings indicated that a number of currently accepted tasks cannot be considered as indexing motor- and temporal-impulsivity suggesting that additional characterisations of impulsivity may be required. Pergamon Press 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4316178/ /pubmed/25844002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.059 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Caswell, Amy J. Bond, Rod Duka, Theodora Morgan, Michael J. Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title | Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title_full | Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title_fullStr | Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title_full_unstemmed | Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title_short | Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
title_sort | further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caswellamyj furtherevidenceoftheheterogeneousnatureofimpulsivity AT bondrod furtherevidenceoftheheterogeneousnatureofimpulsivity AT dukatheodora furtherevidenceoftheheterogeneousnatureofimpulsivity AT morganmichaelj furtherevidenceoftheheterogeneousnatureofimpulsivity |