Cargando…

Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects

Background: Although single- and paired-pulse (sp/pp) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies are considered minimal risk in adults and children, the safety profile for theta-burst TMS (TBS) is unknown. Objective: In this comparative analysis, we explored the rate, severity, and specific sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Yaejee H., Wu, Steve W., Pedapati, Ernest V., Horn, Paul S., Huddleston, David A., Laue, Cameron S., Gilbert, Donald L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25698958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00029
_version_ 1782355607469162496
author Hong, Yaejee H.
Wu, Steve W.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
Horn, Paul S.
Huddleston, David A.
Laue, Cameron S.
Gilbert, Donald L.
author_facet Hong, Yaejee H.
Wu, Steve W.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
Horn, Paul S.
Huddleston, David A.
Laue, Cameron S.
Gilbert, Donald L.
author_sort Hong, Yaejee H.
collection PubMed
description Background: Although single- and paired-pulse (sp/pp) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies are considered minimal risk in adults and children, the safety profile for theta-burst TMS (TBS) is unknown. Objective: In this comparative analysis, we explored the rate, severity, and specific symptoms of TMS-related adverse effects (AEs) between sp/ppTMS and TBS in subjects between ages 6 and 18 years. Method: Data from 165 participants from 2009 to 2014 were analyzed. Assessment of AEs was performed based on baseline and post-TMS administration of a symptom-based questionnaire that rated AEs on a 5-level ordinal scale (minimal, mild, moderate, marked, severe). AE rates and severity were compared using Chi Square or Fisher’s Exact Test depending on data characteristics. Result: Overall, no seizures or severe-rated AEs were reported by 165 pediatric participants. The rate of AE in all TBS sessions was 10.5% (n = 76, 95% CI: 4.7–19.7%), whereas the rate of AE in all sp/ppTMS sessions was 12.4% (n = 89, 95% CI: 6.3–21.0%). There was no statistical difference in AE rates between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 0.71). In all sp/ppTMS and TBS sessions, 20 subjects reported a total of 35 AEs, among these 31 (~88.6%) were rated as “minimal” or “mild”. There was no difference in the severity of AE between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 1.0). Only one of 76 TBS participants reported an AE rated as more than minimal/mild. Conclusion: Our comparative analysis showed that TBS appears to be as safe as sp/ppTMS in terms of AE rate and severity. This report supports further investigation of TBS in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4316715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43167152015-02-19 Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects Hong, Yaejee H. Wu, Steve W. Pedapati, Ernest V. Horn, Paul S. Huddleston, David A. Laue, Cameron S. Gilbert, Donald L. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Although single- and paired-pulse (sp/pp) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies are considered minimal risk in adults and children, the safety profile for theta-burst TMS (TBS) is unknown. Objective: In this comparative analysis, we explored the rate, severity, and specific symptoms of TMS-related adverse effects (AEs) between sp/ppTMS and TBS in subjects between ages 6 and 18 years. Method: Data from 165 participants from 2009 to 2014 were analyzed. Assessment of AEs was performed based on baseline and post-TMS administration of a symptom-based questionnaire that rated AEs on a 5-level ordinal scale (minimal, mild, moderate, marked, severe). AE rates and severity were compared using Chi Square or Fisher’s Exact Test depending on data characteristics. Result: Overall, no seizures or severe-rated AEs were reported by 165 pediatric participants. The rate of AE in all TBS sessions was 10.5% (n = 76, 95% CI: 4.7–19.7%), whereas the rate of AE in all sp/ppTMS sessions was 12.4% (n = 89, 95% CI: 6.3–21.0%). There was no statistical difference in AE rates between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 0.71). In all sp/ppTMS and TBS sessions, 20 subjects reported a total of 35 AEs, among these 31 (~88.6%) were rated as “minimal” or “mild”. There was no difference in the severity of AE between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 1.0). Only one of 76 TBS participants reported an AE rated as more than minimal/mild. Conclusion: Our comparative analysis showed that TBS appears to be as safe as sp/ppTMS in terms of AE rate and severity. This report supports further investigation of TBS in children. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4316715/ /pubmed/25698958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00029 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hong, Wu, Pedapati, Horn, Huddleston, Laue and Gilbert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hong, Yaejee H.
Wu, Steve W.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
Horn, Paul S.
Huddleston, David A.
Laue, Cameron S.
Gilbert, Donald L.
Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title_full Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title_fullStr Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title_full_unstemmed Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title_short Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
title_sort safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25698958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00029
work_keys_str_mv AT hongyaejeeh safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT wustevew safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT pedapatiernestv safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT hornpauls safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT huddlestondavida safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT lauecamerons safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects
AT gilbertdonaldl safetyandtolerabilityofthetaburststimulationvssingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationacomparativestudyof165pediatricsubjects