Cargando…
How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privilege those at lowest risk of bias (RoB) in the synthesis. This study examines if and how critical appraisals inform the synthesis and interpretation of evidence in SRs. METHODS: All SRs published in Ma...
Autores principales: | Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Egan, Matt, Petticrew, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204711 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews
por: Shimonovich, Michal, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review
por: Igelström, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews
por: Campbell, Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Systems science methods in public health: what can they contribute to our understanding of and response to the cost-of-living crisis?
por: Höhn, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Improving Conduct and Reporting of Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Data (ICONS-Quant): protocol for a mixed methods study to develop a reporting guideline
por: Campbell, Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)