Cargando…
Peer review of human studies run amok: a break in the fiduciary relation between scientists and the public
Peer review aims to ensure the quality and credibility of research reporting. Conducted by volunteer scientists who receive no guidance or direction, peer review widely varies from fast and facilitative, to unclear and obstructive. Poor quality is an issue because most science research is publicly f...
Autores principales: | Ewing, Sarah W Feldstein, Saitz, Richard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110076 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Amok
por: Zweig, Stefan, 1881-1942
Publicado: (2003) -
The Board of Directors and Audit Committee Guide to Fiduciary Responsibilities
por: Moran, Sheila
Publicado: (2013) -
The fiduciary obligation of the physician-researcher in phase IV trials
por: Bernabe, Rosemarie DLC, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Using fixed fiduciary markers for stage drift correction
por: Lee, Sang Hak, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
When Mast Cells Run Amok: A Comprehensive Review and Case Study on Severe Neonatal Diffuse Cutaneous Mastocytosis
por: Olteanu, Emilian-Gheorghe, et al.
Publicado: (2023)