Cargando…

Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation

Various different methods are currently being used to capture data from small animal consultations. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to record detailed data from consultations by direct observation. A second aim was to investigate the complexity of the consultation by examining the number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, N. J., Brennan, M. L., Cobb, M., Dean, R. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25262057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.102548
_version_ 1782355633536761856
author Robinson, N. J.
Brennan, M. L.
Cobb, M.
Dean, R. S.
author_facet Robinson, N. J.
Brennan, M. L.
Cobb, M.
Dean, R. S.
author_sort Robinson, N. J.
collection PubMed
description Various different methods are currently being used to capture data from small animal consultations. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to record detailed data from consultations by direct observation. A second aim was to investigate the complexity of the consultation by examining the number of problems discussed per patient. A data collection tool was developed and used during direct observation of small animal consultations in eight practices. Data were recorded on consultation type, patient signalment and number of problems discussed. During 16 weeks of data collection, 1901 patients were presented. Up to eight problems were discussed for some patients; more problems were discussed during preventive medicine consultations than during first consultations (P<0.001) or revisits (P<0.001). Fewer problems were discussed for rabbits than cats (P<0.001) or dogs (P<0.001). Age was positively correlated with discussion of specific health problems and negatively correlated with discussion of preventive medicine. Consultations are complex with multiple problems frequently discussed, suggesting comorbidity may be common. Future research utilising practice data should consider how much of this complexity needs to be captured, and use appropriate methods accordingly. The findings here have implications for directing research and education as well as application in veterinary practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4316871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43168712015-02-11 Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation Robinson, N. J. Brennan, M. L. Cobb, M. Dean, R. S. Vet Rec Research Various different methods are currently being used to capture data from small animal consultations. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to record detailed data from consultations by direct observation. A second aim was to investigate the complexity of the consultation by examining the number of problems discussed per patient. A data collection tool was developed and used during direct observation of small animal consultations in eight practices. Data were recorded on consultation type, patient signalment and number of problems discussed. During 16 weeks of data collection, 1901 patients were presented. Up to eight problems were discussed for some patients; more problems were discussed during preventive medicine consultations than during first consultations (P<0.001) or revisits (P<0.001). Fewer problems were discussed for rabbits than cats (P<0.001) or dogs (P<0.001). Age was positively correlated with discussion of specific health problems and negatively correlated with discussion of preventive medicine. Consultations are complex with multiple problems frequently discussed, suggesting comorbidity may be common. Future research utilising practice data should consider how much of this complexity needs to be captured, and use appropriate methods accordingly. The findings here have implications for directing research and education as well as application in veterinary practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-01-10 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4316871/ /pubmed/25262057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.102548 Text en British Veterinary Association This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Robinson, N. J.
Brennan, M. L.
Cobb, M.
Dean, R. S.
Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title_full Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title_fullStr Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title_full_unstemmed Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title_short Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
title_sort capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25262057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.102548
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonnj capturingthecomplexityoffirstopinionsmallanimalconsultationsusingdirectobservation
AT brennanml capturingthecomplexityoffirstopinionsmallanimalconsultationsusingdirectobservation
AT cobbm capturingthecomplexityoffirstopinionsmallanimalconsultationsusingdirectobservation
AT deanrs capturingthecomplexityoffirstopinionsmallanimalconsultationsusingdirectobservation