Cargando…

Hormone replacement therapy and Parkinson’s disease risk in women: a meta-analysis of 14 observational studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Published data on the relationship of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with Parkinson’s disease (PD) were inconclusive. Thus, a systematic meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to clarify this topic. METHODS: The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were searched fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Peifu, Li, Jilai, Qiu, Shi, Wen, Honfeng, Du, Jichen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4317144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657580
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S69918
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Published data on the relationship of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with Parkinson’s disease (PD) were inconclusive. Thus, a systematic meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to clarify this topic. METHODS: The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were searched for case–control or cohort studies published up till June 2, 2014. Meta-analysis of the relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: A final total of ten case–control and four cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. The overall combined RR of PD for ever users versus never users of HRT was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.84–1.20). Limited to those subjects who only use estrogen, a similar trend was detected (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.69–1.30). In the subgroup analysis by study design, no significant association was observed in case–control studies (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.02), whereas a positive association was found in cohort studies (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10–1.40). In further analysis according to study quality, an inverse association was found in the low-quality group (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40–0.82), whereas a positive association was found in the high-quality group (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31). CONCLUSION: In summary, our results of meta-analysis do not support a protective role of HRT in female PD development.