Cargando…

Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently provided a new treatment strategy for large colorectal neoplasms, as an alternative to laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC). Prospective comparative data on the perioperative course of ESD vis-à-vis LAC are scarce. METHODS: We prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Fumihiko, Saito, Yutaka, Sakamoto, Taku, Otake, Yosuke, Nakajima, Takeshi, Yamamoto, Seiichiro, Murakami, Yoshitaka, Ishikawa, Hideki, Matsuda, Takahisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4317513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3705-5
_version_ 1782355699338051584
author Nakamura, Fumihiko
Saito, Yutaka
Sakamoto, Taku
Otake, Yosuke
Nakajima, Takeshi
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Ishikawa, Hideki
Matsuda, Takahisa
author_facet Nakamura, Fumihiko
Saito, Yutaka
Sakamoto, Taku
Otake, Yosuke
Nakajima, Takeshi
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Ishikawa, Hideki
Matsuda, Takahisa
author_sort Nakamura, Fumihiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently provided a new treatment strategy for large colorectal neoplasms, as an alternative to laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC). Prospective comparative data on the perioperative course of ESD vis-à-vis LAC are scarce. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the perioperative course of colorectal ESD in 300 patients. We evaluated en bloc and curative resection, procedure duration, postoperative parameters [white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin], pain, recovery duration (time to achieve full mobilization, normal diet, and length of hospitalization), and complications. We also prospectively evaluated 190 patients undergoing LAC as a control group. RESULTS: The median size of the lesions was 30 mm for ESDs (LACs: 20 mm). The median procedure time was 90 min for ESDs (LACs: 185 min). Postoperative pyrexia was reported in 4 % of ESDs (LACs: 54 %). Only 4 % of ESDs required analgesia (LACs: 61 %). Between the preoperative period and postoperative day 1, the mean difference in WBC and CRP was +1,300/μl for ESDs (LACs: +3,100/μl), and +0.91 mg/dl for ESDs (LACs: +3.96 mg/dl), respectively. A ≥2 g/dl decrease in hemoglobin was observed in 5 % of ESDs (LACs: 30.0 %). Complications were seen in 7 % of ESDs (LACs: 15 %). The rate of delayed bleeding and perforation was 5 and 1.7 % of ESDs, respectively. Although only one of them required laparotomy for peritonitis caused by delayed perforation, others could be managed endoscopically. Additional LAC was required in 16 ESDs due to redefined risk for lymph node metastases. The median hospital stay was 5 days for ESDs (LACs: 10 days). These were consecutive patients with prospective data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal ESD is effective, minimally invasive and safe in terms of periperative clinical course. Colorectal ESD provides advantages for treatment of large adenomas and early cancers with no risk of lymph node metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4317513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43175132015-02-06 Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy Nakamura, Fumihiko Saito, Yutaka Sakamoto, Taku Otake, Yosuke Nakajima, Takeshi Yamamoto, Seiichiro Murakami, Yoshitaka Ishikawa, Hideki Matsuda, Takahisa Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently provided a new treatment strategy for large colorectal neoplasms, as an alternative to laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC). Prospective comparative data on the perioperative course of ESD vis-à-vis LAC are scarce. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the perioperative course of colorectal ESD in 300 patients. We evaluated en bloc and curative resection, procedure duration, postoperative parameters [white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin], pain, recovery duration (time to achieve full mobilization, normal diet, and length of hospitalization), and complications. We also prospectively evaluated 190 patients undergoing LAC as a control group. RESULTS: The median size of the lesions was 30 mm for ESDs (LACs: 20 mm). The median procedure time was 90 min for ESDs (LACs: 185 min). Postoperative pyrexia was reported in 4 % of ESDs (LACs: 54 %). Only 4 % of ESDs required analgesia (LACs: 61 %). Between the preoperative period and postoperative day 1, the mean difference in WBC and CRP was +1,300/μl for ESDs (LACs: +3,100/μl), and +0.91 mg/dl for ESDs (LACs: +3.96 mg/dl), respectively. A ≥2 g/dl decrease in hemoglobin was observed in 5 % of ESDs (LACs: 30.0 %). Complications were seen in 7 % of ESDs (LACs: 15 %). The rate of delayed bleeding and perforation was 5 and 1.7 % of ESDs, respectively. Although only one of them required laparotomy for peritonitis caused by delayed perforation, others could be managed endoscopically. Additional LAC was required in 16 ESDs due to redefined risk for lymph node metastases. The median hospital stay was 5 days for ESDs (LACs: 10 days). These were consecutive patients with prospective data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal ESD is effective, minimally invasive and safe in terms of periperative clinical course. Colorectal ESD provides advantages for treatment of large adenomas and early cancers with no risk of lymph node metastasis. Springer US 2014-07-19 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4317513/ /pubmed/25037724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3705-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Nakamura, Fumihiko
Saito, Yutaka
Sakamoto, Taku
Otake, Yosuke
Nakajima, Takeshi
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Ishikawa, Hideki
Matsuda, Takahisa
Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title_full Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title_fullStr Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title_full_unstemmed Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title_short Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
title_sort potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4317513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3705-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurafumihiko potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT saitoyutaka potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT sakamototaku potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT otakeyosuke potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT nakajimatakeshi potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT yamamotoseiichiro potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT murakamiyoshitaka potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT ishikawahideki potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy
AT matsudatakahisa potentialperioperativeadvantageofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionversuslaparoscopyassistedcolectomy