Cargando…

User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya

BACKGROUND: Clinical social franchising is a rapidly growing delivery model in private healthcare markets in low- and middle-income countries. Despite this growth, little is known about providers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of social franchising or clients’ reasons for choosing franc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sieverding, Maia, Briegleb, Christina, Montagu, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25638170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0709-3
_version_ 1782355813257445376
author Sieverding, Maia
Briegleb, Christina
Montagu, Dominic
author_facet Sieverding, Maia
Briegleb, Christina
Montagu, Dominic
author_sort Sieverding, Maia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical social franchising is a rapidly growing delivery model in private healthcare markets in low- and middle-income countries. Despite this growth, little is known about providers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of social franchising or clients’ reasons for choosing franchised facilities over other healthcare options. We examine these questions in the context of three social franchise networks in Ghana and Kenya. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of providers from the BlueStar Ghana, and Amua and Tunza networks in Kenya. We also conducted qualitative exit interviews with female clients who were leaving franchised facilities after a visit for a reproductive or child health reason. The total sample consists of 47 providers and 47 clients across the three networks. RESULTS: Providers perceived the main benefits of participation in a social franchise network to be training opportunities and access to a consistent supply of low-cost family planning commodities; few providers mentioned branding as a benefit of participation. Although most providers said that client flows for franchised services increased after joining the network, they did not associate this with improved finances for their facility. Clients overwhelmingly cited the quality of the client-provider relationship as their main motivation for attending the franchise facility. Recognition of the franchise brand was low among clients who were exiting a franchised facility. CONCLUSIONS: The most important benefit of social franchise programs to both providers and their clients may have more to do with training on business practices, patient counseling and customer service, than with subsidies, technical input, branding or clinical support. This finding may lead to a reconsideration of how franchise programs interact with both their member clinics and the larger health-seeking communities they serve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4318163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43181632015-02-06 User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya Sieverding, Maia Briegleb, Christina Montagu, Dominic BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical social franchising is a rapidly growing delivery model in private healthcare markets in low- and middle-income countries. Despite this growth, little is known about providers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of social franchising or clients’ reasons for choosing franchised facilities over other healthcare options. We examine these questions in the context of three social franchise networks in Ghana and Kenya. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of providers from the BlueStar Ghana, and Amua and Tunza networks in Kenya. We also conducted qualitative exit interviews with female clients who were leaving franchised facilities after a visit for a reproductive or child health reason. The total sample consists of 47 providers and 47 clients across the three networks. RESULTS: Providers perceived the main benefits of participation in a social franchise network to be training opportunities and access to a consistent supply of low-cost family planning commodities; few providers mentioned branding as a benefit of participation. Although most providers said that client flows for franchised services increased after joining the network, they did not associate this with improved finances for their facility. Clients overwhelmingly cited the quality of the client-provider relationship as their main motivation for attending the franchise facility. Recognition of the franchise brand was low among clients who were exiting a franchised facility. CONCLUSIONS: The most important benefit of social franchise programs to both providers and their clients may have more to do with training on business practices, patient counseling and customer service, than with subsidies, technical input, branding or clinical support. This finding may lead to a reconsideration of how franchise programs interact with both their member clinics and the larger health-seeking communities they serve. BioMed Central 2015-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4318163/ /pubmed/25638170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0709-3 Text en © Sieverding et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sieverding, Maia
Briegleb, Christina
Montagu, Dominic
User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title_full User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title_fullStr User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title_full_unstemmed User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title_short User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya
title_sort user experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in ghana and kenya
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25638170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0709-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sieverdingmaia userexperienceswithclinicalsocialfranchisingqualitativeinsightsfromprovidersandclientsinghanaandkenya
AT brieglebchristina userexperienceswithclinicalsocialfranchisingqualitativeinsightsfromprovidersandclientsinghanaandkenya
AT montagudominic userexperienceswithclinicalsocialfranchisingqualitativeinsightsfromprovidersandclientsinghanaandkenya