Cargando…
Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Aphasia affects the ability to speak, comprehend spoken language, read and write. One third of stroke survivors experience aphasia. Evidence suggests that aphasia can continue to improve after the first few months with intensive speech and language therapy, which is frequently beyond wha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-014-0527-7 |
_version_ | 1782355816230158336 |
---|---|
author | Palmer, Rebecca Cooper, Cindy Enderby, Pam Brady, Marian Julious, Steven Bowen, Audrey Latimer, Nicholas |
author_facet | Palmer, Rebecca Cooper, Cindy Enderby, Pam Brady, Marian Julious, Steven Bowen, Audrey Latimer, Nicholas |
author_sort | Palmer, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aphasia affects the ability to speak, comprehend spoken language, read and write. One third of stroke survivors experience aphasia. Evidence suggests that aphasia can continue to improve after the first few months with intensive speech and language therapy, which is frequently beyond what resources allow. The development of computer software for language practice provides an opportunity for self-managed therapy. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a computerised approach to long-term aphasia therapy post stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 285 adults with aphasia at least four months post stroke will be randomly allocated to either usual care, computerised intervention in addition to usual care or attention and activity control in addition to usual care. Those in the intervention group will receive six months of self-managed word finding practice on their home computer with monthly face-to-face support from a volunteer/assistant. Those in the attention control group will receive puzzle activities, supplemented by monthly telephone calls. Study delivery will be coordinated by 20 speech and language therapy departments across the United Kingdom. Outcome measures will be made at baseline, six, nine and 12 months after randomisation by blinded speech and language therapist assessors. Primary outcomes are the change in number of words (of personal relevance) named correctly at six months and improvement in functional conversation. Primary outcomes will be analysed using a Hochberg testing procedure. Significance will be declared if differences in both word retrieval and functional conversation at six months are significant at the 5% level, or if either comparison is significant at 2.5%. A cost utility analysis will be undertaken from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Differences between costs and quality-adjusted life years in the three groups will be described and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio will be calculated. Treatment fidelity will be monitored. DISCUSSION: This is the first fully powered trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of computerised aphasia therapy. Specific challenges in designing the protocol are considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68798818 on 18 February 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4318176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43181762015-02-06 Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Palmer, Rebecca Cooper, Cindy Enderby, Pam Brady, Marian Julious, Steven Bowen, Audrey Latimer, Nicholas Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Aphasia affects the ability to speak, comprehend spoken language, read and write. One third of stroke survivors experience aphasia. Evidence suggests that aphasia can continue to improve after the first few months with intensive speech and language therapy, which is frequently beyond what resources allow. The development of computer software for language practice provides an opportunity for self-managed therapy. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a computerised approach to long-term aphasia therapy post stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 285 adults with aphasia at least four months post stroke will be randomly allocated to either usual care, computerised intervention in addition to usual care or attention and activity control in addition to usual care. Those in the intervention group will receive six months of self-managed word finding practice on their home computer with monthly face-to-face support from a volunteer/assistant. Those in the attention control group will receive puzzle activities, supplemented by monthly telephone calls. Study delivery will be coordinated by 20 speech and language therapy departments across the United Kingdom. Outcome measures will be made at baseline, six, nine and 12 months after randomisation by blinded speech and language therapist assessors. Primary outcomes are the change in number of words (of personal relevance) named correctly at six months and improvement in functional conversation. Primary outcomes will be analysed using a Hochberg testing procedure. Significance will be declared if differences in both word retrieval and functional conversation at six months are significant at the 5% level, or if either comparison is significant at 2.5%. A cost utility analysis will be undertaken from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Differences between costs and quality-adjusted life years in the three groups will be described and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio will be calculated. Treatment fidelity will be monitored. DISCUSSION: This is the first fully powered trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of computerised aphasia therapy. Specific challenges in designing the protocol are considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68798818 on 18 February 2014. BioMed Central 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4318176/ /pubmed/25623162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-014-0527-7 Text en © Palmer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Palmer, Rebecca Cooper, Cindy Enderby, Pam Brady, Marian Julious, Steven Bowen, Audrey Latimer, Nicholas Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (big cactus): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-014-0527-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmerrebecca clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coopercindy clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT enderbypam clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bradymarian clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT julioussteven clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bowenaudrey clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT latimernicholas clinicalandcosteffectivenessofcomputertreatmentforaphasiapoststrokebigcactusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |