Cargando…

Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa

BACKGROUND: Defining the anopheline mosquito vectors and their foraging behaviour in malaria endemic areas is crucial for disease control and surveillance. The standard protocol for molecular identification of host blood meals in mosquitoes is to morphologically identify fed mosquitoes and then perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Smita, Henning, Tyler C, Simubali, Limonty, Hamapumbu, Harry, Nzira, Lukwa, Mamini, Edmore, Makuwaza, Aramu, Muleba, Mbanga, Norris, Douglas E, Stevenson, Jennifer C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-014-0527-9
_version_ 1782355862398959616
author Das, Smita
Henning, Tyler C
Simubali, Limonty
Hamapumbu, Harry
Nzira, Lukwa
Mamini, Edmore
Makuwaza, Aramu
Muleba, Mbanga
Norris, Douglas E
Stevenson, Jennifer C
author_facet Das, Smita
Henning, Tyler C
Simubali, Limonty
Hamapumbu, Harry
Nzira, Lukwa
Mamini, Edmore
Makuwaza, Aramu
Muleba, Mbanga
Norris, Douglas E
Stevenson, Jennifer C
author_sort Das, Smita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Defining the anopheline mosquito vectors and their foraging behaviour in malaria endemic areas is crucial for disease control and surveillance. The standard protocol for molecular identification of host blood meals in mosquitoes is to morphologically identify fed mosquitoes and then perform polymerase chain reaction (PCR), precipitin tests, or ELISA assays. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the feeding rate and human blood indices (HBIs) of malaria vectors were underestimated when molecular confirmation by PCR was performed on both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes. METHODS: In association with the Southern Africa International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICEMR), mosquito collections were performed at three sites: Choma district in southern Zambia, Nchelenge district in northern Zambia, and Mutasa district in eastern Zimbabwe. All anophelines were classified visually as fed or unfed, and tested for blood meal species using PCR methods. The HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes were compared to the HBIs of overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes by Pearson’s Chi-Square Test of Independence. RESULTS: The mosquito collections consisted of Anopheles arabiensis from Choma, Anopheles funestus s.s., Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles leesoni from Nchelenge, and An. funestus s.s. and An. leesoni from Mutasa. The malaria vectors at all three sites had large human blood indices (HBI) suggesting high anthropophily. When only visually fed mosquitoes tested by PCR for blood meal species were compared to testing those classified as both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes, it was found that the proportion blooded was underestimated by up to 18.7%. For most Anopheles species at each site, there was a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between the HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes and that of the overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: The impact on HBI of analysing both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes varied from site to site. This discrepancy may be due to partial blood feeding behaviour by mosquitoes, digestion of blood meals, sample condition, and/or expertise of entomology field staff. It is important to perform molecular testing on all mosquitoes to accurately characterize vector feeding behaviour and develop interventions in malaria endemic areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4318541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43185412015-02-06 Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa Das, Smita Henning, Tyler C Simubali, Limonty Hamapumbu, Harry Nzira, Lukwa Mamini, Edmore Makuwaza, Aramu Muleba, Mbanga Norris, Douglas E Stevenson, Jennifer C Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Defining the anopheline mosquito vectors and their foraging behaviour in malaria endemic areas is crucial for disease control and surveillance. The standard protocol for molecular identification of host blood meals in mosquitoes is to morphologically identify fed mosquitoes and then perform polymerase chain reaction (PCR), precipitin tests, or ELISA assays. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the feeding rate and human blood indices (HBIs) of malaria vectors were underestimated when molecular confirmation by PCR was performed on both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes. METHODS: In association with the Southern Africa International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICEMR), mosquito collections were performed at three sites: Choma district in southern Zambia, Nchelenge district in northern Zambia, and Mutasa district in eastern Zimbabwe. All anophelines were classified visually as fed or unfed, and tested for blood meal species using PCR methods. The HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes were compared to the HBIs of overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes by Pearson’s Chi-Square Test of Independence. RESULTS: The mosquito collections consisted of Anopheles arabiensis from Choma, Anopheles funestus s.s., Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles leesoni from Nchelenge, and An. funestus s.s. and An. leesoni from Mutasa. The malaria vectors at all three sites had large human blood indices (HBI) suggesting high anthropophily. When only visually fed mosquitoes tested by PCR for blood meal species were compared to testing those classified as both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes, it was found that the proportion blooded was underestimated by up to 18.7%. For most Anopheles species at each site, there was a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between the HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes and that of the overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: The impact on HBI of analysing both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes varied from site to site. This discrepancy may be due to partial blood feeding behaviour by mosquitoes, digestion of blood meals, sample condition, and/or expertise of entomology field staff. It is important to perform molecular testing on all mosquitoes to accurately characterize vector feeding behaviour and develop interventions in malaria endemic areas. BioMed Central 2015-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4318541/ /pubmed/25927429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-014-0527-9 Text en © Das et al.; licensee Biomed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Das, Smita
Henning, Tyler C
Simubali, Limonty
Hamapumbu, Harry
Nzira, Lukwa
Mamini, Edmore
Makuwaza, Aramu
Muleba, Mbanga
Norris, Douglas E
Stevenson, Jennifer C
Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title_full Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title_fullStr Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title_full_unstemmed Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title_short Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa
title_sort underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-014-0527-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dassmita underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT henningtylerc underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT simubalilimonty underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT hamapumbuharry underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT nziralukwa underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT maminiedmore underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT makuwazaaramu underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT mulebambanga underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT norrisdouglase underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT stevensonjenniferc underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica
AT underestimationofforagingbehaviourbystandardfieldmethodsinmalariavectormosquitoesinsouthernafrica