Cargando…
Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559 |
_version_ | 1782356015251980288 |
---|---|
author | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Stürner, Klarissa Hanja Young, Kim Lea Siemonsen, Susanne Friede, Tim Heesen, Christoph |
author_facet | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Stürner, Klarissa Hanja Young, Kim Lea Siemonsen, Susanne Friede, Tim Heesen, Christoph |
author_sort | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment trials. OBJECTIVES: To quantify regression-to-the-mean and identify predictors of MRI lesion development in placebo cohorts. METHODS: 21 Phase-2 and Phase-3 trials were identified by a systematic literature research. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate development of T2 and GD+ after 6 months (phase-2) or 2 years (phase-3). Predictors of lesion development were evaluated with mixed-effect meta-regression. RESULTS: The mean number of GD+-lesions per scan was similar after 6 months (1.19, 95%CI: 0.87-1.51) and 2 years (1.19, 95%CI: 1.00-1.39). 39% of the patients were without new T2-lesion after 6 month and 19% after 2 years (95%CI: 12-25%). Mean number of baseline GD+-lesions was the best predictor for new lesions after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Baseline GD-enhancing lesions predict evolution of Gd- and T2 lesions after 6 months and might be used to control for regression to the mean effects. Overall, proof-of-concept studies with a baseline to treatment design have to face a regression to 1.2 GD+lesions per scan within 6 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4319835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43198352015-02-18 Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Stürner, Klarissa Hanja Young, Kim Lea Siemonsen, Susanne Friede, Tim Heesen, Christoph PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment trials. OBJECTIVES: To quantify regression-to-the-mean and identify predictors of MRI lesion development in placebo cohorts. METHODS: 21 Phase-2 and Phase-3 trials were identified by a systematic literature research. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate development of T2 and GD+ after 6 months (phase-2) or 2 years (phase-3). Predictors of lesion development were evaluated with mixed-effect meta-regression. RESULTS: The mean number of GD+-lesions per scan was similar after 6 months (1.19, 95%CI: 0.87-1.51) and 2 years (1.19, 95%CI: 1.00-1.39). 39% of the patients were without new T2-lesion after 6 month and 19% after 2 years (95%CI: 12-25%). Mean number of baseline GD+-lesions was the best predictor for new lesions after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Baseline GD-enhancing lesions predict evolution of Gd- and T2 lesions after 6 months and might be used to control for regression to the mean effects. Overall, proof-of-concept studies with a baseline to treatment design have to face a regression to 1.2 GD+lesions per scan within 6 months. Public Library of Science 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4319835/ /pubmed/25659100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559 Text en © 2015 Stellmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Stürner, Klarissa Hanja Young, Kim Lea Siemonsen, Susanne Friede, Tim Heesen, Christoph Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title | Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title_full | Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title_fullStr | Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title_full_unstemmed | Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title_short | Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? |
title_sort | regression to the mean and predictors of mri disease activity in rrms placebo cohorts - is there a place for baseline-to-treatment studies in ms? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stellmannjanpatrick regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms AT sturnerklarissahanja regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms AT youngkimlea regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms AT siemonsensusanne regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms AT friedetim regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms AT heesenchristoph regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms |