Cargando…

Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?

BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stellmann, Jan-Patrick, Stürner, Klarissa Hanja, Young, Kim Lea, Siemonsen, Susanne, Friede, Tim, Heesen, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559
_version_ 1782356015251980288
author Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Stürner, Klarissa Hanja
Young, Kim Lea
Siemonsen, Susanne
Friede, Tim
Heesen, Christoph
author_facet Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Stürner, Klarissa Hanja
Young, Kim Lea
Siemonsen, Susanne
Friede, Tim
Heesen, Christoph
author_sort Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment trials. OBJECTIVES: To quantify regression-to-the-mean and identify predictors of MRI lesion development in placebo cohorts. METHODS: 21 Phase-2 and Phase-3 trials were identified by a systematic literature research. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate development of T2 and GD+ after 6 months (phase-2) or 2 years (phase-3). Predictors of lesion development were evaluated with mixed-effect meta-regression. RESULTS: The mean number of GD+-lesions per scan was similar after 6 months (1.19, 95%CI: 0.87-1.51) and 2 years (1.19, 95%CI: 1.00-1.39). 39% of the patients were without new T2-lesion after 6 month and 19% after 2 years (95%CI: 12-25%). Mean number of baseline GD+-lesions was the best predictor for new lesions after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Baseline GD-enhancing lesions predict evolution of Gd- and T2 lesions after 6 months and might be used to control for regression to the mean effects. Overall, proof-of-concept studies with a baseline to treatment design have to face a regression to 1.2 GD+lesions per scan within 6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4319835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43198352015-02-18 Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS? Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Stürner, Klarissa Hanja Young, Kim Lea Siemonsen, Susanne Friede, Tim Heesen, Christoph PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-enhancing (GD+) lesions and T2 lesions are MRI outcomes for phase-2 treatment trials in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Little is known about predictors of lesion development and regression-to-the-mean, which is an important aspect in early baseline-to-treatment trials. OBJECTIVES: To quantify regression-to-the-mean and identify predictors of MRI lesion development in placebo cohorts. METHODS: 21 Phase-2 and Phase-3 trials were identified by a systematic literature research. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate development of T2 and GD+ after 6 months (phase-2) or 2 years (phase-3). Predictors of lesion development were evaluated with mixed-effect meta-regression. RESULTS: The mean number of GD+-lesions per scan was similar after 6 months (1.19, 95%CI: 0.87-1.51) and 2 years (1.19, 95%CI: 1.00-1.39). 39% of the patients were without new T2-lesion after 6 month and 19% after 2 years (95%CI: 12-25%). Mean number of baseline GD+-lesions was the best predictor for new lesions after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Baseline GD-enhancing lesions predict evolution of Gd- and T2 lesions after 6 months and might be used to control for regression to the mean effects. Overall, proof-of-concept studies with a baseline to treatment design have to face a regression to 1.2 GD+lesions per scan within 6 months. Public Library of Science 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4319835/ /pubmed/25659100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559 Text en © 2015 Stellmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Stürner, Klarissa Hanja
Young, Kim Lea
Siemonsen, Susanne
Friede, Tim
Heesen, Christoph
Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title_full Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title_fullStr Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title_full_unstemmed Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title_short Regression to the Mean and Predictors of MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Placebo Cohorts - Is There a Place for Baseline-to-Treatment Studies in MS?
title_sort regression to the mean and predictors of mri disease activity in rrms placebo cohorts - is there a place for baseline-to-treatment studies in ms?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116559
work_keys_str_mv AT stellmannjanpatrick regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms
AT sturnerklarissahanja regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms
AT youngkimlea regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms
AT siemonsensusanne regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms
AT friedetim regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms
AT heesenchristoph regressiontothemeanandpredictorsofmridiseaseactivityinrrmsplacebocohortsisthereaplaceforbaselinetotreatmentstudiesinms