Cargando…

Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources

McNemar’s test and the Pearson Chi-square were used to assess the co-detection and observed frequency, respectively, for potentially virulent E. coli genes in river water. Conventional multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays confirmed the presence of the aggR gene (69%), ipaH gene (23%) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndlovu, Thando, Le Roux, Marcellous, Khan, Wesaal, Khan, Sehaam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116808
_version_ 1782356050856378368
author Ndlovu, Thando
Le Roux, Marcellous
Khan, Wesaal
Khan, Sehaam
author_facet Ndlovu, Thando
Le Roux, Marcellous
Khan, Wesaal
Khan, Sehaam
author_sort Ndlovu, Thando
collection PubMed
description McNemar’s test and the Pearson Chi-square were used to assess the co-detection and observed frequency, respectively, for potentially virulent E. coli genes in river water. Conventional multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays confirmed the presence of the aggR gene (69%), ipaH gene (23%) and the stx gene (15%) carried by Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Enterohermorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), respectively, in river water samples collected from the Berg River (Paarl, South Africa). Only the aggR gene was present in 23% of samples collected from the Plankenburg River system (Stellenbosch, South Africa). In a comparative study, real-time multiplex PCR assays confirmed the presence of aggR (EAEC) in 69%, stx (EHEC) in 15%, ipaH (EIEC) in 31% and eae (EPEC) in 8% of the river water samples collected from the Berg River. In the Plankenburg River, aggR (EAEC) was detected in 46% of the samples, while eae (EPEC) was present in 15% of the water samples analyzed using real-time multiplex PCR in the Plankenburg River. Pearson Chi-square showed that there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between the conventional and real-time multiplex PCRs for the detection of virulent E. coli genes in water samples. However, the McNemar’s test showed some variation in the co-detection of virulent E. coli genes, for example, there was no statistical difference in the misclassification of the discordant results for stx versus ipaH, which implies that the ipaH gene was frequently detected with the stx gene. This study thus highlights the presence of virulent E. coli genes in river water and while early detection is crucial, quantitative microbial risk analysis has to be performed to identify and estimate the risk to human health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43200552015-02-18 Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources Ndlovu, Thando Le Roux, Marcellous Khan, Wesaal Khan, Sehaam PLoS One Research Article McNemar’s test and the Pearson Chi-square were used to assess the co-detection and observed frequency, respectively, for potentially virulent E. coli genes in river water. Conventional multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays confirmed the presence of the aggR gene (69%), ipaH gene (23%) and the stx gene (15%) carried by Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Enterohermorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), respectively, in river water samples collected from the Berg River (Paarl, South Africa). Only the aggR gene was present in 23% of samples collected from the Plankenburg River system (Stellenbosch, South Africa). In a comparative study, real-time multiplex PCR assays confirmed the presence of aggR (EAEC) in 69%, stx (EHEC) in 15%, ipaH (EIEC) in 31% and eae (EPEC) in 8% of the river water samples collected from the Berg River. In the Plankenburg River, aggR (EAEC) was detected in 46% of the samples, while eae (EPEC) was present in 15% of the water samples analyzed using real-time multiplex PCR in the Plankenburg River. Pearson Chi-square showed that there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between the conventional and real-time multiplex PCRs for the detection of virulent E. coli genes in water samples. However, the McNemar’s test showed some variation in the co-detection of virulent E. coli genes, for example, there was no statistical difference in the misclassification of the discordant results for stx versus ipaH, which implies that the ipaH gene was frequently detected with the stx gene. This study thus highlights the presence of virulent E. coli genes in river water and while early detection is crucial, quantitative microbial risk analysis has to be performed to identify and estimate the risk to human health. Public Library of Science 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4320055/ /pubmed/25659126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116808 Text en © 2015 Ndlovu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ndlovu, Thando
Le Roux, Marcellous
Khan, Wesaal
Khan, Sehaam
Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title_full Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title_fullStr Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title_full_unstemmed Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title_short Co-Detection of Virulent Escherichia coli Genes in Surface Water Sources
title_sort co-detection of virulent escherichia coli genes in surface water sources
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116808
work_keys_str_mv AT ndlovuthando codetectionofvirulentescherichiacoligenesinsurfacewatersources
AT lerouxmarcellous codetectionofvirulentescherichiacoligenesinsurfacewatersources
AT khanwesaal codetectionofvirulentescherichiacoligenesinsurfacewatersources
AT khansehaam codetectionofvirulentescherichiacoligenesinsurfacewatersources