Cargando…

Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system

INTRODUCTION: Both ventricular and parenchymal devices are available for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). The Hummingbird(®) Synergy Ventricular System is a novel device allowing multi-parametric neurological monitoring, including both ventricular and parenchymal ICP. The purpose of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berlin, Tracey, Murray-Krezan, Cristina, Yonas, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-10
_version_ 1782356079582117888
author Berlin, Tracey
Murray-Krezan, Cristina
Yonas, Howard
author_facet Berlin, Tracey
Murray-Krezan, Cristina
Yonas, Howard
author_sort Berlin, Tracey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Both ventricular and parenchymal devices are available for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). The Hummingbird(®) Synergy Ventricular System is a novel device allowing multi-parametric neurological monitoring, including both ventricular and parenchymal ICP. The purpose of this study is to compare the congruence of the device’s ventricular and parenchymal ICP readings. METHODS: This single-center, quantitative, interventional study compared parenchymal and ventricular ICP readings from 35 patients with the Hummingbird(®) System. If a difference of > ± 3 mmHg existed between an individual patient’s parenchymal and ventricular values, progressive intervention strategies were applied to correct identified issues. RESULTS: From a total of 2,259 observations, statistical analysis revealed congruence (within ±0-3 mmHg) of 93% of readings comparing parenchymal and ventricular ICP. Of the observations requiring intervention, 58% involved the parenchymal component, 30% involved the ventricular component, and 12% involved both components. Following prescribed interventions, 98% of readings became congruent (within ±0-3 mmHg). The adjusted mean difference between the two methods was -0.95 (95% CI: -0.97,-0.93) mmHg and all mean ICP readings fell between -2 and 2 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The Hummingbird(®) Synergy Ventricular System demonstrates congruence between ventricular and parenchymal ICP measurements within accepted parameters. Interventions required to realign parenchymal and ventricular readings serve as reminders to clinicians to be vigilant with catheter/cable connections and to maintain appropriate positioning of the ventricular drainage system. The results of this study support the recommendation to use the parenchymal ICP component for routine ICP monitoring, allowing dedication of the ventricular catheter to drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43201872015-02-11 Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system Berlin, Tracey Murray-Krezan, Cristina Yonas, Howard Springerplus Research INTRODUCTION: Both ventricular and parenchymal devices are available for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). The Hummingbird(®) Synergy Ventricular System is a novel device allowing multi-parametric neurological monitoring, including both ventricular and parenchymal ICP. The purpose of this study is to compare the congruence of the device’s ventricular and parenchymal ICP readings. METHODS: This single-center, quantitative, interventional study compared parenchymal and ventricular ICP readings from 35 patients with the Hummingbird(®) System. If a difference of > ± 3 mmHg existed between an individual patient’s parenchymal and ventricular values, progressive intervention strategies were applied to correct identified issues. RESULTS: From a total of 2,259 observations, statistical analysis revealed congruence (within ±0-3 mmHg) of 93% of readings comparing parenchymal and ventricular ICP. Of the observations requiring intervention, 58% involved the parenchymal component, 30% involved the ventricular component, and 12% involved both components. Following prescribed interventions, 98% of readings became congruent (within ±0-3 mmHg). The adjusted mean difference between the two methods was -0.95 (95% CI: -0.97,-0.93) mmHg and all mean ICP readings fell between -2 and 2 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The Hummingbird(®) Synergy Ventricular System demonstrates congruence between ventricular and parenchymal ICP measurements within accepted parameters. Interventions required to realign parenchymal and ventricular readings serve as reminders to clinicians to be vigilant with catheter/cable connections and to maintain appropriate positioning of the ventricular drainage system. The results of this study support the recommendation to use the parenchymal ICP component for routine ICP monitoring, allowing dedication of the ventricular catheter to drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Springer International Publishing 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4320187/ /pubmed/25674495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-10 Text en © Berlin et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Berlin, Tracey
Murray-Krezan, Cristina
Yonas, Howard
Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title_full Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title_fullStr Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title_short Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
title_sort comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-10
work_keys_str_mv AT berlintracey comparisonofparenchymalandventricularintracranialpressurereadingsutilizinganovelmultiparameterintracranialaccesssystem
AT murraykrezancristina comparisonofparenchymalandventricularintracranialpressurereadingsutilizinganovelmultiparameterintracranialaccesssystem
AT yonashoward comparisonofparenchymalandventricularintracranialpressurereadingsutilizinganovelmultiparameterintracranialaccesssystem