Cargando…
A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550 |
_version_ | 1782356084909932544 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Jacques P Davison, Kenneth S Olszynski, Wojciech P Beattie, Karen A Adachi, Jonathan D |
author_facet | Brown, Jacques P Davison, Kenneth S Olszynski, Wojciech P Beattie, Karen A Adachi, Jonathan D |
author_sort | Brown, Jacques P |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant selected for full paper review and abstraction. RESULTS: Multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of substantial size and duration have established the anti-fracture efficacy and safety of brand amino-bisphosphonates. For regulatory approval, generic versions of brand drugs need to demonstrate bioequivalence in young, healthy volunteers and have similar dissolution times. While the potency and amount of active drug within generic formulations must be identical to the brand, differences are permitted in the excipients. Significant differences in tablet disintegration time among different versions of generic and brand alendronate have been reported. Rapidly disintegrating alendronate pills may increase oesophageal bioadhesion and adverse event risk. Oesophageal-bound alendronate or slow disintegrating alendronate tablets may be made inert and ineffective by subsequently ingested food or drink. Investigations have reported a lower persistence to therapy with generic brands of alendronate as compared to brand bisphosphonates and patients switched from brand to generic alendronate have increased adverse event rates and losses in bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Numerous differences exist between brand and generic alendronate including: disintegration time, bioadhesion to the oesophagus, patient persistence to therapy, adverse event incidence, and maintenance of bone mineral density. Generic forms of alendronate warrant closer clinical study before they are ascribed the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of brand alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-550) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4320211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43202112015-02-11 A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis Brown, Jacques P Davison, Kenneth S Olszynski, Wojciech P Beattie, Karen A Adachi, Jonathan D Springerplus Review OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant selected for full paper review and abstraction. RESULTS: Multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of substantial size and duration have established the anti-fracture efficacy and safety of brand amino-bisphosphonates. For regulatory approval, generic versions of brand drugs need to demonstrate bioequivalence in young, healthy volunteers and have similar dissolution times. While the potency and amount of active drug within generic formulations must be identical to the brand, differences are permitted in the excipients. Significant differences in tablet disintegration time among different versions of generic and brand alendronate have been reported. Rapidly disintegrating alendronate pills may increase oesophageal bioadhesion and adverse event risk. Oesophageal-bound alendronate or slow disintegrating alendronate tablets may be made inert and ineffective by subsequently ingested food or drink. Investigations have reported a lower persistence to therapy with generic brands of alendronate as compared to brand bisphosphonates and patients switched from brand to generic alendronate have increased adverse event rates and losses in bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Numerous differences exist between brand and generic alendronate including: disintegration time, bioadhesion to the oesophagus, patient persistence to therapy, adverse event incidence, and maintenance of bone mineral density. Generic forms of alendronate warrant closer clinical study before they are ascribed the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of brand alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-550) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4320211/ /pubmed/25674402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550 Text en © Brown et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Brown, Jacques P Davison, Kenneth S Olszynski, Wojciech P Beattie, Karen A Adachi, Jonathan D A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title | A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title_full | A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title_fullStr | A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title_short | A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
title_sort | critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownjacquesp acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT davisonkenneths acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT olszynskiwojciechp acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT beattiekarena acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT adachijonathand acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT brownjacquesp criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT davisonkenneths criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT olszynskiwojciechp criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT beattiekarena criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis AT adachijonathand criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis |