Cargando…

A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Jacques P, Davison, Kenneth S, Olszynski, Wojciech P, Beattie, Karen A, Adachi, Jonathan D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550
_version_ 1782356084909932544
author Brown, Jacques P
Davison, Kenneth S
Olszynski, Wojciech P
Beattie, Karen A
Adachi, Jonathan D
author_facet Brown, Jacques P
Davison, Kenneth S
Olszynski, Wojciech P
Beattie, Karen A
Adachi, Jonathan D
author_sort Brown, Jacques P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant selected for full paper review and abstraction. RESULTS: Multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of substantial size and duration have established the anti-fracture efficacy and safety of brand amino-bisphosphonates. For regulatory approval, generic versions of brand drugs need to demonstrate bioequivalence in young, healthy volunteers and have similar dissolution times. While the potency and amount of active drug within generic formulations must be identical to the brand, differences are permitted in the excipients. Significant differences in tablet disintegration time among different versions of generic and brand alendronate have been reported. Rapidly disintegrating alendronate pills may increase oesophageal bioadhesion and adverse event risk. Oesophageal-bound alendronate or slow disintegrating alendronate tablets may be made inert and ineffective by subsequently ingested food or drink. Investigations have reported a lower persistence to therapy with generic brands of alendronate as compared to brand bisphosphonates and patients switched from brand to generic alendronate have increased adverse event rates and losses in bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Numerous differences exist between brand and generic alendronate including: disintegration time, bioadhesion to the oesophagus, patient persistence to therapy, adverse event incidence, and maintenance of bone mineral density. Generic forms of alendronate warrant closer clinical study before they are ascribed the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of brand alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-550) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43202112015-02-11 A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis Brown, Jacques P Davison, Kenneth S Olszynski, Wojciech P Beattie, Karen A Adachi, Jonathan D Springerplus Review OBJECTIVE: Compare in vitro and in vivo characteristics and clinical outcomes of brand and generic alendronate. Research design and methods: Relevant search terms were input into Medline ("alendronate" AND "generic" up to August 5, 2013) and any abstracts deemed possibly relevant selected for full paper review and abstraction. RESULTS: Multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of substantial size and duration have established the anti-fracture efficacy and safety of brand amino-bisphosphonates. For regulatory approval, generic versions of brand drugs need to demonstrate bioequivalence in young, healthy volunteers and have similar dissolution times. While the potency and amount of active drug within generic formulations must be identical to the brand, differences are permitted in the excipients. Significant differences in tablet disintegration time among different versions of generic and brand alendronate have been reported. Rapidly disintegrating alendronate pills may increase oesophageal bioadhesion and adverse event risk. Oesophageal-bound alendronate or slow disintegrating alendronate tablets may be made inert and ineffective by subsequently ingested food or drink. Investigations have reported a lower persistence to therapy with generic brands of alendronate as compared to brand bisphosphonates and patients switched from brand to generic alendronate have increased adverse event rates and losses in bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Numerous differences exist between brand and generic alendronate including: disintegration time, bioadhesion to the oesophagus, patient persistence to therapy, adverse event incidence, and maintenance of bone mineral density. Generic forms of alendronate warrant closer clinical study before they are ascribed the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of brand alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-550) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4320211/ /pubmed/25674402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550 Text en © Brown et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Brown, Jacques P
Davison, Kenneth S
Olszynski, Wojciech P
Beattie, Karen A
Adachi, Jonathan D
A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_full A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_fullStr A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_short A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
title_sort critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-550
work_keys_str_mv AT brownjacquesp acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT davisonkenneths acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT olszynskiwojciechp acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT beattiekarena acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT adachijonathand acriticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT brownjacquesp criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT davisonkenneths criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT olszynskiwojciechp criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT beattiekarena criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis
AT adachijonathand criticalreviewofbrandandgenericalendronateforthetreatmentofosteoporosis