Cargando…

Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. Objectives: The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubio-Palau, Josep, Garcia-Linares, Jordi, Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio, González-Lagunas, Javier, Raspall-Martin, Guillermo, Mareque-Bueno, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475772
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20009
_version_ 1782356107616845824
author Rubio-Palau, Josep
Garcia-Linares, Jordi
Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio
González-Lagunas, Javier
Raspall-Martin, Guillermo
Mareque-Bueno, Javier
author_facet Rubio-Palau, Josep
Garcia-Linares, Jordi
Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio
González-Lagunas, Javier
Raspall-Martin, Guillermo
Mareque-Bueno, Javier
author_sort Rubio-Palau, Josep
collection PubMed
description Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. Objectives: The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. Study Design: The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d’Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). Results: 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. Conclusions: A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance. Key words:Alveolar osteitis, dry socket, chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel, mandibular third molar surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43204142015-02-13 Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial Rubio-Palau, Josep Garcia-Linares, Jordi Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio González-Lagunas, Javier Raspall-Martin, Guillermo Mareque-Bueno, Javier Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective. Objectives: The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO. Study Design: The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d’Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients). Results: 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses. Conclusions: A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance. Key words:Alveolar osteitis, dry socket, chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel, mandibular third molar surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2015-01 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4320414/ /pubmed/25475772 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20009 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rubio-Palau, Josep
Garcia-Linares, Jordi
Hueto-Madrid, Juan-Antonio
González-Lagunas, Javier
Raspall-Martin, Guillermo
Mareque-Bueno, Javier
Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_full Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_short Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_sort effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. a double-blind randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475772
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20009
work_keys_str_mv AT rubiopalaujosep effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT garcialinaresjordi effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT huetomadridjuanantonio effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gonzalezlagunasjavier effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raspallmartinguillermo effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marequebuenojavier effectofintraalveolarplacementof02chlorhexidinebioadhesivegelontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingtheextractionofmandibularthirdmolarsadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial