Cargando…
A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25523497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169 |
_version_ | 1782356115662569472 |
---|---|
author | Wolff, Jamie Parker, Claire Borisoff, Jaimie Mortenson, W Ben Mattie, Johanne |
author_facet | Wolff, Jamie Parker, Claire Borisoff, Jaimie Mortenson, W Ben Mattie, Johanne |
author_sort | Wolff, Jamie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was undertaken to explore perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on reasons for use of exoskeleton technology, and the importance of a variety of device characteristics. METHODS: An online survey with quantitative and qualitative components was conducted with wheelchair users and healthcare professionals working directly with individuals with mobility impairments. Respondents rated whether they would use or recommend an exoskeleton for four potential reasons. Seventeen design features were rated and compared in terms of their importance. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to categorize the 17 design features into meaningful groupings. Content analysis was used to identify themes for the open ended questions regarding reasons for use of an exoskeleton. RESULTS: 481 survey responses were analyzed, 354 from wheelchair users and 127 from healthcare professionals. The most highly rated reason for potential use or recommendation of an exoskeleton was health benefits. Of the design features, 4 had a median rating of very important: minimization of falls risk, comfort, putting on/taking off the device, and purchase cost. Factor analysis identified two main categories of design features: Functional Activities and Technology Characteristics. Qualitative findings indicated that health and physical benefits, use for activity and access reasons, and psychosocial benefits were important considerations in whether to use or recommend an exoskeleton. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of developing future exoskeletons that are comfortable, affordable, minimize fall risk, and enable functional activities. Findings from this study can be utilized to inform the priorities for future development of this technology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-169) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4320449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43204492015-02-08 A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology Wolff, Jamie Parker, Claire Borisoff, Jaimie Mortenson, W Ben Mattie, Johanne J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was undertaken to explore perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on reasons for use of exoskeleton technology, and the importance of a variety of device characteristics. METHODS: An online survey with quantitative and qualitative components was conducted with wheelchair users and healthcare professionals working directly with individuals with mobility impairments. Respondents rated whether they would use or recommend an exoskeleton for four potential reasons. Seventeen design features were rated and compared in terms of their importance. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to categorize the 17 design features into meaningful groupings. Content analysis was used to identify themes for the open ended questions regarding reasons for use of an exoskeleton. RESULTS: 481 survey responses were analyzed, 354 from wheelchair users and 127 from healthcare professionals. The most highly rated reason for potential use or recommendation of an exoskeleton was health benefits. Of the design features, 4 had a median rating of very important: minimization of falls risk, comfort, putting on/taking off the device, and purchase cost. Factor analysis identified two main categories of design features: Functional Activities and Technology Characteristics. Qualitative findings indicated that health and physical benefits, use for activity and access reasons, and psychosocial benefits were important considerations in whether to use or recommend an exoskeleton. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of developing future exoskeletons that are comfortable, affordable, minimize fall risk, and enable functional activities. Findings from this study can be utilized to inform the priorities for future development of this technology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-169) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4320449/ /pubmed/25523497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169 Text en © Wolff et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wolff, Jamie Parker, Claire Borisoff, Jaimie Mortenson, W Ben Mattie, Johanne A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title | A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title_full | A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title_fullStr | A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title_short | A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
title_sort | survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25523497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffjamie asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT parkerclaire asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT borisoffjaimie asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT mortensonwben asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT mattiejohanne asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT wolffjamie surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT parkerclaire surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT borisoffjaimie surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT mortensonwben surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology AT mattiejohanne surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology |