Cargando…

A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology

BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolff, Jamie, Parker, Claire, Borisoff, Jaimie, Mortenson, W Ben, Mattie, Johanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25523497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169
_version_ 1782356115662569472
author Wolff, Jamie
Parker, Claire
Borisoff, Jaimie
Mortenson, W Ben
Mattie, Johanne
author_facet Wolff, Jamie
Parker, Claire
Borisoff, Jaimie
Mortenson, W Ben
Mattie, Johanne
author_sort Wolff, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was undertaken to explore perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on reasons for use of exoskeleton technology, and the importance of a variety of device characteristics. METHODS: An online survey with quantitative and qualitative components was conducted with wheelchair users and healthcare professionals working directly with individuals with mobility impairments. Respondents rated whether they would use or recommend an exoskeleton for four potential reasons. Seventeen design features were rated and compared in terms of their importance. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to categorize the 17 design features into meaningful groupings. Content analysis was used to identify themes for the open ended questions regarding reasons for use of an exoskeleton. RESULTS: 481 survey responses were analyzed, 354 from wheelchair users and 127 from healthcare professionals. The most highly rated reason for potential use or recommendation of an exoskeleton was health benefits. Of the design features, 4 had a median rating of very important: minimization of falls risk, comfort, putting on/taking off the device, and purchase cost. Factor analysis identified two main categories of design features: Functional Activities and Technology Characteristics. Qualitative findings indicated that health and physical benefits, use for activity and access reasons, and psychosocial benefits were important considerations in whether to use or recommend an exoskeleton. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of developing future exoskeletons that are comfortable, affordable, minimize fall risk, and enable functional activities. Findings from this study can be utilized to inform the priorities for future development of this technology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-169) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43204492015-02-08 A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology Wolff, Jamie Parker, Claire Borisoff, Jaimie Mortenson, W Ben Mattie, Johanne J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users’ health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. To further understand potential exoskeleton use, and facilitate the development of new technologies, a study was undertaken to explore perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on reasons for use of exoskeleton technology, and the importance of a variety of device characteristics. METHODS: An online survey with quantitative and qualitative components was conducted with wheelchair users and healthcare professionals working directly with individuals with mobility impairments. Respondents rated whether they would use or recommend an exoskeleton for four potential reasons. Seventeen design features were rated and compared in terms of their importance. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to categorize the 17 design features into meaningful groupings. Content analysis was used to identify themes for the open ended questions regarding reasons for use of an exoskeleton. RESULTS: 481 survey responses were analyzed, 354 from wheelchair users and 127 from healthcare professionals. The most highly rated reason for potential use or recommendation of an exoskeleton was health benefits. Of the design features, 4 had a median rating of very important: minimization of falls risk, comfort, putting on/taking off the device, and purchase cost. Factor analysis identified two main categories of design features: Functional Activities and Technology Characteristics. Qualitative findings indicated that health and physical benefits, use for activity and access reasons, and psychosocial benefits were important considerations in whether to use or recommend an exoskeleton. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of developing future exoskeletons that are comfortable, affordable, minimize fall risk, and enable functional activities. Findings from this study can be utilized to inform the priorities for future development of this technology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-169) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4320449/ /pubmed/25523497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169 Text en © Wolff et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wolff, Jamie
Parker, Claire
Borisoff, Jaimie
Mortenson, W Ben
Mattie, Johanne
A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title_full A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title_fullStr A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title_full_unstemmed A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title_short A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
title_sort survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25523497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-169
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffjamie asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT parkerclaire asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT borisoffjaimie asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT mortensonwben asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT mattiejohanne asurveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT wolffjamie surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT parkerclaire surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT borisoffjaimie surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT mortensonwben surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology
AT mattiejohanne surveyofstakeholderperspectivesonexoskeletontechnology