Cargando…

Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing global recognition of the role of emergency medical services in improving population health. Emergency medical services remain underdeveloped in many low income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. There have been no previous evaluations of specialist eme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coyle, Rachel M, Harrison, Hooi-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4
_version_ 1782356119668129792
author Coyle, Rachel M
Harrison, Hooi-Ling
author_facet Coyle, Rachel M
Harrison, Hooi-Ling
author_sort Coyle, Rachel M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing global recognition of the role of emergency medical services in improving population health. Emergency medical services remain underdeveloped in many low income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. There have been no previous evaluations of specialist emergency and critical care services in Sierra Leone. METHODS: Emergency care capacity was evaluated at a sample of seven public and private hospitals in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone. A structured set of minimum standards necessary to deliver emergency and critical care in the low-income setting was used to evaluate capacity. The key dimensions of capacity evaluated were infrastructure, human resources, drug and equipment availability, training, systems, guidelines and diagnostics. A score for each dimension of capacity was calculated based on the availability of a list of specified indicators within each dimension. In addition, an Emergency Care Capacity Score was calculated to demonstrate a composite measure of capacity based on the various indicator scores. This method has been used by the World Health Organisation in evaluating the availability and readiness of healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. RESULTS: Substantial deficiencies in capacity were demonstrated across the range of indicators and predominantly affecting publically funded facilities. Capacity was weakest in the domain of infrastructure, with an average score of 43%, while the strongest areas of capacity overall were in drug availability, 82%, and human resources, 79%. A marked disparity was noted between public and private healthcare facilities with consistently lower capacity in the former. The overall Emergency Care Capacity Score was 66%. CONCLUSION: There are substantial deficiencies in emergency care systems in public hospitals in Freetown which are likely to compromise effective care. This represents a serious barrier to access to emergency healthcare. Emergency care systems have an important role in improving population health and as such should a priority for local policy makers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43204662015-02-08 Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation Coyle, Rachel M Harrison, Hooi-Ling BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an increasing global recognition of the role of emergency medical services in improving population health. Emergency medical services remain underdeveloped in many low income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. There have been no previous evaluations of specialist emergency and critical care services in Sierra Leone. METHODS: Emergency care capacity was evaluated at a sample of seven public and private hospitals in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone. A structured set of minimum standards necessary to deliver emergency and critical care in the low-income setting was used to evaluate capacity. The key dimensions of capacity evaluated were infrastructure, human resources, drug and equipment availability, training, systems, guidelines and diagnostics. A score for each dimension of capacity was calculated based on the availability of a list of specified indicators within each dimension. In addition, an Emergency Care Capacity Score was calculated to demonstrate a composite measure of capacity based on the various indicator scores. This method has been used by the World Health Organisation in evaluating the availability and readiness of healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. RESULTS: Substantial deficiencies in capacity were demonstrated across the range of indicators and predominantly affecting publically funded facilities. Capacity was weakest in the domain of infrastructure, with an average score of 43%, while the strongest areas of capacity overall were in drug availability, 82%, and human resources, 79%. A marked disparity was noted between public and private healthcare facilities with consistently lower capacity in the former. The overall Emergency Care Capacity Score was 66%. CONCLUSION: There are substantial deficiencies in emergency care systems in public hospitals in Freetown which are likely to compromise effective care. This represents a serious barrier to access to emergency healthcare. Emergency care systems have an important role in improving population health and as such should a priority for local policy makers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4320466/ /pubmed/25644792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4 Text en © Coyle and Harrison.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coyle, Rachel M
Harrison, Hooi-Ling
Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title_full Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title_fullStr Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title_short Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation
title_sort emergency care capacity in freetown, sierra leone: a service evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4
work_keys_str_mv AT coylerachelm emergencycarecapacityinfreetownsierraleoneaserviceevaluation
AT harrisonhooiling emergencycarecapacityinfreetownsierraleoneaserviceevaluation