Cargando…

Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction

BACKGROUND: Differences in linkage disequilibrium and in allele substitution effects of QTL (quantitative trait loci) may hinder genomic prediction across populations. Our objective was to develop a deterministic formula to estimate the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction, for which ref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wientjes, Yvonne CJ, Veerkamp, Roel F, Bijma, Piter, Bovenhuis, Henk, Schrooten, Chris, Calus, Mario PL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0
_version_ 1782356121043861504
author Wientjes, Yvonne CJ
Veerkamp, Roel F
Bijma, Piter
Bovenhuis, Henk
Schrooten, Chris
Calus, Mario PL
author_facet Wientjes, Yvonne CJ
Veerkamp, Roel F
Bijma, Piter
Bovenhuis, Henk
Schrooten, Chris
Calus, Mario PL
author_sort Wientjes, Yvonne CJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Differences in linkage disequilibrium and in allele substitution effects of QTL (quantitative trait loci) may hinder genomic prediction across populations. Our objective was to develop a deterministic formula to estimate the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction, for which reference individuals and selection candidates are from different populations, and to investigate the impact of differences in allele substitution effects across populations and of the number of QTL underlying a trait on the accuracy. METHODS: A deterministic formula to estimate the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction was derived based on selection index theory. Moreover, accuracies were deterministically predicted using a formula based on population parameters and empirically calculated using simulated phenotypes and a GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) model. Phenotypes of 1033 Holstein-Friesian, 105 Groninger White Headed and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were simulated by sampling 3000, 300, 30 or 3 QTL from the available high-density SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) information of three chromosomes, assuming a correlation of 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, or 0.2 between allele substitution effects across breeds. The simulated heritability was set to 0.95 to resemble the heritability of deregressed proofs of bulls. RESULTS: Accuracies estimated with the deterministic formula based on selection index theory were similar to empirical accuracies for all scenarios, while accuracies predicted with the formula based on population parameters overestimated empirical accuracies by ~25 to 30%. When the between-breed genetic correlation differed from 1, i.e. allele substitution effects differed across breeds, empirical and deterministic accuracies decreased in proportion to the genetic correlation. Using a multi-trait model, it was possible to accurately estimate the genetic correlation between the breeds based on phenotypes and high-density genotypes. The number of QTL underlying the simulated trait did not affect the accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The deterministic formula based on selection index theory estimated the accuracy of across-population genomic predictions well. The deterministic formula using population parameters overestimated the across-population genomic accuracy, but may still be useful because of its simplicity. Both formulas could accommodate for genetic correlations between populations lower than 1. The number of QTL underlying a trait did not affect the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction using a GBLUP method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43204722015-02-08 Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction Wientjes, Yvonne CJ Veerkamp, Roel F Bijma, Piter Bovenhuis, Henk Schrooten, Chris Calus, Mario PL Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Differences in linkage disequilibrium and in allele substitution effects of QTL (quantitative trait loci) may hinder genomic prediction across populations. Our objective was to develop a deterministic formula to estimate the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction, for which reference individuals and selection candidates are from different populations, and to investigate the impact of differences in allele substitution effects across populations and of the number of QTL underlying a trait on the accuracy. METHODS: A deterministic formula to estimate the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction was derived based on selection index theory. Moreover, accuracies were deterministically predicted using a formula based on population parameters and empirically calculated using simulated phenotypes and a GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) model. Phenotypes of 1033 Holstein-Friesian, 105 Groninger White Headed and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were simulated by sampling 3000, 300, 30 or 3 QTL from the available high-density SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) information of three chromosomes, assuming a correlation of 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, or 0.2 between allele substitution effects across breeds. The simulated heritability was set to 0.95 to resemble the heritability of deregressed proofs of bulls. RESULTS: Accuracies estimated with the deterministic formula based on selection index theory were similar to empirical accuracies for all scenarios, while accuracies predicted with the formula based on population parameters overestimated empirical accuracies by ~25 to 30%. When the between-breed genetic correlation differed from 1, i.e. allele substitution effects differed across breeds, empirical and deterministic accuracies decreased in proportion to the genetic correlation. Using a multi-trait model, it was possible to accurately estimate the genetic correlation between the breeds based on phenotypes and high-density genotypes. The number of QTL underlying the simulated trait did not affect the accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The deterministic formula based on selection index theory estimated the accuracy of across-population genomic predictions well. The deterministic formula using population parameters overestimated the across-population genomic accuracy, but may still be useful because of its simplicity. Both formulas could accommodate for genetic correlations between populations lower than 1. The number of QTL underlying a trait did not affect the accuracy of across-population genomic prediction using a GBLUP method. BioMed Central 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4320472/ /pubmed/25885467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0 Text en © Wientjes et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wientjes, Yvonne CJ
Veerkamp, Roel F
Bijma, Piter
Bovenhuis, Henk
Schrooten, Chris
Calus, Mario PL
Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title_full Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title_fullStr Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title_full_unstemmed Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title_short Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
title_sort empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wientjesyvonnecj empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction
AT veerkamproelf empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction
AT bijmapiter empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction
AT bovenhuishenk empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction
AT schrootenchris empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction
AT calusmariopl empiricalanddeterministicaccuraciesofacrosspopulationgenomicprediction