Cargando…
Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications
BACKGROUND: Outcome reporting bias has received widespread recognition and been considered to pose two threats to the validity of clinical decision making because they overestimate the effect of treatments or distort the results of trials. However, the problem of outcome-reporting bias has not been...
Autores principales: | Su, Chun-Xiang, Han, Mei, Ren, Jun, Li, Wen-Yuan, Yue, Shu-Jin, Hao, Yu-Fang, Liu, Jian-Ping |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25626862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-014-0545-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence
por: Ayorinde, Abimbola A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation
por: Urai, Anne E, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Does Offering Battlefield Acupuncture Lead to Subsequent Use of Traditional Acupuncture?
por: Thomas, Eva R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)