Cargando…
Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa
BACKGROUND: ‘Dual practice’, or multiple job holding, generally involves public sector-based health workers taking additional work in the private sector. This form of the practice is purported to help retain public health care workers in low and middle-income countries’ public sectors through additi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-3 |
_version_ | 1782356142816493568 |
---|---|
author | Ashmore, John Gilson, Lucy |
author_facet | Ashmore, John Gilson, Lucy |
author_sort | Ashmore, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ‘Dual practice’, or multiple job holding, generally involves public sector-based health workers taking additional work in the private sector. This form of the practice is purported to help retain public health care workers in low and middle-income countries’ public sectors through additional wage incentives. There has been little conceptual or empirical development of the relationship between dual practice and retention. METHODS: This article helps begin to fill this gap, drawing on empirical evidence from a qualitative study focusing on South African specialists. Fifty-one repeat, in-depth interviews were carried out with 28 doctors (predominantly specialists) with more than one job, in one public and one private urban hospital. RESULTS: Findings suggest dual practice can impact both positively and negatively on specialists’ intention to stay in the public sector. This is through multiple conceptual channels including those previously identified in the literature such as dual practice acting as a ‘stepping stone’ to private practice by reducing migration costs. Dual practice can also lead specialists to re-evaluate how they compare public and private jobs, and to overworking which can expedite decisions on whether to stay in the public sector or leave. Numerous respondents undertook dual practice without official permission. CONCLUSIONS: The idea that dual practice helps retain public specialists in South Africa may be overstated. Yet banning the practice may be ineffective, given many undertake it without permission in any case. Regulation should be better enforced to ensure dual practice is not abused. The conceptual framework developed in this article could form a basis for further qualitative and quantitative inquiry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-13-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4320565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43205652015-02-08 Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa Ashmore, John Gilson, Lucy Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: ‘Dual practice’, or multiple job holding, generally involves public sector-based health workers taking additional work in the private sector. This form of the practice is purported to help retain public health care workers in low and middle-income countries’ public sectors through additional wage incentives. There has been little conceptual or empirical development of the relationship between dual practice and retention. METHODS: This article helps begin to fill this gap, drawing on empirical evidence from a qualitative study focusing on South African specialists. Fifty-one repeat, in-depth interviews were carried out with 28 doctors (predominantly specialists) with more than one job, in one public and one private urban hospital. RESULTS: Findings suggest dual practice can impact both positively and negatively on specialists’ intention to stay in the public sector. This is through multiple conceptual channels including those previously identified in the literature such as dual practice acting as a ‘stepping stone’ to private practice by reducing migration costs. Dual practice can also lead specialists to re-evaluate how they compare public and private jobs, and to overworking which can expedite decisions on whether to stay in the public sector or leave. Numerous respondents undertook dual practice without official permission. CONCLUSIONS: The idea that dual practice helps retain public specialists in South Africa may be overstated. Yet banning the practice may be ineffective, given many undertake it without permission in any case. Regulation should be better enforced to ensure dual practice is not abused. The conceptual framework developed in this article could form a basis for further qualitative and quantitative inquiry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-13-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4320565/ /pubmed/25600159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-3 Text en © Ashmore and Gilson; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ashmore, John Gilson, Lucy Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title | Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title_full | Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title_fullStr | Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title_short | Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from South Africa |
title_sort | conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists - evidence from south africa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashmorejohn conceptualizingtheimpactsofdualpracticeontheretentionofpublicsectorspecialistsevidencefromsouthafrica AT gilsonlucy conceptualizingtheimpactsofdualpracticeontheretentionofpublicsectorspecialistsevidencefromsouthafrica |