Cargando…
Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module
BACKGROUND: A major problem arising from searching across bibliographic databases is the retrieval of duplicate citations. Removing such duplicates is an essential task to ensure systematic reviewers do not waste time screening the same citation multiple times. Although reference management software...
Autores principales: | Rathbone, John, Carter, Matt, Hoffmann, Tammy, Glasziou, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25588387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension
por: Rathbone, John, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers
por: Rathbone, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews
por: Hair, Kaitlyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured
por: Albarqouni, Loai, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Trends in cleaning relational data: consistency and deduplication
por: Ilyas, Ihab F, et al.
Publicado: (2015)