Cargando…
Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the fir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8 |
_version_ | 1782356162364047360 |
---|---|
author | Nattinger, Ann Butler Pezzin, Liliana E McGinley, Emily L Charlson, John A Yen, Tina W F Neuner, Joan M |
author_facet | Nattinger, Ann Butler Pezzin, Liliana E McGinley, Emily L Charlson, John A Yen, Tina W F Neuner, Joan M |
author_sort | Nattinger, Ann Butler |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. METHODS: The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006–2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. CONCLUSIONS: The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4320689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43206892015-02-11 Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations Nattinger, Ann Butler Pezzin, Liliana E McGinley, Emily L Charlson, John A Yen, Tina W F Neuner, Joan M Springerplus Research PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. METHODS: The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006–2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. CONCLUSIONS: The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so. Springer International Publishing 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4320689/ /pubmed/25674506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8 Text en © Nattinger et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Nattinger, Ann Butler Pezzin, Liliana E McGinley, Emily L Charlson, John A Yen, Tina W F Neuner, Joan M Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title | Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title_full | Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title_fullStr | Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title_short | Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations |
title_sort | patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under medicare part d vs with generic formulations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nattingerannbutler patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations AT pezzinlilianae patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations AT mcginleyemilyl patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations AT charlsonjohna patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations AT yentinawf patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations AT neunerjoanm patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations |