Cargando…

Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations

PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nattinger, Ann Butler, Pezzin, Liliana E, McGinley, Emily L, Charlson, John A, Yen, Tina W F, Neuner, Joan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8
_version_ 1782356162364047360
author Nattinger, Ann Butler
Pezzin, Liliana E
McGinley, Emily L
Charlson, John A
Yen, Tina W F
Neuner, Joan M
author_facet Nattinger, Ann Butler
Pezzin, Liliana E
McGinley, Emily L
Charlson, John A
Yen, Tina W F
Neuner, Joan M
author_sort Nattinger, Ann Butler
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. METHODS: The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006–2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. CONCLUSIONS: The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4320689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43206892015-02-11 Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations Nattinger, Ann Butler Pezzin, Liliana E McGinley, Emily L Charlson, John A Yen, Tina W F Neuner, Joan M Springerplus Research PURPOSE: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. METHODS: The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006–2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. CONCLUSIONS: The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so. Springer International Publishing 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4320689/ /pubmed/25674506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8 Text en © Nattinger et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Nattinger, Ann Butler
Pezzin, Liliana E
McGinley, Emily L
Charlson, John A
Yen, Tina W F
Neuner, Joan M
Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title_full Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title_fullStr Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title_full_unstemmed Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title_short Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
title_sort patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under medicare part d vs with generic formulations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nattingerannbutler patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations
AT pezzinlilianae patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations
AT mcginleyemilyl patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations
AT charlsonjohna patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations
AT yentinawf patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations
AT neunerjoanm patientcostsofbreastcancerendocrinetherapyagentsundermedicarepartdvswithgenericformulations