Cargando…

Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting

PURPOSE: Measuring and developing a safe culture in health care is a focus point in creating highly reliable organizations being successful in avoiding patient safety incidents where these could normally be expected. Questionnaires can be used to capture a snapshot of an employee’s perceptions of pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristensen, Solvejg, Sabroe, Svend, Bartels, Paul, Mainz, Jan, Christensen, Karl Bang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674015
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S75560
_version_ 1782356268846940160
author Kristensen, Solvejg
Sabroe, Svend
Bartels, Paul
Mainz, Jan
Christensen, Karl Bang
author_facet Kristensen, Solvejg
Sabroe, Svend
Bartels, Paul
Mainz, Jan
Christensen, Karl Bang
author_sort Kristensen, Solvejg
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Measuring and developing a safe culture in health care is a focus point in creating highly reliable organizations being successful in avoiding patient safety incidents where these could normally be expected. Questionnaires can be used to capture a snapshot of an employee’s perceptions of patient safety culture. A commonly used instrument to measure safety climate is the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). The purpose of this study was to adapt the SAQ for use in Danish hospitals, assess its construct validity and reliability, and present benchmark data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SAQ was translated and adapted for the Danish setting (SAQ-DK). The SAQ-DK was distributed to 1,263 staff members from 31 in- and outpatient units (clinical areas) across five somatic and one psychiatric hospitals through meeting administration, hand delivery, and mailing. Construct validity and reliability were tested in a cross-sectional study. Goodness-of-fit indices from confirmatory factor analysis were reported along with inter-item correlations, Cronbach’s alpha (α), and item and subscale scores. RESULTS: Participation was 73.2% (N=925) of invited health care workers. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: c(2)=1496.76, P<0.001, CFI 0.901, RMSEA (90% CI) 0.053 (0.050–0056), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.057. Inter-scale correlations between the factors showed moderate-to-high correlations. The scale stress recognition had significant negative correlations with each of the other scales. Questionnaire reliability was high, (α=0.89), and scale reliability ranged from α=0.70 to α=0.86 for the six scales. Proportions of participants with a positive attitude to each of the six SAQ scales did not differ between the somatic and psychiatric health care staff. Substantial variability at the unit level in all six scale mean scores was found within the somatic and the psychiatric samples. CONCLUSION: SAQ-DK showed good construct validity and internal consistency reliability. SAQ-DK is potentially a useful tool for evaluating perceptions of patient safety culture in Danish hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4321416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43214162015-02-11 Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting Kristensen, Solvejg Sabroe, Svend Bartels, Paul Mainz, Jan Christensen, Karl Bang Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: Measuring and developing a safe culture in health care is a focus point in creating highly reliable organizations being successful in avoiding patient safety incidents where these could normally be expected. Questionnaires can be used to capture a snapshot of an employee’s perceptions of patient safety culture. A commonly used instrument to measure safety climate is the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). The purpose of this study was to adapt the SAQ for use in Danish hospitals, assess its construct validity and reliability, and present benchmark data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SAQ was translated and adapted for the Danish setting (SAQ-DK). The SAQ-DK was distributed to 1,263 staff members from 31 in- and outpatient units (clinical areas) across five somatic and one psychiatric hospitals through meeting administration, hand delivery, and mailing. Construct validity and reliability were tested in a cross-sectional study. Goodness-of-fit indices from confirmatory factor analysis were reported along with inter-item correlations, Cronbach’s alpha (α), and item and subscale scores. RESULTS: Participation was 73.2% (N=925) of invited health care workers. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: c(2)=1496.76, P<0.001, CFI 0.901, RMSEA (90% CI) 0.053 (0.050–0056), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.057. Inter-scale correlations between the factors showed moderate-to-high correlations. The scale stress recognition had significant negative correlations with each of the other scales. Questionnaire reliability was high, (α=0.89), and scale reliability ranged from α=0.70 to α=0.86 for the six scales. Proportions of participants with a positive attitude to each of the six SAQ scales did not differ between the somatic and psychiatric health care staff. Substantial variability at the unit level in all six scale mean scores was found within the somatic and the psychiatric samples. CONCLUSION: SAQ-DK showed good construct validity and internal consistency reliability. SAQ-DK is potentially a useful tool for evaluating perceptions of patient safety culture in Danish hospitals. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4321416/ /pubmed/25674015 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S75560 Text en © 2015 Kristensen et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kristensen, Solvejg
Sabroe, Svend
Bartels, Paul
Mainz, Jan
Christensen, Karl Bang
Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title_full Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title_fullStr Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title_full_unstemmed Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title_short Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting
title_sort adaption and validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire for the danish hospital setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674015
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S75560
work_keys_str_mv AT kristensensolvejg adaptionandvalidationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforthedanishhospitalsetting
AT sabroesvend adaptionandvalidationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforthedanishhospitalsetting
AT bartelspaul adaptionandvalidationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforthedanishhospitalsetting
AT mainzjan adaptionandvalidationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforthedanishhospitalsetting
AT christensenkarlbang adaptionandvalidationofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireforthedanishhospitalsetting