Cargando…
Auditory working memory for objects vs. features
This work considers bases for working memory for non-verbal sounds. Specifically we address whether sounds are represented as integrated objects or individual features in auditory working memory and whether the representational format influences WM capacity. The experiments used sounds in which two...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013 |
_version_ | 1782356281116327936 |
---|---|
author | Joseph, Sabine Kumar, Sukhbinder Husain, Masud Griffiths, Timothy D. |
author_facet | Joseph, Sabine Kumar, Sukhbinder Husain, Masud Griffiths, Timothy D. |
author_sort | Joseph, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work considers bases for working memory for non-verbal sounds. Specifically we address whether sounds are represented as integrated objects or individual features in auditory working memory and whether the representational format influences WM capacity. The experiments used sounds in which two different stimulus features, spectral passband and temporal amplitude modulation rate, could be combined to produce different auditory objects. Participants had to memorize sequences of auditory objects of variable length (1–4 items). They either maintained sequences of whole objects or sequences of individual features until recall for one of the items was tested. Memory recall was more accurate when the objects had to be maintained as a whole compared to the individual features alone. This is due to interference between features of the same object. Additionally a feature extraction cost was associated with maintenance and recall of individual features, when extracted from bound object representations. An interpretation of our findings is that, at some stage of processing, sounds might be stored as objects in WM with features bound into coherent wholes. The results have implications for feature-integration theory in the context of WM in the auditory system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4321563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43215632015-02-23 Auditory working memory for objects vs. features Joseph, Sabine Kumar, Sukhbinder Husain, Masud Griffiths, Timothy D. Front Neurosci Psychology This work considers bases for working memory for non-verbal sounds. Specifically we address whether sounds are represented as integrated objects or individual features in auditory working memory and whether the representational format influences WM capacity. The experiments used sounds in which two different stimulus features, spectral passband and temporal amplitude modulation rate, could be combined to produce different auditory objects. Participants had to memorize sequences of auditory objects of variable length (1–4 items). They either maintained sequences of whole objects or sequences of individual features until recall for one of the items was tested. Memory recall was more accurate when the objects had to be maintained as a whole compared to the individual features alone. This is due to interference between features of the same object. Additionally a feature extraction cost was associated with maintenance and recall of individual features, when extracted from bound object representations. An interpretation of our findings is that, at some stage of processing, sounds might be stored as objects in WM with features bound into coherent wholes. The results have implications for feature-integration theory in the context of WM in the auditory system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4321563/ /pubmed/25709563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013 Text en Copyright © 2015 Joseph, Kumar, Husain and Griffiths. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Joseph, Sabine Kumar, Sukhbinder Husain, Masud Griffiths, Timothy D. Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title | Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title_full | Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title_fullStr | Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title_full_unstemmed | Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title_short | Auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
title_sort | auditory working memory for objects vs. features |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephsabine auditoryworkingmemoryforobjectsvsfeatures AT kumarsukhbinder auditoryworkingmemoryforobjectsvsfeatures AT husainmasud auditoryworkingmemoryforobjectsvsfeatures AT griffithstimothyd auditoryworkingmemoryforobjectsvsfeatures |