Cargando…

Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method

Campylobacter is the leading agent of diarrheal disease worldwide. This study evaluates a novel culture-PCR hybrid (MPN-PCR) assay for the rapid enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from estuarine and wastewater systems. To first evaluate the current, culture-based, Australian standard, an inter-labora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Rebekah, Schang, Christelle, Chandrasena, Gayani I., Deletic, Ana, Edmunds, Mark, Jovanovic, Dusan, Kolotelo, Peter, Schmidt, Jonathan, Williamson, Richard, McCarthy, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00074
_version_ 1782356284510568448
author Henry, Rebekah
Schang, Christelle
Chandrasena, Gayani I.
Deletic, Ana
Edmunds, Mark
Jovanovic, Dusan
Kolotelo, Peter
Schmidt, Jonathan
Williamson, Richard
McCarthy, David
author_facet Henry, Rebekah
Schang, Christelle
Chandrasena, Gayani I.
Deletic, Ana
Edmunds, Mark
Jovanovic, Dusan
Kolotelo, Peter
Schmidt, Jonathan
Williamson, Richard
McCarthy, David
author_sort Henry, Rebekah
collection PubMed
description Campylobacter is the leading agent of diarrheal disease worldwide. This study evaluates a novel culture-PCR hybrid (MPN-PCR) assay for the rapid enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from estuarine and wastewater systems. To first evaluate the current, culture-based, Australian standard, an inter-laboratory study was conducted on 69 subsampled water samples. The proposed Most-Probable Number (MPN)-PCR method was then evaluated, by analysing 147 estuarine samples collected over a 2 year period. Data for 14 different biological, hydrological and climatic parameters were also collated to identify pathogen-environment relationships and assess the potential for method specific bias. The results demonstrated that the intra-laboratory performance of the MPN-PCR was superior to that of AS/NZS (σ = 0.7912, P < 0.001; κ = 0.701, P < 0.001) with an overall diagnostic accuracy of ~94%. Furthermore, the analysis of both MPN-PCR and AS/NZS identified the potential for the introduction of method specific bias during assessment of the effects of environmental parameters on Campylobacter spp. numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4321596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43215962015-02-23 Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method Henry, Rebekah Schang, Christelle Chandrasena, Gayani I. Deletic, Ana Edmunds, Mark Jovanovic, Dusan Kolotelo, Peter Schmidt, Jonathan Williamson, Richard McCarthy, David Front Microbiol Microbiology Campylobacter is the leading agent of diarrheal disease worldwide. This study evaluates a novel culture-PCR hybrid (MPN-PCR) assay for the rapid enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from estuarine and wastewater systems. To first evaluate the current, culture-based, Australian standard, an inter-laboratory study was conducted on 69 subsampled water samples. The proposed Most-Probable Number (MPN)-PCR method was then evaluated, by analysing 147 estuarine samples collected over a 2 year period. Data for 14 different biological, hydrological and climatic parameters were also collated to identify pathogen-environment relationships and assess the potential for method specific bias. The results demonstrated that the intra-laboratory performance of the MPN-PCR was superior to that of AS/NZS (σ = 0.7912, P < 0.001; κ = 0.701, P < 0.001) with an overall diagnostic accuracy of ~94%. Furthermore, the analysis of both MPN-PCR and AS/NZS identified the potential for the introduction of method specific bias during assessment of the effects of environmental parameters on Campylobacter spp. numbers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4321596/ /pubmed/25709604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00074 Text en Copyright © 2015 Henry, Schang, Chandrasena, Deletic, Edmunds, Jovanovic, Kolotelo, Schmidt, Williamson and McCarthy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Henry, Rebekah
Schang, Christelle
Chandrasena, Gayani I.
Deletic, Ana
Edmunds, Mark
Jovanovic, Dusan
Kolotelo, Peter
Schmidt, Jonathan
Williamson, Richard
McCarthy, David
Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title_full Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title_fullStr Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title_full_unstemmed Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title_short Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method
title_sort environmental monitoring of waterborne campylobacter: evaluation of the australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free mpn-pcr method
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4321596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT henryrebekah environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT schangchristelle environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT chandrasenagayanii environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT deleticana environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT edmundsmark environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT jovanovicdusan environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT kolotelopeter environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT schmidtjonathan environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT williamsonrichard environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod
AT mccarthydavid environmentalmonitoringofwaterbornecampylobacterevaluationoftheaustralianstandardandahybridextractionfreempnpcrmethod