Cargando…

Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonati, Leo H, Dobson, Joanna, Featherstone, Roland L, Ederle, Jörg, van der Worp, H Bart, de Borst, Gert J, Mali, Willem P Th M, Beard, Jonathan D, Cleveland, Trevor, Engelter, Stefan T, Lyrer, Philippe A, Ford, Gary A, Dorman, Paul J, Brown, Martin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3
_version_ 1782356340845314048
author Bonati, Leo H
Dobson, Joanna
Featherstone, Roland L
Ederle, Jörg
van der Worp, H Bart
de Borst, Gert J
Mali, Willem P Th M
Beard, Jonathan D
Cleveland, Trevor
Engelter, Stefan T
Lyrer, Philippe A
Ford, Gary A
Dorman, Paul J
Brown, Martin M
author_facet Bonati, Leo H
Dobson, Joanna
Featherstone, Roland L
Ederle, Jörg
van der Worp, H Bart
de Borst, Gert J
Mali, Willem P Th M
Beard, Jonathan D
Cleveland, Trevor
Engelter, Stefan T
Lyrer, Philippe A
Ford, Gary A
Dorman, Paul J
Brown, Martin M
author_sort Bonati, Leo H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly assigned 1:1 to open treatment with stenting or endarterectomy at 50 centres worldwide. Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone call or fax. Major outcomes were assessed by an independent endpoint committee unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was fatal or disabling stroke in any territory after randomisation to the end of follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat ([ITT] all patients) and per protocol from 31 days after treatment (all patients in whom assigned treatment was completed). Functional ability was rated with the modified Rankin scale. This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470. FINDINGS: 1713 patients were assigned to stenting (n=855) or endarterectomy (n=858) and followed up for a median of 4·2 years (IQR 3·0–5·2, maximum 10·0). Three patients withdrew immediately and, therefore, the ITT population comprised 1710 patients. The number of fatal or disabling strokes (52 vs 49) and cumulative 5-year risk did not differ significantly between the stenting and endarterectomy groups (6·4% vs 6·5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·72–1·57, p=0·77). Any stroke was more frequent in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (119 vs 72 events; ITT population, 5-year cumulative risk 15·2% vs 9·4%, HR 1·71, 95% CI 1·28–2·30, p<0·001; per-protocol population, 5-year cumulative risk 8·9% vs 5·8%, 1·53, 1·02–2·31, p=0·04), but were mainly non-disabling strokes. The distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 1 year, 5 years, or final follow-up did not differ significantly between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: Long-term functional outcome and risk of fatal or disabling stroke are similar for stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lancet Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43221882015-02-14 Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial Bonati, Leo H Dobson, Joanna Featherstone, Roland L Ederle, Jörg van der Worp, H Bart de Borst, Gert J Mali, Willem P Th M Beard, Jonathan D Cleveland, Trevor Engelter, Stefan T Lyrer, Philippe A Ford, Gary A Dorman, Paul J Brown, Martin M Lancet Articles BACKGROUND: Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly assigned 1:1 to open treatment with stenting or endarterectomy at 50 centres worldwide. Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone call or fax. Major outcomes were assessed by an independent endpoint committee unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was fatal or disabling stroke in any territory after randomisation to the end of follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat ([ITT] all patients) and per protocol from 31 days after treatment (all patients in whom assigned treatment was completed). Functional ability was rated with the modified Rankin scale. This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470. FINDINGS: 1713 patients were assigned to stenting (n=855) or endarterectomy (n=858) and followed up for a median of 4·2 years (IQR 3·0–5·2, maximum 10·0). Three patients withdrew immediately and, therefore, the ITT population comprised 1710 patients. The number of fatal or disabling strokes (52 vs 49) and cumulative 5-year risk did not differ significantly between the stenting and endarterectomy groups (6·4% vs 6·5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·72–1·57, p=0·77). Any stroke was more frequent in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (119 vs 72 events; ITT population, 5-year cumulative risk 15·2% vs 9·4%, HR 1·71, 95% CI 1·28–2·30, p<0·001; per-protocol population, 5-year cumulative risk 8·9% vs 5·8%, 1·53, 1·02–2·31, p=0·04), but were mainly non-disabling strokes. The distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 1 year, 5 years, or final follow-up did not differ significantly between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: Long-term functional outcome and risk of fatal or disabling stroke are similar for stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union. Lancet Publishing Group 2015-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4322188/ /pubmed/25453443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3 Text en © 2015 Bonati et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) .
spellingShingle Articles
Bonati, Leo H
Dobson, Joanna
Featherstone, Roland L
Ederle, Jörg
van der Worp, H Bart
de Borst, Gert J
Mali, Willem P Th M
Beard, Jonathan D
Cleveland, Trevor
Engelter, Stefan T
Lyrer, Philippe A
Ford, Gary A
Dorman, Paul J
Brown, Martin M
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title_full Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title_short Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial
title_sort long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the international carotid stenting study (icss) randomised trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bonatileoh longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT dobsonjoanna longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT featherstonerolandl longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT ederlejorg longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT vanderworphbart longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT deborstgertj longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT maliwillempthm longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT beardjonathand longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT clevelandtrevor longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT engelterstefant longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT lyrerphilippea longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT fordgarya longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT dormanpaulj longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT brownmartinm longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial
AT longtermoutcomesafterstentingversusendarterectomyfortreatmentofsymptomaticcarotidstenosistheinternationalcarotidstentingstudyicssrandomisedtrial