Cargando…

Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)

INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rickard, Claire M, Marsh, Nicole M, Webster, Joan, Gavin, Nicole C, McGrail, Matthew R, Larsen, Emily, Corley, Amanda, Long, Debbie, Gowardman, John R, Murgo, Marghie, Fraser, John F, Chan, Raymond J, Wallis, Marianne C, Young, Jeanine, McMillan, David, Zhang, Li, Choudhury, Md Abu, Graves, Nicholas, Playford, E Geoffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257
_version_ 1782356341758623744
author Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole M
Webster, Joan
Gavin, Nicole C
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Corley, Amanda
Long, Debbie
Gowardman, John R
Murgo, Marghie
Fraser, John F
Chan, Raymond J
Wallis, Marianne C
Young, Jeanine
McMillan, David
Zhang, Li
Choudhury, Md Abu
Graves, Nicholas
Playford, E Geoffrey
author_facet Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole M
Webster, Joan
Gavin, Nicole C
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Corley, Amanda
Long, Debbie
Gowardman, John R
Murgo, Marghie
Fraser, John F
Chan, Raymond J
Wallis, Marianne C
Young, Jeanine
McMillan, David
Zhang, Li
Choudhury, Md Abu
Graves, Nicholas
Playford, E Geoffrey
author_sort Rickard, Claire M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-monitoring transducers and/or burettes. While VADs are replaced only when necessary, AS are routinely replaced every 3–4 days in the belief that this reduces infectious complications. Strong evidence supports AS use up to 4 days, but there is less evidence for AS use beyond 4 days. AS replacement twice weekly increases hospital costs and workload. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of equivalence design comparing AS replacement at 4 (control) versus 7 (experimental) days. Randomisation is stratified by site and device, centrally allocated and concealed until enrolment. 6554 adult/paediatric patients with a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter or peripheral arterial catheter will be enrolled over 4 years. The primary outcome is VAD-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and secondary outcomes are VAD colonisation, AS colonisation, all-cause BSI, all-cause mortality, number of AS per patient, VAD time in situ and costs. Relative incidence rates of VAD-BSI per 100 devices and hazard rates per 1000 device days (95% CIs) will summarise the impact of 7-day relative to 4-day AS use and test equivalence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare VAD-BSI over time. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques will be used to compare secondary end points. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical approvals have been received. CONSORT Statement recommendations will be used to guide preparation of any publication. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and sent to the major organisations with clinical practice guidelines for VAD care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12610000505000).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43221942015-02-13 Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole M Webster, Joan Gavin, Nicole C McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Corley, Amanda Long, Debbie Gowardman, John R Murgo, Marghie Fraser, John F Chan, Raymond J Wallis, Marianne C Young, Jeanine McMillan, David Zhang, Li Choudhury, Md Abu Graves, Nicholas Playford, E Geoffrey BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-monitoring transducers and/or burettes. While VADs are replaced only when necessary, AS are routinely replaced every 3–4 days in the belief that this reduces infectious complications. Strong evidence supports AS use up to 4 days, but there is less evidence for AS use beyond 4 days. AS replacement twice weekly increases hospital costs and workload. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of equivalence design comparing AS replacement at 4 (control) versus 7 (experimental) days. Randomisation is stratified by site and device, centrally allocated and concealed until enrolment. 6554 adult/paediatric patients with a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter or peripheral arterial catheter will be enrolled over 4 years. The primary outcome is VAD-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and secondary outcomes are VAD colonisation, AS colonisation, all-cause BSI, all-cause mortality, number of AS per patient, VAD time in situ and costs. Relative incidence rates of VAD-BSI per 100 devices and hazard rates per 1000 device days (95% CIs) will summarise the impact of 7-day relative to 4-day AS use and test equivalence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare VAD-BSI over time. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques will be used to compare secondary end points. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical approvals have been received. CONSORT Statement recommendations will be used to guide preparation of any publication. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and sent to the major organisations with clinical practice guidelines for VAD care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12610000505000). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4322194/ /pubmed/25649214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole M
Webster, Joan
Gavin, Nicole C
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Corley, Amanda
Long, Debbie
Gowardman, John R
Murgo, Marghie
Fraser, John F
Chan, Raymond J
Wallis, Marianne C
Young, Jeanine
McMillan, David
Zhang, Li
Choudhury, Md Abu
Graves, Nicholas
Playford, E Geoffrey
Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title_full Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title_fullStr Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title_full_unstemmed Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title_short Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
title_sort intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the rsvp trial)
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257
work_keys_str_mv AT rickardclairem intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT marshnicolem intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT websterjoan intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT gavinnicolec intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT mcgrailmatthewr intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT larsenemily intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT corleyamanda intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT longdebbie intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT gowardmanjohnr intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT murgomarghie intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT fraserjohnf intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT chanraymondj intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT wallismariannec intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT youngjeanine intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT mcmillandavid intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT zhangli intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT choudhurymdabu intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT gravesnicholas intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial
AT playfordegeoffrey intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial