Cargando…
Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial)
INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257 |
_version_ | 1782356341758623744 |
---|---|
author | Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole M Webster, Joan Gavin, Nicole C McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Corley, Amanda Long, Debbie Gowardman, John R Murgo, Marghie Fraser, John F Chan, Raymond J Wallis, Marianne C Young, Jeanine McMillan, David Zhang, Li Choudhury, Md Abu Graves, Nicholas Playford, E Geoffrey |
author_facet | Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole M Webster, Joan Gavin, Nicole C McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Corley, Amanda Long, Debbie Gowardman, John R Murgo, Marghie Fraser, John F Chan, Raymond J Wallis, Marianne C Young, Jeanine McMillan, David Zhang, Li Choudhury, Md Abu Graves, Nicholas Playford, E Geoffrey |
author_sort | Rickard, Claire M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-monitoring transducers and/or burettes. While VADs are replaced only when necessary, AS are routinely replaced every 3–4 days in the belief that this reduces infectious complications. Strong evidence supports AS use up to 4 days, but there is less evidence for AS use beyond 4 days. AS replacement twice weekly increases hospital costs and workload. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of equivalence design comparing AS replacement at 4 (control) versus 7 (experimental) days. Randomisation is stratified by site and device, centrally allocated and concealed until enrolment. 6554 adult/paediatric patients with a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter or peripheral arterial catheter will be enrolled over 4 years. The primary outcome is VAD-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and secondary outcomes are VAD colonisation, AS colonisation, all-cause BSI, all-cause mortality, number of AS per patient, VAD time in situ and costs. Relative incidence rates of VAD-BSI per 100 devices and hazard rates per 1000 device days (95% CIs) will summarise the impact of 7-day relative to 4-day AS use and test equivalence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare VAD-BSI over time. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques will be used to compare secondary end points. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical approvals have been received. CONSORT Statement recommendations will be used to guide preparation of any publication. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and sent to the major organisations with clinical practice guidelines for VAD care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12610000505000). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4322194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43221942015-02-13 Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole M Webster, Joan Gavin, Nicole C McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Corley, Amanda Long, Debbie Gowardman, John R Murgo, Marghie Fraser, John F Chan, Raymond J Wallis, Marianne C Young, Jeanine McMillan, David Zhang, Li Choudhury, Md Abu Graves, Nicholas Playford, E Geoffrey BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-monitoring transducers and/or burettes. While VADs are replaced only when necessary, AS are routinely replaced every 3–4 days in the belief that this reduces infectious complications. Strong evidence supports AS use up to 4 days, but there is less evidence for AS use beyond 4 days. AS replacement twice weekly increases hospital costs and workload. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of equivalence design comparing AS replacement at 4 (control) versus 7 (experimental) days. Randomisation is stratified by site and device, centrally allocated and concealed until enrolment. 6554 adult/paediatric patients with a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter or peripheral arterial catheter will be enrolled over 4 years. The primary outcome is VAD-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and secondary outcomes are VAD colonisation, AS colonisation, all-cause BSI, all-cause mortality, number of AS per patient, VAD time in situ and costs. Relative incidence rates of VAD-BSI per 100 devices and hazard rates per 1000 device days (95% CIs) will summarise the impact of 7-day relative to 4-day AS use and test equivalence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare VAD-BSI over time. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques will be used to compare secondary end points. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical approvals have been received. CONSORT Statement recommendations will be used to guide preparation of any publication. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and sent to the major organisations with clinical practice guidelines for VAD care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12610000505000). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4322194/ /pubmed/25649214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Nursing Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole M Webster, Joan Gavin, Nicole C McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Corley, Amanda Long, Debbie Gowardman, John R Murgo, Marghie Fraser, John F Chan, Raymond J Wallis, Marianne C Young, Jeanine McMillan, David Zhang, Li Choudhury, Md Abu Graves, Nicholas Playford, E Geoffrey Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title | Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title_full | Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title_fullStr | Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title_short | Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial) |
title_sort | intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients—a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the rsvp trial) |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rickardclairem intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT marshnicolem intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT websterjoan intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT gavinnicolec intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT mcgrailmatthewr intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT larsenemily intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT corleyamanda intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT longdebbie intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT gowardmanjohnr intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT murgomarghie intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT fraserjohnf intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT chanraymondj intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT wallismariannec intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT youngjeanine intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT mcmillandavid intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT zhangli intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT choudhurymdabu intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT gravesnicholas intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial AT playfordegeoffrey intravasculardeviceadministrationsetsreplacementafterstandardversusprolongeduseinhospitalisedpatientsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialthersvptrial |