Cargando…

TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression. DESIGN: The model was based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salisbury, Chris, Thomas, Clare, O'Cathain, Alicia, Rogers, Anne, Pope, Catherine, Yardley, Lucy, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Fahey, Tom, Lewis, Glyn, Large, Shirley, Edwards, Louisa, Rowsell, Alison, Segar, Julia, Brownsell, Simon, Montgomery, Alan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006448
_version_ 1782356343645011968
author Salisbury, Chris
Thomas, Clare
O'Cathain, Alicia
Rogers, Anne
Pope, Catherine
Yardley, Lucy
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Fahey, Tom
Lewis, Glyn
Large, Shirley
Edwards, Louisa
Rowsell, Alison
Segar, Julia
Brownsell, Simon
Montgomery, Alan A
author_facet Salisbury, Chris
Thomas, Clare
O'Cathain, Alicia
Rogers, Anne
Pope, Catherine
Yardley, Lucy
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Fahey, Tom
Lewis, Glyn
Large, Shirley
Edwards, Louisa
Rowsell, Alison
Segar, Julia
Brownsell, Simon
Montgomery, Alan A
author_sort Salisbury, Chris
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression. DESIGN: The model was based on several strands of evidence: a metareview and realist synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence on telehealth for chronic conditions; a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ experience of telehealth; a quantitative survey of patients’ interest in using telehealth; and review of existing models of chronic condition management and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Based on these evidence strands, a model was developed and then refined at a stakeholder workshop. Then a telehealth intervention (‘Healthlines’) was designed by incorporating strategies to address each of the model components. The model also provided a framework for evaluation of this intervention within parallel randomised controlled trials in the two exemplar conditions, and the accompanying process evaluations and economic evaluations. SETTING: Primary care. RESULTS: The TElehealth in CHronic Disease (TECH) model proposes that attention to four components will offer interventions the best chance of success: (1) engagement of patients and health professionals, (2) effective chronic disease management (including subcomponents of self-management, optimisation of treatment, care coordination), (3) partnership between providers and (4) patient, social and health system context. Key intended outcomes are improved health, access to care, patient experience and cost-effective care. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model has been developed based on multiple sources of evidence which articulates how telehealth may best provide benefits for patients with chronic health conditions. It can be used to structure the design and evaluation of telehealth programmes which aim to be acceptable to patients and providers, and cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43222022015-02-13 TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation Salisbury, Chris Thomas, Clare O'Cathain, Alicia Rogers, Anne Pope, Catherine Yardley, Lucy Hollinghurst, Sandra Fahey, Tom Lewis, Glyn Large, Shirley Edwards, Louisa Rowsell, Alison Segar, Julia Brownsell, Simon Montgomery, Alan A BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression. DESIGN: The model was based on several strands of evidence: a metareview and realist synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence on telehealth for chronic conditions; a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ experience of telehealth; a quantitative survey of patients’ interest in using telehealth; and review of existing models of chronic condition management and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Based on these evidence strands, a model was developed and then refined at a stakeholder workshop. Then a telehealth intervention (‘Healthlines’) was designed by incorporating strategies to address each of the model components. The model also provided a framework for evaluation of this intervention within parallel randomised controlled trials in the two exemplar conditions, and the accompanying process evaluations and economic evaluations. SETTING: Primary care. RESULTS: The TElehealth in CHronic Disease (TECH) model proposes that attention to four components will offer interventions the best chance of success: (1) engagement of patients and health professionals, (2) effective chronic disease management (including subcomponents of self-management, optimisation of treatment, care coordination), (3) partnership between providers and (4) patient, social and health system context. Key intended outcomes are improved health, access to care, patient experience and cost-effective care. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model has been developed based on multiple sources of evidence which articulates how telehealth may best provide benefits for patients with chronic health conditions. It can be used to structure the design and evaluation of telehealth programmes which aim to be acceptable to patients and providers, and cost-effective. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4322202/ /pubmed/25659890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006448 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Salisbury, Chris
Thomas, Clare
O'Cathain, Alicia
Rogers, Anne
Pope, Catherine
Yardley, Lucy
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Fahey, Tom
Lewis, Glyn
Large, Shirley
Edwards, Louisa
Rowsell, Alison
Segar, Julia
Brownsell, Simon
Montgomery, Alan A
TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title_full TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title_fullStr TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title_short TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
title_sort telehealth in chronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the tech conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006448
work_keys_str_mv AT salisburychris telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT thomasclare telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT ocathainalicia telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT rogersanne telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT popecatherine telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT yardleylucy telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT hollinghurstsandra telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT faheytom telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT lewisglyn telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT largeshirley telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT edwardslouisa telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT rowsellalison telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT segarjulia telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT brownsellsimon telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation
AT montgomeryalana telehealthinchronicdiseasemixedmethodsstudytodevelopthetechconceptualmodelforinterventiondesignandevaluation