Cargando…
Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685 |
_version_ | 1782356346246529024 |
---|---|
author | Almost, Joan Wolff, Angela Mildon, Barbara Price, Sheri Godfrey, Christina Robinson, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda Mercado-Mallari, Sheile |
author_facet | Almost, Joan Wolff, Angela Mildon, Barbara Price, Sheri Godfrey, Christina Robinson, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda Mercado-Mallari, Sheile |
author_sort | Almost, Joan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery and, ultimately, clinical outcomes. Despite a considerable amount of literature in this area, there is a lack of clarity of the different behaviours as several parallel literatures address similar questions about antecedents, processes and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current state of literature reporting on behaviours in workplace relationships. Using a scoping review methodology, the following research question will be addressed: “What is known about positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships?” METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The search strategy will include numerous electronic databases, grey literature sources and hand-searching of reference lists from 1990 to present with a limit to English language. Search strategies will be developed using controlled vocabulary and keyword terms related to various components of workplace relationships. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potential articles to determine final inclusion. A descriptive numerical analysis will describe characteristics of included studies. A thematic analysis will provide an overview of the literature, including definitions, conceptual frameworks, antecedents, outcomes and interventions. DISSEMINATION: In reviewing a wide range of positive and negative behaviours, then integrating into a manageable, meaningful whole, this study is a critical step in helping policymakers, leaders and healthcare professionals effectively use what is known thus far. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the study with dissemination of findings to local, national, and international stakeholders, including a wide range of clinicians, leaders and administrators in all sectors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4322213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43222132015-02-13 Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol Almost, Joan Wolff, Angela Mildon, Barbara Price, Sheri Godfrey, Christina Robinson, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda Mercado-Mallari, Sheile BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery and, ultimately, clinical outcomes. Despite a considerable amount of literature in this area, there is a lack of clarity of the different behaviours as several parallel literatures address similar questions about antecedents, processes and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current state of literature reporting on behaviours in workplace relationships. Using a scoping review methodology, the following research question will be addressed: “What is known about positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships?” METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The search strategy will include numerous electronic databases, grey literature sources and hand-searching of reference lists from 1990 to present with a limit to English language. Search strategies will be developed using controlled vocabulary and keyword terms related to various components of workplace relationships. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potential articles to determine final inclusion. A descriptive numerical analysis will describe characteristics of included studies. A thematic analysis will provide an overview of the literature, including definitions, conceptual frameworks, antecedents, outcomes and interventions. DISSEMINATION: In reviewing a wide range of positive and negative behaviours, then integrating into a manageable, meaningful whole, this study is a critical step in helping policymakers, leaders and healthcare professionals effectively use what is known thus far. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the study with dissemination of findings to local, national, and international stakeholders, including a wide range of clinicians, leaders and administrators in all sectors. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4322213/ /pubmed/25652806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Almost, Joan Wolff, Angela Mildon, Barbara Price, Sheri Godfrey, Christina Robinson, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda Mercado-Mallari, Sheile Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title | Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almostjoan positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT wolffangela positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT mildonbarbara positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT pricesheri positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT godfreychristina positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT robinsonsandra positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT rosswhiteamanda positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol AT mercadomallarisheile positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol |