Cargando…

Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almost, Joan, Wolff, Angela, Mildon, Barbara, Price, Sheri, Godfrey, Christina, Robinson, Sandra, Ross-White, Amanda, Mercado-Mallari, Sheile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685
_version_ 1782356346246529024
author Almost, Joan
Wolff, Angela
Mildon, Barbara
Price, Sheri
Godfrey, Christina
Robinson, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
Mercado-Mallari, Sheile
author_facet Almost, Joan
Wolff, Angela
Mildon, Barbara
Price, Sheri
Godfrey, Christina
Robinson, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
Mercado-Mallari, Sheile
author_sort Almost, Joan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery and, ultimately, clinical outcomes. Despite a considerable amount of literature in this area, there is a lack of clarity of the different behaviours as several parallel literatures address similar questions about antecedents, processes and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current state of literature reporting on behaviours in workplace relationships. Using a scoping review methodology, the following research question will be addressed: “What is known about positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships?” METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The search strategy will include numerous electronic databases, grey literature sources and hand-searching of reference lists from 1990 to present with a limit to English language. Search strategies will be developed using controlled vocabulary and keyword terms related to various components of workplace relationships. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potential articles to determine final inclusion. A descriptive numerical analysis will describe characteristics of included studies. A thematic analysis will provide an overview of the literature, including definitions, conceptual frameworks, antecedents, outcomes and interventions. DISSEMINATION: In reviewing a wide range of positive and negative behaviours, then integrating into a manageable, meaningful whole, this study is a critical step in helping policymakers, leaders and healthcare professionals effectively use what is known thus far. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the study with dissemination of findings to local, national, and international stakeholders, including a wide range of clinicians, leaders and administrators in all sectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43222132015-02-13 Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol Almost, Joan Wolff, Angela Mildon, Barbara Price, Sheri Godfrey, Christina Robinson, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda Mercado-Mallari, Sheile BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Engaging in teamwork requires a clear understanding of positive and negative behaviours that act as facilitators and barriers to collegial workplace relationships. Identifying and correcting underlying barriers, while promoting facilitators, is fundamental to improving care delivery and, ultimately, clinical outcomes. Despite a considerable amount of literature in this area, there is a lack of clarity of the different behaviours as several parallel literatures address similar questions about antecedents, processes and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the current state of literature reporting on behaviours in workplace relationships. Using a scoping review methodology, the following research question will be addressed: “What is known about positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships?” METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The search strategy will include numerous electronic databases, grey literature sources and hand-searching of reference lists from 1990 to present with a limit to English language. Search strategies will be developed using controlled vocabulary and keyword terms related to various components of workplace relationships. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potential articles to determine final inclusion. A descriptive numerical analysis will describe characteristics of included studies. A thematic analysis will provide an overview of the literature, including definitions, conceptual frameworks, antecedents, outcomes and interventions. DISSEMINATION: In reviewing a wide range of positive and negative behaviours, then integrating into a manageable, meaningful whole, this study is a critical step in helping policymakers, leaders and healthcare professionals effectively use what is known thus far. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the study with dissemination of findings to local, national, and international stakeholders, including a wide range of clinicians, leaders and administrators in all sectors. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4322213/ /pubmed/25652806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Almost, Joan
Wolff, Angela
Mildon, Barbara
Price, Sheri
Godfrey, Christina
Robinson, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
Mercado-Mallari, Sheile
Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title_full Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title_short Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
title_sort positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007685
work_keys_str_mv AT almostjoan positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT wolffangela positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT mildonbarbara positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT pricesheri positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT godfreychristina positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT robinsonsandra positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT rosswhiteamanda positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol
AT mercadomallarisheile positiveandnegativebehavioursinworkplacerelationshipsascopingreviewprotocol