Cargando…
Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU re...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25695001 |
_version_ | 1782356364010455040 |
---|---|
author | Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba Khatami, Farnaz |
author_facet | Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba Khatami, Farnaz |
author_sort | Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU resources. Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 246 patients admitted to 9 general ICUs in Tehran, from September 2011 to March 2012. Patients staying for≤2 days in the ICU were compared to each other after being categorized into two medical and surgical groups. Results: Of 129 patients with≤2 days ICU stay (52.4%), 88.4% survived. Of these, 25 (19.4%) were placed in the medical and 104 (80.6%) to surgical groups. Survival rates were significantly greater in surgical group; only 7.7% of them were in need of mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours of admission (p<0.001). In contrast to medical group, the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in the surgical group was significantly lower (9.8±3.6 and 17.3±5.8) (p<0.001). Conclusion: The majority of patients with≤2 days LOS in the surgical group hospitalized for monitoring after surgery had low mortality rate and APACHE-II score. Therefore, it would seem that transferring such patients to the intermediate care unit leads to more efficient and optimal use of ICU resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4322340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Iran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43223402015-02-18 Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba Khatami, Farnaz Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU resources. Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 246 patients admitted to 9 general ICUs in Tehran, from September 2011 to March 2012. Patients staying for≤2 days in the ICU were compared to each other after being categorized into two medical and surgical groups. Results: Of 129 patients with≤2 days ICU stay (52.4%), 88.4% survived. Of these, 25 (19.4%) were placed in the medical and 104 (80.6%) to surgical groups. Survival rates were significantly greater in surgical group; only 7.7% of them were in need of mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours of admission (p<0.001). In contrast to medical group, the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in the surgical group was significantly lower (9.8±3.6 and 17.3±5.8) (p<0.001). Conclusion: The majority of patients with≤2 days LOS in the surgical group hospitalized for monitoring after surgery had low mortality rate and APACHE-II score. Therefore, it would seem that transferring such patients to the intermediate care unit leads to more efficient and optimal use of ICU resources. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4322340/ /pubmed/25695001 Text en © 2014 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba Khatami, Farnaz Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title | Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title_full | Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title_fullStr | Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title_short | Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
title_sort | short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25695001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sedaghatsiyahkalmojtaba shortstayingeneralintensivecareunitsisitalwaysnecessary AT khatamifarnaz shortstayingeneralintensivecareunitsisitalwaysnecessary |