Cargando…

Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?

Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba, Khatami, Farnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25695001
_version_ 1782356364010455040
author Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba
Khatami, Farnaz
author_facet Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba
Khatami, Farnaz
author_sort Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba
collection PubMed
description Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU resources. Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 246 patients admitted to 9 general ICUs in Tehran, from September 2011 to March 2012. Patients staying for≤2 days in the ICU were compared to each other after being categorized into two medical and surgical groups. Results: Of 129 patients with≤2 days ICU stay (52.4%), 88.4% survived. Of these, 25 (19.4%) were placed in the medical and 104 (80.6%) to surgical groups. Survival rates were significantly greater in surgical group; only 7.7% of them were in need of mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours of admission (p<0.001). In contrast to medical group, the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in the surgical group was significantly lower (9.8±3.6 and 17.3±5.8) (p<0.001). Conclusion: The majority of patients with≤2 days LOS in the surgical group hospitalized for monitoring after surgery had low mortality rate and APACHE-II score. Therefore, it would seem that transferring such patients to the intermediate care unit leads to more efficient and optimal use of ICU resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43223402015-02-18 Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary? Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba Khatami, Farnaz Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: There are challenges ahead of short-term hospitalization of low-risk patients hospitalized only for monitoring of severe disease who may die soon after admission. The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies forthe management of ICU stay lengths and to ensure optimal use of ICU resources. Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 246 patients admitted to 9 general ICUs in Tehran, from September 2011 to March 2012. Patients staying for≤2 days in the ICU were compared to each other after being categorized into two medical and surgical groups. Results: Of 129 patients with≤2 days ICU stay (52.4%), 88.4% survived. Of these, 25 (19.4%) were placed in the medical and 104 (80.6%) to surgical groups. Survival rates were significantly greater in surgical group; only 7.7% of them were in need of mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours of admission (p<0.001). In contrast to medical group, the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in the surgical group was significantly lower (9.8±3.6 and 17.3±5.8) (p<0.001). Conclusion: The majority of patients with≤2 days LOS in the surgical group hospitalized for monitoring after surgery had low mortality rate and APACHE-II score. Therefore, it would seem that transferring such patients to the intermediate care unit leads to more efficient and optimal use of ICU resources. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4322340/ /pubmed/25695001 Text en © 2014 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sedaghat Siyahkal, Mojtaba
Khatami, Farnaz
Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title_full Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title_fullStr Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title_short Short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
title_sort short stay in general intensive care units: is it always necessary?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25695001
work_keys_str_mv AT sedaghatsiyahkalmojtaba shortstayingeneralintensivecareunitsisitalwaysnecessary
AT khatamifarnaz shortstayingeneralintensivecareunitsisitalwaysnecessary