Cargando…

Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to find out how much energy is applicable in second-generation dual source high-pitch computed tomography (CT) in imaging of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined an upper abdominal phantom using a Somatom Definition Flash CT-Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beeres, Martin, Bauer, Ralf W, Kerl, Josef M, Vogl, Thomas J, Lee, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.150441
_version_ 1782356373316567040
author Beeres, Martin
Bauer, Ralf W
Kerl, Josef M
Vogl, Thomas J
Lee, Clara
author_facet Beeres, Martin
Bauer, Ralf W
Kerl, Josef M
Vogl, Thomas J
Lee, Clara
author_sort Beeres, Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to find out how much energy is applicable in second-generation dual source high-pitch computed tomography (CT) in imaging of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined an upper abdominal phantom using a Somatom Definition Flash CT-Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). The study protocol consisted of a scan-series at 100 kV and 120 kV. In each scan series we started with a pitch of 3.2 and reduced it in steps of 0.2, until a pitch of 1.6 was reached. The current was adjusted to the maximum the scanner could achieve. Energy values, image noise, image quality, and radiation exposure were evaluated. RESULTS: For a pitch of 3.2 the maximum applicable current was 142 mAs at 120 kV and in 100 kV the maximum applicable current was 114 mAs. For conventional abdominal imaging, current levels of 200 to 260 mAs are generally used. To achieve similar current levels, we had to decrease the pitch to 1.8 at 100 kV — at this pitch we could perform our imaging at 204 mAs. At a pitch of 2.2 in 120 kV we could apply a current of 206 mAs. CONCLUSION: We conclude our study by stating that if there is a need for a higher current, we have to reduce the pitch. In a high-pitch dual source CT, we always have to remember where our main focus is, so we can adjust the pitch to the energy we need in the area of the body that has to be imaged, to find answers to the clinical question being raised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43223812015-03-24 Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom Beeres, Martin Bauer, Ralf W Kerl, Josef M Vogl, Thomas J Lee, Clara J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to find out how much energy is applicable in second-generation dual source high-pitch computed tomography (CT) in imaging of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined an upper abdominal phantom using a Somatom Definition Flash CT-Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). The study protocol consisted of a scan-series at 100 kV and 120 kV. In each scan series we started with a pitch of 3.2 and reduced it in steps of 0.2, until a pitch of 1.6 was reached. The current was adjusted to the maximum the scanner could achieve. Energy values, image noise, image quality, and radiation exposure were evaluated. RESULTS: For a pitch of 3.2 the maximum applicable current was 142 mAs at 120 kV and in 100 kV the maximum applicable current was 114 mAs. For conventional abdominal imaging, current levels of 200 to 260 mAs are generally used. To achieve similar current levels, we had to decrease the pitch to 1.8 at 100 kV — at this pitch we could perform our imaging at 204 mAs. At a pitch of 2.2 in 120 kV we could apply a current of 206 mAs. CONCLUSION: We conclude our study by stating that if there is a need for a higher current, we have to reduce the pitch. In a high-pitch dual source CT, we always have to remember where our main focus is, so we can adjust the pitch to the energy we need in the area of the body that has to be imaged, to find answers to the clinical question being raised. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4322381/ /pubmed/25806137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.150441 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Jensen JM. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Beeres, Martin
Bauer, Ralf W
Kerl, Josef M
Vogl, Thomas J
Lee, Clara
Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title_full Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title_fullStr Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title_short Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom
title_sort energy limits in second generation high-pitch dual source ct - comparison in an upper abdominal phantom
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.150441
work_keys_str_mv AT beeresmartin energylimitsinsecondgenerationhighpitchdualsourcectcomparisoninanupperabdominalphantom
AT bauerralfw energylimitsinsecondgenerationhighpitchdualsourcectcomparisoninanupperabdominalphantom
AT kerljosefm energylimitsinsecondgenerationhighpitchdualsourcectcomparisoninanupperabdominalphantom
AT voglthomasj energylimitsinsecondgenerationhighpitchdualsourcectcomparisoninanupperabdominalphantom
AT leeclara energylimitsinsecondgenerationhighpitchdualsourcectcomparisoninanupperabdominalphantom