Cargando…

Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Olivia, Nancarrow, Susan A, Borthwick, Alan M, Grace, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1
_version_ 1782356446116052992
author King, Olivia
Nancarrow, Susan A
Borthwick, Alan M
Grace, Sandra
author_facet King, Olivia
Nancarrow, Susan A
Borthwick, Alan M
Grace, Sandra
author_sort King, Olivia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure. RESULTS: The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4322807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43228072015-02-11 Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature King, Olivia Nancarrow, Susan A Borthwick, Alan M Grace, Sandra J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure. RESULTS: The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena. BioMed Central 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4322807/ /pubmed/25670968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1 Text en © King et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
King, Olivia
Nancarrow, Susan A
Borthwick, Alan M
Grace, Sandra
Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kingolivia contestedprofessionalroleboundariesinhealthcareasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT nancarrowsusana contestedprofessionalroleboundariesinhealthcareasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT borthwickalanm contestedprofessionalroleboundariesinhealthcareasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gracesandra contestedprofessionalroleboundariesinhealthcareasystematicreviewoftheliterature