Cargando…
Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick?
Many of the instructional practices that have been advanced as intrinsically motivating are inherent in socio-constructivist learning environments. There is now emerging scientific evidence to explain why interactive learning environments promote the intrinsic motivation to learn. The “two-body” and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00028 |
_version_ | 1782356455739883520 |
---|---|
author | Clark, Ian Dumas, Guillaume |
author_facet | Clark, Ian Dumas, Guillaume |
author_sort | Clark, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many of the instructional practices that have been advanced as intrinsically motivating are inherent in socio-constructivist learning environments. There is now emerging scientific evidence to explain why interactive learning environments promote the intrinsic motivation to learn. The “two-body” and “second person” approaches have begun to explore the “dark matter” of social neuroscience: the intra- and inter-individual brain dynamics during social interaction. Moreover, studies indicate that when young learners are given expanded opportunities to actively and equitably participate in collaborative learning activities they experienced feelings of well-being, contentment, or even excitement. Neuroscience starts demonstrating how this naturally rewarding aspect is strongly associated with the implication of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway during social interaction. The production of dopamine reinforces the desire to continue the interaction, and heightens feelings of anticipation for future peer-learning activities. Here we review how cooperative learning and problem-solving interactions can bring about the “intrinsic” motivation to learn. Overall, the reported theoretical arguments and neuroscientific results have clear implications for school and organization approaches and support social constructivist perspectives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4322849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43228492015-02-24 Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? Clark, Ian Dumas, Guillaume Front Psychol Psychology Many of the instructional practices that have been advanced as intrinsically motivating are inherent in socio-constructivist learning environments. There is now emerging scientific evidence to explain why interactive learning environments promote the intrinsic motivation to learn. The “two-body” and “second person” approaches have begun to explore the “dark matter” of social neuroscience: the intra- and inter-individual brain dynamics during social interaction. Moreover, studies indicate that when young learners are given expanded opportunities to actively and equitably participate in collaborative learning activities they experienced feelings of well-being, contentment, or even excitement. Neuroscience starts demonstrating how this naturally rewarding aspect is strongly associated with the implication of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway during social interaction. The production of dopamine reinforces the desire to continue the interaction, and heightens feelings of anticipation for future peer-learning activities. Here we review how cooperative learning and problem-solving interactions can bring about the “intrinsic” motivation to learn. Overall, the reported theoretical arguments and neuroscientific results have clear implications for school and organization approaches and support social constructivist perspectives. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4322849/ /pubmed/25713542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00028 Text en Copyright © 2015 Clark and Dumas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Clark, Ian Dumas, Guillaume Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title | Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title_full | Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title_fullStr | Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title_short | Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
title_sort | toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkian towardaneuralbasisforpeerinteractionwhatmakespeerlearningtick AT dumasguillaume towardaneuralbasisforpeerinteractionwhatmakespeerlearningtick |