Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain is a major socioeconomic public health issue worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it is still a difficult-to-treat condition. The conservative analgesic therapy usually comprises a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazime, Fuad Ahmad, de Freitas, Diego Galace, Monteiro, Renan Lima, Maretto, Rafaela Lasso, Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida de Almeida, Hasue, Renata Hydee, João, Silvia Maria Amado
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1
_version_ 1782356508331212800
author Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
de Freitas, Diego Galace
Monteiro, Renan Lima
Maretto, Rafaela Lasso
Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida de Almeida
Hasue, Renata Hydee
João, Silvia Maria Amado
author_facet Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
de Freitas, Diego Galace
Monteiro, Renan Lima
Maretto, Rafaela Lasso
Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida de Almeida
Hasue, Renata Hydee
João, Silvia Maria Amado
author_sort Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain is a major socioeconomic public health issue worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it is still a difficult-to-treat condition. The conservative analgesic therapy usually comprises a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The neuromatrix pain model and the new findings on the process of chronicity of pain point to a higher effectiveness of treatments that address central rather than peripheral structures. The transcranial direct current stimulation is a noninvasive technique of neuromodulation that has made recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain. The simultaneous combination of these two electrostimulation techniques (cerebral and peripheral) can provide an analgesic effect superior to isolated interventions. However, all the evidence on the analgesic efficacy of these techniques, alone or combined, is still fragmented. This is a protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate whether cerebral electrical stimulation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation is more effective in relieving pain than the isolated application of electrical stimulations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-two patients will be randomized into four groups to receive transcranial direct current stimulation (real/sham) + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (real/sham) for 12 sessions over a period of four weeks. The primary clinical outcome (pain intensity) and the secondary ones (sensory and affective aspects of pain, physical functioning and global perceived effect) will be recorded before treatment, after four weeks, in Month 3 and in Month 6 after randomization. Confounding factors such as anxiety and depression, the patient’s satisfaction with treatment and adverse effects will also be listed. Data will be collected by an examiner unaware of (blind to) the treatment allocation. DISCUSSION: The results of this study may assist in clinical decision-making about the combined use of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation for pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01896453
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4323215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43232152015-02-11 Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial Hazime, Fuad Ahmad de Freitas, Diego Galace Monteiro, Renan Lima Maretto, Rafaela Lasso Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida de Almeida Hasue, Renata Hydee João, Silvia Maria Amado BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain is a major socioeconomic public health issue worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it is still a difficult-to-treat condition. The conservative analgesic therapy usually comprises a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The neuromatrix pain model and the new findings on the process of chronicity of pain point to a higher effectiveness of treatments that address central rather than peripheral structures. The transcranial direct current stimulation is a noninvasive technique of neuromodulation that has made recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain. The simultaneous combination of these two electrostimulation techniques (cerebral and peripheral) can provide an analgesic effect superior to isolated interventions. However, all the evidence on the analgesic efficacy of these techniques, alone or combined, is still fragmented. This is a protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate whether cerebral electrical stimulation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation is more effective in relieving pain than the isolated application of electrical stimulations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-two patients will be randomized into four groups to receive transcranial direct current stimulation (real/sham) + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (real/sham) for 12 sessions over a period of four weeks. The primary clinical outcome (pain intensity) and the secondary ones (sensory and affective aspects of pain, physical functioning and global perceived effect) will be recorded before treatment, after four weeks, in Month 3 and in Month 6 after randomization. Confounding factors such as anxiety and depression, the patient’s satisfaction with treatment and adverse effects will also be listed. Data will be collected by an examiner unaware of (blind to) the treatment allocation. DISCUSSION: The results of this study may assist in clinical decision-making about the combined use of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation for pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01896453 BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4323215/ /pubmed/25636503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1 Text en © Hazime et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
de Freitas, Diego Galace
Monteiro, Renan Lima
Maretto, Rafaela Lasso
Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida de Almeida
Hasue, Renata Hydee
João, Silvia Maria Amado
Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title_full Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title_short Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
title_sort analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hazimefuadahmad analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT defreitasdiegogalace analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT monteirorenanlima analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT marettorafaelalasso analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT carvalhonilzaaparecidadealmeida analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT hasuerenatahydee analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial
AT joaosilviamariaamado analgesicefficacyofcerebralandperipheralelectricalstimulationinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindfactorialclinicaltrial