Cargando…
Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with unresectable, multiple or advanced locally/regionally metastatic stage IIIB/C or stage IV M1a melanoma have a high risk for recurrence, progression and metastasis. The article reviews treatment advances for this population. RECENT FINDINGS: After promising phase 2 re...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000158 |
_version_ | 1782356559120039936 |
---|---|
author | Agarwala, Sanjiv S. |
author_facet | Agarwala, Sanjiv S. |
author_sort | Agarwala, Sanjiv S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with unresectable, multiple or advanced locally/regionally metastatic stage IIIB/C or stage IV M1a melanoma have a high risk for recurrence, progression and metastasis. The article reviews treatment advances for this population. RECENT FINDINGS: After promising phase 2 results with Allovectin-7 (velimogene aliplasmid), overall survival in a phase 3 study was shorter for Allovectin-7 than for dacarbazine/temozolomide (median 18.8 versus 24.1 months). In a phase 2 trial of intratumoral electroporation of plasmid interleukin-12 among 28 patients with advanced melanoma, the primary endpoint of best overall response rate within 24 weeks of first treatment was 32.2% for objective response and 10.7% for complete response. In the phase 3 OPTiM trial of talimogene laherparepvec, the intralesional agent that is furthest along in clinical testing, the primary endpoint of durable response rate was 16% for talimogene laherparepvec and 2% for granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. In the PV-10 phase 2 trial among 80 patients with stage III–IV melanoma, the overall response rate was 51%, with a 26% complete response rate. SUMMARY: Despite advances, many patients will need several lines of therapy. Some will not be eligible for systemic therapy. Their low toxicity, easy administration and likely systemic immune effects make intralesional therapies an attractive option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4323546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43235462015-02-17 Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Curr Opin Oncol MELANOMA AND OTHER SKIN NEOPLASMS: Edited by Reinhard Dummer PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with unresectable, multiple or advanced locally/regionally metastatic stage IIIB/C or stage IV M1a melanoma have a high risk for recurrence, progression and metastasis. The article reviews treatment advances for this population. RECENT FINDINGS: After promising phase 2 results with Allovectin-7 (velimogene aliplasmid), overall survival in a phase 3 study was shorter for Allovectin-7 than for dacarbazine/temozolomide (median 18.8 versus 24.1 months). In a phase 2 trial of intratumoral electroporation of plasmid interleukin-12 among 28 patients with advanced melanoma, the primary endpoint of best overall response rate within 24 weeks of first treatment was 32.2% for objective response and 10.7% for complete response. In the phase 3 OPTiM trial of talimogene laherparepvec, the intralesional agent that is furthest along in clinical testing, the primary endpoint of durable response rate was 16% for talimogene laherparepvec and 2% for granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. In the PV-10 phase 2 trial among 80 patients with stage III–IV melanoma, the overall response rate was 51%, with a 26% complete response rate. SUMMARY: Despite advances, many patients will need several lines of therapy. Some will not be eligible for systemic therapy. Their low toxicity, easy administration and likely systemic immune effects make intralesional therapies an attractive option. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-03 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4323546/ /pubmed/25629369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000158 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | MELANOMA AND OTHER SKIN NEOPLASMS: Edited by Reinhard Dummer Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title | Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title_full | Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title_fullStr | Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title_short | Intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
title_sort | intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma: promise and limitation |
topic | MELANOMA AND OTHER SKIN NEOPLASMS: Edited by Reinhard Dummer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalasanjivs intralesionaltherapyforadvancedmelanomapromiseandlimitation |