Cargando…
Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950 |
_version_ | 1782356601862094848 |
---|---|
author | Heidenreich, Paul A. Zhao, Xin Hernandez, Adrian F. Yancy, Clyde W. Schwamm, Lee H. Albert, Nancy M. Fonarow, Gregg C. |
author_facet | Heidenreich, Paul A. Zhao, Xin Hernandez, Adrian F. Yancy, Clyde W. Schwamm, Lee H. Albert, Nancy M. Fonarow, Gregg C. |
author_sort | Heidenreich, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to acceleration in quality of care for all hospitals participating in the program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined hospital‐level performance on 9 quality‐of‐care (process) measures that were added to an existing recognition program (based on existing published performance measures). The rate of increase in use over time 6 months to 2 years after the start of the program was compared with the rate of increase in use for the measures during the 18‐month period prior to the start of the program. Use increased for all 9 new quality measures from 2008 to 2011. Among 4 measures with baseline use near or lower than 50%, a statistically significant greater increase in use during the program was seen for implantable cardioverter defibrillator use (program versus preprogram use: odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23). Among the 5 measures for which baseline use was 50% or higher, the increase in influenza vaccination rates actually slowed. There was no evidence of adverse impact on the 4 established quality measures, a composite of which actually increased faster during the expanded program (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: A program providing expanded hospital recognition for heart failure had mixed results in accelerating the use of 9 quality measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4323821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43238212015-02-23 Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care Heidenreich, Paul A. Zhao, Xin Hernandez, Adrian F. Yancy, Clyde W. Schwamm, Lee H. Albert, Nancy M. Fonarow, Gregg C. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to acceleration in quality of care for all hospitals participating in the program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined hospital‐level performance on 9 quality‐of‐care (process) measures that were added to an existing recognition program (based on existing published performance measures). The rate of increase in use over time 6 months to 2 years after the start of the program was compared with the rate of increase in use for the measures during the 18‐month period prior to the start of the program. Use increased for all 9 new quality measures from 2008 to 2011. Among 4 measures with baseline use near or lower than 50%, a statistically significant greater increase in use during the program was seen for implantable cardioverter defibrillator use (program versus preprogram use: odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23). Among the 5 measures for which baseline use was 50% or higher, the increase in influenza vaccination rates actually slowed. There was no evidence of adverse impact on the 4 established quality measures, a composite of which actually increased faster during the expanded program (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: A program providing expanded hospital recognition for heart failure had mixed results in accelerating the use of 9 quality measures. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4323821/ /pubmed/25208954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Heidenreich, Paul A. Zhao, Xin Hernandez, Adrian F. Yancy, Clyde W. Schwamm, Lee H. Albert, Nancy M. Fonarow, Gregg C. Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title | Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title_full | Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title_fullStr | Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title_short | Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care |
title_sort | impact of an expanded hospital recognition program for heart failure quality of care |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heidenreichpaula impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT zhaoxin impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT hernandezadrianf impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT yancyclydew impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT schwammleeh impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT albertnancym impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare AT fonarowgreggc impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare |