Cargando…

Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heidenreich, Paul A., Zhao, Xin, Hernandez, Adrian F., Yancy, Clyde W., Schwamm, Lee H., Albert, Nancy M., Fonarow, Gregg C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950
_version_ 1782356601862094848
author Heidenreich, Paul A.
Zhao, Xin
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Yancy, Clyde W.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Albert, Nancy M.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
author_facet Heidenreich, Paul A.
Zhao, Xin
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Yancy, Clyde W.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Albert, Nancy M.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
author_sort Heidenreich, Paul A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to acceleration in quality of care for all hospitals participating in the program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined hospital‐level performance on 9 quality‐of‐care (process) measures that were added to an existing recognition program (based on existing published performance measures). The rate of increase in use over time 6 months to 2 years after the start of the program was compared with the rate of increase in use for the measures during the 18‐month period prior to the start of the program. Use increased for all 9 new quality measures from 2008 to 2011. Among 4 measures with baseline use near or lower than 50%, a statistically significant greater increase in use during the program was seen for implantable cardioverter defibrillator use (program versus preprogram use: odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23). Among the 5 measures for which baseline use was 50% or higher, the increase in influenza vaccination rates actually slowed. There was no evidence of adverse impact on the 4 established quality measures, a composite of which actually increased faster during the expanded program (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: A program providing expanded hospital recognition for heart failure had mixed results in accelerating the use of 9 quality measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4323821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43238212015-02-23 Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care Heidenreich, Paul A. Zhao, Xin Hernandez, Adrian F. Yancy, Clyde W. Schwamm, Lee H. Albert, Nancy M. Fonarow, Gregg C. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to acceleration in quality of care for all hospitals participating in the program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined hospital‐level performance on 9 quality‐of‐care (process) measures that were added to an existing recognition program (based on existing published performance measures). The rate of increase in use over time 6 months to 2 years after the start of the program was compared with the rate of increase in use for the measures during the 18‐month period prior to the start of the program. Use increased for all 9 new quality measures from 2008 to 2011. Among 4 measures with baseline use near or lower than 50%, a statistically significant greater increase in use during the program was seen for implantable cardioverter defibrillator use (program versus preprogram use: odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23). Among the 5 measures for which baseline use was 50% or higher, the increase in influenza vaccination rates actually slowed. There was no evidence of adverse impact on the 4 established quality measures, a composite of which actually increased faster during the expanded program (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: A program providing expanded hospital recognition for heart failure had mixed results in accelerating the use of 9 quality measures. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4323821/ /pubmed/25208954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Heidenreich, Paul A.
Zhao, Xin
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Yancy, Clyde W.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Albert, Nancy M.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title_full Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title_fullStr Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title_short Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care
title_sort impact of an expanded hospital recognition program for heart failure quality of care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000950
work_keys_str_mv AT heidenreichpaula impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT zhaoxin impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT hernandezadrianf impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT yancyclydew impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT schwammleeh impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT albertnancym impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare
AT fonarowgreggc impactofanexpandedhospitalrecognitionprogramforheartfailurequalityofcare