Cargando…

Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage

BACKGROUND: With the advancement of technologies there is more interest in the maintenance of the spine's biomechanical properties focusing on the preservation of the functional motion segment. In present article we describe our experience with 25 cases managed with artificial cervical discs wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cincu, Rafael, Lorente, Francisco de Asis, Gomez, Joaquin, Eiras, Jose, Agrawal, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685218
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.146608
_version_ 1782356614672547840
author Cincu, Rafael
Lorente, Francisco de Asis
Gomez, Joaquin
Eiras, Jose
Agrawal, Amit
author_facet Cincu, Rafael
Lorente, Francisco de Asis
Gomez, Joaquin
Eiras, Jose
Agrawal, Amit
author_sort Cincu, Rafael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advancement of technologies there is more interest in the maintenance of the spine's biomechanical properties focusing on the preservation of the functional motion segment. In present article we describe our experience with 25 cases managed with artificial cervical discs with 28 Solis cage following cervical discectomy with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All surgeries were performed by single surgeon from March 2004 to June 2005 with a follow-up till date. Patients with symptomatic single or multiple level diseases that had no prior cervical surgery were candidates for the study. Cohort demographics were comparable. Standardized clinical outcome measures and radiographic examinations were used at prescribed post-operative intervals to compare the treatment groups. Relief in radicular pain, cervical spine motion, and degenerative changes at follow-up were noted. RESULTS: In a total 53 cases, the mean age in prosthesis group was 47 years (age range: 30-63 years) and mean age in cage group was 44 years (32-62 years). Mean hospital stay was 2.7 days in both the groups. At 4 weeks complete cervical movements could be achieved in 19 cases in artificial disc group. Maintenance of movement after 7.5 years was in 76% of these patients. Lordosis was maintained in all cases till date. There was no mortality or wound infection in our series. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that artificial cervical disc could be an alternative to fixed spinal fusion as it represents the most physiological substitute of disc. However, there is need for further studies to support the use of artificial cervical disc prosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4323965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43239652015-02-13 Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage Cincu, Rafael Lorente, Francisco de Asis Gomez, Joaquin Eiras, Jose Agrawal, Amit Asian J Neurosurg Original Article BACKGROUND: With the advancement of technologies there is more interest in the maintenance of the spine's biomechanical properties focusing on the preservation of the functional motion segment. In present article we describe our experience with 25 cases managed with artificial cervical discs with 28 Solis cage following cervical discectomy with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All surgeries were performed by single surgeon from March 2004 to June 2005 with a follow-up till date. Patients with symptomatic single or multiple level diseases that had no prior cervical surgery were candidates for the study. Cohort demographics were comparable. Standardized clinical outcome measures and radiographic examinations were used at prescribed post-operative intervals to compare the treatment groups. Relief in radicular pain, cervical spine motion, and degenerative changes at follow-up were noted. RESULTS: In a total 53 cases, the mean age in prosthesis group was 47 years (age range: 30-63 years) and mean age in cage group was 44 years (32-62 years). Mean hospital stay was 2.7 days in both the groups. At 4 weeks complete cervical movements could be achieved in 19 cases in artificial disc group. Maintenance of movement after 7.5 years was in 76% of these patients. Lordosis was maintained in all cases till date. There was no mortality or wound infection in our series. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that artificial cervical disc could be an alternative to fixed spinal fusion as it represents the most physiological substitute of disc. However, there is need for further studies to support the use of artificial cervical disc prosthesis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4323965/ /pubmed/25685218 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.146608 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cincu, Rafael
Lorente, Francisco de Asis
Gomez, Joaquin
Eiras, Jose
Agrawal, Amit
Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title_full Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title_fullStr Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title_full_unstemmed Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title_short Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
title_sort long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: a comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4323965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685218
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.146608
work_keys_str_mv AT cincurafael longtermpreservationofmotionwithartificialcervicaldiscimplantsacomparisonbetweencervicaldiscreplacementandrigidfusionwithcage
AT lorentefranciscodeasis longtermpreservationofmotionwithartificialcervicaldiscimplantsacomparisonbetweencervicaldiscreplacementandrigidfusionwithcage
AT gomezjoaquin longtermpreservationofmotionwithartificialcervicaldiscimplantsacomparisonbetweencervicaldiscreplacementandrigidfusionwithcage
AT eirasjose longtermpreservationofmotionwithartificialcervicaldiscimplantsacomparisonbetweencervicaldiscreplacementandrigidfusionwithcage
AT agrawalamit longtermpreservationofmotionwithartificialcervicaldiscimplantsacomparisonbetweencervicaldiscreplacementandrigidfusionwithcage