Cargando…

Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has illuminated the development of human brain function. Some of this work in typically-developing youth has ostensibly captured neural underpinnings of adolescent behavior which is characterized by risk-seeking propensity, according to psychometric quest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjork, James M., Pardini, Dustin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.07.008
_version_ 1782356627965345792
author Bjork, James M.
Pardini, Dustin A.
author_facet Bjork, James M.
Pardini, Dustin A.
author_sort Bjork, James M.
collection PubMed
description Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has illuminated the development of human brain function. Some of this work in typically-developing youth has ostensibly captured neural underpinnings of adolescent behavior which is characterized by risk-seeking propensity, according to psychometric questionnaires and a wealth of anecdote. Notably, cross-sectional comparisons have revealed age-dependent differences between adolescents and other age groups in regional brain responsiveness to prospective or experienced rewards (usually greater in adolescents) or penalties (usually diminished in adolescents). These differences have been interpreted as reflecting an imbalance between motivational drive and behavioral control mechanisms, especially in mid-adolescence, thus promoting greater risk-taking. While intriguing, we caution here that researchers should be more circumspect in attributing clinically significant adolescent risky behavior to age-group differences in task-elicited fMRI responses from neurotypical subjects. This is because actual mortality and morbidity from behavioral causes (e.g. substance abuse, violence) by mid-adolescence is heavily concentrated in individuals who are not neurotypical, who rather have shown a lifelong history of behavioral disinhibition that frequently meets criteria for a disruptive behavior disorder, such as conduct disorder, oppositional-defiant disorder, or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. These young people are at extreme risk of poor psychosocial outcomes, and should be a focus of future neurodevelopmental research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4324055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43240552016-01-31 Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research Bjork, James M. Pardini, Dustin A. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has illuminated the development of human brain function. Some of this work in typically-developing youth has ostensibly captured neural underpinnings of adolescent behavior which is characterized by risk-seeking propensity, according to psychometric questionnaires and a wealth of anecdote. Notably, cross-sectional comparisons have revealed age-dependent differences between adolescents and other age groups in regional brain responsiveness to prospective or experienced rewards (usually greater in adolescents) or penalties (usually diminished in adolescents). These differences have been interpreted as reflecting an imbalance between motivational drive and behavioral control mechanisms, especially in mid-adolescence, thus promoting greater risk-taking. While intriguing, we caution here that researchers should be more circumspect in attributing clinically significant adolescent risky behavior to age-group differences in task-elicited fMRI responses from neurotypical subjects. This is because actual mortality and morbidity from behavioral causes (e.g. substance abuse, violence) by mid-adolescence is heavily concentrated in individuals who are not neurotypical, who rather have shown a lifelong history of behavioral disinhibition that frequently meets criteria for a disruptive behavior disorder, such as conduct disorder, oppositional-defiant disorder, or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. These young people are at extreme risk of poor psychosocial outcomes, and should be a focus of future neurodevelopmental research. Elsevier 2014-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4324055/ /pubmed/25176616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.07.008 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bjork, James M.
Pardini, Dustin A.
Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title_full Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title_fullStr Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title_full_unstemmed Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title_short Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
title_sort who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.07.008
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorkjamesm whoarethoserisktakingadolescentsindividualdifferencesindevelopmentalneuroimagingresearch
AT pardinidustina whoarethoserisktakingadolescentsindividualdifferencesindevelopmentalneuroimagingresearch