Cargando…

Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply

Understanding interactions between grasses and their herbivores is central to the conservation of species-rich grasslands and the protection of our most important crops against pests. Grasses employ a range of defenses against their natural enemies; silicon-based defenses have been shown to be one o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartley, Sue E., Fitt, Rob N., McLarnon, Emma L., Wade, Ruth N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00035
_version_ 1782356629125070848
author Hartley, Sue E.
Fitt, Rob N.
McLarnon, Emma L.
Wade, Ruth N.
author_facet Hartley, Sue E.
Fitt, Rob N.
McLarnon, Emma L.
Wade, Ruth N.
author_sort Hartley, Sue E.
collection PubMed
description Understanding interactions between grasses and their herbivores is central to the conservation of species-rich grasslands and the protection of our most important crops against pests. Grasses employ a range of defenses against their natural enemies; silicon-based defenses have been shown to be one of the most effective. Silicon (Si) is laid down on the leaf surface as spines and other sharp bodies, known as phytoliths, making grasses abrasive and their foliage indigestible to herbivores. Previous studies on Si defenses found that closely related species may have similar levels of Si in the leaves but differ markedly in abrasiveness. Here we show how the number, shape and distribution of Si-rich phytoliths and spines differ within and between different grass species and demonstrate that species also differ in their ability to change the deposition and distribution of these defenses in response to damage or increases in Si supply. Specifically, we tested the response of two genotypes of Festuca arundinacea known to differ in their surface texture and three different grass species (F. ovina, F. rubra, and Deschampsia cespitosa) differing in their abrasiveness to combined manipulation of leaf damage and Si supply. F. arundinacea plants with a harsh leaf surface had higher Si content and more spines on their leaf surface than soft varieties. F. ovina and D. cespitosa plants increased their leaf Si concentration and produced an increase in the number of leaf spines and phytoliths on the leaf surface in response to Si addition. F rubra also increased leaf Si content in response to treatments, particularly in damaged leaves, but did not deposit this in the form of spines or increased densities of phytoliths. We discuss how the form in which grasses deposit Si may affect their anti-herbivore characteristics and consider the ecological and agricultural implications of the differences in allocation to Si-based defenses between grass species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4324063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43240632015-02-25 Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply Hartley, Sue E. Fitt, Rob N. McLarnon, Emma L. Wade, Ruth N. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Understanding interactions between grasses and their herbivores is central to the conservation of species-rich grasslands and the protection of our most important crops against pests. Grasses employ a range of defenses against their natural enemies; silicon-based defenses have been shown to be one of the most effective. Silicon (Si) is laid down on the leaf surface as spines and other sharp bodies, known as phytoliths, making grasses abrasive and their foliage indigestible to herbivores. Previous studies on Si defenses found that closely related species may have similar levels of Si in the leaves but differ markedly in abrasiveness. Here we show how the number, shape and distribution of Si-rich phytoliths and spines differ within and between different grass species and demonstrate that species also differ in their ability to change the deposition and distribution of these defenses in response to damage or increases in Si supply. Specifically, we tested the response of two genotypes of Festuca arundinacea known to differ in their surface texture and three different grass species (F. ovina, F. rubra, and Deschampsia cespitosa) differing in their abrasiveness to combined manipulation of leaf damage and Si supply. F. arundinacea plants with a harsh leaf surface had higher Si content and more spines on their leaf surface than soft varieties. F. ovina and D. cespitosa plants increased their leaf Si concentration and produced an increase in the number of leaf spines and phytoliths on the leaf surface in response to Si addition. F rubra also increased leaf Si content in response to treatments, particularly in damaged leaves, but did not deposit this in the form of spines or increased densities of phytoliths. We discuss how the form in which grasses deposit Si may affect their anti-herbivore characteristics and consider the ecological and agricultural implications of the differences in allocation to Si-based defenses between grass species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4324063/ /pubmed/25717331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00035 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hartley, Fitt, McLarnon and Wade. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Hartley, Sue E.
Fitt, Rob N.
McLarnon, Emma L.
Wade, Ruth N.
Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title_full Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title_fullStr Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title_full_unstemmed Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title_short Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
title_sort defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00035
work_keys_str_mv AT hartleysuee defendingtheleafsurfaceintraandinterspecificdifferencesinsilicondepositioningrassesinresponsetodamageandsiliconsupply
AT fittrobn defendingtheleafsurfaceintraandinterspecificdifferencesinsilicondepositioningrassesinresponsetodamageandsiliconsupply
AT mclarnonemmal defendingtheleafsurfaceintraandinterspecificdifferencesinsilicondepositioningrassesinresponsetodamageandsiliconsupply
AT waderuthn defendingtheleafsurfaceintraandinterspecificdifferencesinsilicondepositioningrassesinresponsetodamageandsiliconsupply