Cargando…
Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria
Sustainable intensification (SI) is a multifaceted concept incorporating the ambition to increase or maintain the current level of agricultural yields while reduce negative ecological and environmental impacts. Decision-support systems (DSS) that use integrated analytical methods are often used to s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00023 |
_version_ | 1782356643619536896 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough Moran, Dominic Barnes, Andrew P. Baret, Philippe V. |
author_facet | Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough Moran, Dominic Barnes, Andrew P. Baret, Philippe V. |
author_sort | Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sustainable intensification (SI) is a multifaceted concept incorporating the ambition to increase or maintain the current level of agricultural yields while reduce negative ecological and environmental impacts. Decision-support systems (DSS) that use integrated analytical methods are often used to support decision making processes in agriculture. However, DSS often consist of set of values, objectives, and assumptions that may be inconsistent or in conflict with merits and objectives of SI. These potential conflicts will have consequences for adoption and up-take of agricultural research, technologies and related policies and regulations such as genetic technology in pursuit of SI. This perspective paper aimed at comparing a number of frequently used socio-economic DSS with respect to their capacity in incorporating various dimensions of SI, and discussing their application to analyzing farm animal genetic resources (FAnGR) policies. The case of FAnGR policies was chosen because of its great potential in delivering merits of SI. It was concluded that flexible DSS, with great integration capacity with various natural and social sciences, are needed to provide guidance on feasibility, practicality, and policy implementation for SI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4324152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43241522015-02-25 Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough Moran, Dominic Barnes, Andrew P. Baret, Philippe V. Front Genet Genetics Sustainable intensification (SI) is a multifaceted concept incorporating the ambition to increase or maintain the current level of agricultural yields while reduce negative ecological and environmental impacts. Decision-support systems (DSS) that use integrated analytical methods are often used to support decision making processes in agriculture. However, DSS often consist of set of values, objectives, and assumptions that may be inconsistent or in conflict with merits and objectives of SI. These potential conflicts will have consequences for adoption and up-take of agricultural research, technologies and related policies and regulations such as genetic technology in pursuit of SI. This perspective paper aimed at comparing a number of frequently used socio-economic DSS with respect to their capacity in incorporating various dimensions of SI, and discussing their application to analyzing farm animal genetic resources (FAnGR) policies. The case of FAnGR policies was chosen because of its great potential in delivering merits of SI. It was concluded that flexible DSS, with great integration capacity with various natural and social sciences, are needed to provide guidance on feasibility, practicality, and policy implementation for SI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4324152/ /pubmed/25717336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00023 Text en Copyright © 2015 Vosough Ahmadi, Moran, Barnes and Baret. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough Moran, Dominic Barnes, Andrew P. Baret, Philippe V. Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title | Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title_full | Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title_fullStr | Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title_short | Comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
title_sort | comparing decision-support systems in adopting sustainable intensification criteria |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadiboudavosough comparingdecisionsupportsystemsinadoptingsustainableintensificationcriteria AT morandominic comparingdecisionsupportsystemsinadoptingsustainableintensificationcriteria AT barnesandrewp comparingdecisionsupportsystemsinadoptingsustainableintensificationcriteria AT baretphilippev comparingdecisionsupportsystemsinadoptingsustainableintensificationcriteria |