Cargando…

There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal

Experimental evolution paired with modern sequencing can be a powerful approach to identify the mechanisms by which bacteria adapt to discrete environmental conditions found in nature or during infections. We used this approach to identify mechanisms enabling biofilm specialists of the opportunistic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Rourke, Devon, FitzGerald, Cody E., Traverse, Charles C., Cooper, Vaughn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00018
_version_ 1782356673204060160
author O’Rourke, Devon
FitzGerald, Cody E.
Traverse, Charles C.
Cooper, Vaughn S.
author_facet O’Rourke, Devon
FitzGerald, Cody E.
Traverse, Charles C.
Cooper, Vaughn S.
author_sort O’Rourke, Devon
collection PubMed
description Experimental evolution paired with modern sequencing can be a powerful approach to identify the mechanisms by which bacteria adapt to discrete environmental conditions found in nature or during infections. We used this approach to identify mechanisms enabling biofilm specialists of the opportunistic respiratory pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia to regain planktonic fitness. Seven mutants producing wrinkly (W) small-colony variants by mutations in the wrinkly-spreader operon (wsp) cluster, but with varying duration of biofilm adaptation, served as ancestors of this experiment. Following planktonic growth, each W ancestor produced smooth (S) mutants with distinct fitness effects across planktonic, biofilm, and dispersal-phase environments. The causes of the S phenotype traced to mutations in three gene clusters: wsp, Bcen2424_1436, an uncharacterized two-component transcriptional regulator which appears to be critical for wsp signaling, and a cohort of genes involved in polysaccharide synthesis. The genetic pathway from W to S also associated with evolutionary history in the biofilm environment. W mutants isolated from long-term biofilm selection usually produced S types via secondary wsp mutations, whereas S types evolved from less adapted W ancestors by a wider scope of mutations. These different genetic pathways to suppress the W phenotype suggest that prolonged biofilm adaptation limits routes to subsequent planktonic adaptation, despite common initial mechanisms of biofilm adaptation. More generally, experimental evolution can be used as a nuanced screen for gain-of-function mutations in multiple conditions that illustrate tensions that bacteria may face in changing environments or hosts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4324302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43243022015-02-25 There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal O’Rourke, Devon FitzGerald, Cody E. Traverse, Charles C. Cooper, Vaughn S. Front Genet Genetics Experimental evolution paired with modern sequencing can be a powerful approach to identify the mechanisms by which bacteria adapt to discrete environmental conditions found in nature or during infections. We used this approach to identify mechanisms enabling biofilm specialists of the opportunistic respiratory pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia to regain planktonic fitness. Seven mutants producing wrinkly (W) small-colony variants by mutations in the wrinkly-spreader operon (wsp) cluster, but with varying duration of biofilm adaptation, served as ancestors of this experiment. Following planktonic growth, each W ancestor produced smooth (S) mutants with distinct fitness effects across planktonic, biofilm, and dispersal-phase environments. The causes of the S phenotype traced to mutations in three gene clusters: wsp, Bcen2424_1436, an uncharacterized two-component transcriptional regulator which appears to be critical for wsp signaling, and a cohort of genes involved in polysaccharide synthesis. The genetic pathway from W to S also associated with evolutionary history in the biofilm environment. W mutants isolated from long-term biofilm selection usually produced S types via secondary wsp mutations, whereas S types evolved from less adapted W ancestors by a wider scope of mutations. These different genetic pathways to suppress the W phenotype suggest that prolonged biofilm adaptation limits routes to subsequent planktonic adaptation, despite common initial mechanisms of biofilm adaptation. More generally, experimental evolution can be used as a nuanced screen for gain-of-function mutations in multiple conditions that illustrate tensions that bacteria may face in changing environments or hosts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4324302/ /pubmed/25717335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00018 Text en Copyright © 2015 O’Rourke, FitzGerald, Traverse and Cooper. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
O’Rourke, Devon
FitzGerald, Cody E.
Traverse, Charles C.
Cooper, Vaughn S.
There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title_full There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title_fullStr There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title_full_unstemmed There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title_short There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
title_sort there and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00018
work_keys_str_mv AT orourkedevon thereandbackagainconsequencesofbiofilmspecializationunderselectionfordispersal
AT fitzgeraldcodye thereandbackagainconsequencesofbiofilmspecializationunderselectionfordispersal
AT traversecharlesc thereandbackagainconsequencesofbiofilmspecializationunderselectionfordispersal
AT coopervaughns thereandbackagainconsequencesofbiofilmspecializationunderselectionfordispersal