Cargando…
The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia
BACKGROUND: The Local Government Area of Gosford implemented a water fluoridation scheme in 2008. Therefore the opportunity was taken to record the dental health of primary school children aged 5–7 years prior to the fluoridation and compare the results with other communities in NSW with different a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-9 |
_version_ | 1782356718712258560 |
---|---|
author | Blinkhorn, Anthony S Byun, Roy Johnson, George Metha, Pathik Kay, Meredith Lewis, Peter |
author_facet | Blinkhorn, Anthony S Byun, Roy Johnson, George Metha, Pathik Kay, Meredith Lewis, Peter |
author_sort | Blinkhorn, Anthony S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Local Government Area of Gosford implemented a water fluoridation scheme in 2008. Therefore the opportunity was taken to record the dental health of primary school children aged 5–7 years prior to the fluoridation and compare the results with other communities in NSW with different access to fluoridated water. The aim was to compare the oral health of New South Wales (Australia)s 5–7 year olds living in fluoridated, and non- fluoridated communities. One of the areas was due to implement water fluoridation and is termed the pre-fluoridation site. METHODS: Pupils in the first year of Public and Catholic Schools in three areas of NSW were recruited. Class lists were used to draw a sample of approximately 900 per area. This number allowed for a non-response rate of up to 30 per cent and would give a sample sufficient numbers to allow statistical inferences to be drawn. Children whose parents consented received a dental examination and the clinical data was collected on mark sense cards. RESULTS: In the 3 areas the proportion of children who received a dental examination varied; 77.5% (n = 825) for the fluoridated area, 80.1% (n = 781) for the pre-fluoridated area and 55.3% (n = 523) for the non-fluoridated area. The mean dmft was 1.40 for the fluoridated area, 2.02 for the pre-fluoridated area and 2.09 for the non-fluoridated area. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences were also noted in the proportion of children who were caries free, 62.6% fluoridated area, 50.8% for the pre-fluoride area and 48.6% for the non-fluoride location. CONCLUSION: The children living in the well-established fluoridated area had less dental caries and a higher proportion free from disease when compared with the other two areas which were not fluoridated. Fluoridation demonstrated a clear benefit in terms of better oral health for young children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4324770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43247702015-02-12 The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia Blinkhorn, Anthony S Byun, Roy Johnson, George Metha, Pathik Kay, Meredith Lewis, Peter BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Local Government Area of Gosford implemented a water fluoridation scheme in 2008. Therefore the opportunity was taken to record the dental health of primary school children aged 5–7 years prior to the fluoridation and compare the results with other communities in NSW with different access to fluoridated water. The aim was to compare the oral health of New South Wales (Australia)s 5–7 year olds living in fluoridated, and non- fluoridated communities. One of the areas was due to implement water fluoridation and is termed the pre-fluoridation site. METHODS: Pupils in the first year of Public and Catholic Schools in three areas of NSW were recruited. Class lists were used to draw a sample of approximately 900 per area. This number allowed for a non-response rate of up to 30 per cent and would give a sample sufficient numbers to allow statistical inferences to be drawn. Children whose parents consented received a dental examination and the clinical data was collected on mark sense cards. RESULTS: In the 3 areas the proportion of children who received a dental examination varied; 77.5% (n = 825) for the fluoridated area, 80.1% (n = 781) for the pre-fluoridated area and 55.3% (n = 523) for the non-fluoridated area. The mean dmft was 1.40 for the fluoridated area, 2.02 for the pre-fluoridated area and 2.09 for the non-fluoridated area. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences were also noted in the proportion of children who were caries free, 62.6% fluoridated area, 50.8% for the pre-fluoride area and 48.6% for the non-fluoride location. CONCLUSION: The children living in the well-established fluoridated area had less dental caries and a higher proportion free from disease when compared with the other two areas which were not fluoridated. Fluoridation demonstrated a clear benefit in terms of better oral health for young children. BioMed Central 2015-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4324770/ /pubmed/25604625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-9 Text en © Blinkhorn et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blinkhorn, Anthony S Byun, Roy Johnson, George Metha, Pathik Kay, Meredith Lewis, Peter The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title | The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full | The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title_fullStr | The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title_short | The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australia |
title_sort | dental health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in new south wales, australia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blinkhornanthonys thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT byunroy thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT johnsongeorge thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT methapathik thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT kaymeredith thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT lewispeter thedentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT blinkhornanthonys dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT byunroy dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT johnsongeorge dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT methapathik dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT kaymeredith dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT lewispeter dentalhealthofprimaryschoolchildrenlivinginfluoridatedprefluoridatedandnonfluoridatedcommunitiesinnewsouthwalesaustralia |